Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Management of Post Cholecystectomy Bile Duct Injury

Overview

Comparison between laparoscopic and open surgical management of post cholecystectomy bile duct injury.

Bile duct injury (BDI) post cholecystectomy is an iatrogenic catastrophe associated with significant morbidity , mortality and poor quality of life this is due to the large number of cholecystectomies per year all over the world. Cholecystectomy whether open or laparoscopic is done in large number about 750,000 annually in USA, the incidence of BDI post cholecystectomy is about 0.1-0.2% in open cholecystectomy and 0.4-0.6% in laparoscopic cholecystectomy although the percentage appears small but it still large number about 2100 patients per year. The two most frequent scenarios of BDI may be occurrence of bile leak or bile duct obstruction. Early recognition of iatrogenic bile duct injury is essential to prevent major morbidity by imaging techniques, such as Ultrasound and CT which are extremely valuable during the initial evaluation but MRCP remains the gold standard for diagnosis. ERCP can confirm the presence of biliary injury and provides a means for definitive management. The main aim of surgical treatment is the reconstruction of proper flow of bile to the alimentary tract. Repair of such injuries still remains a challenge due to the variety of size of injury, site of injury if proximal or distal, the severity of injury and the time of presentation after the injury. Repair of such BDI may be done by laparoscopy or by open surgery which still a matter of debate. There are many described techniques should be done by specialized hepatobiliary surgeon from simple repair, repair over T-tube up to hepaticojejunostomy. Despite widespread advances in laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic repair of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury (BDI) has rarely been reported related mainly to technical difficulty.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Outcomes

Central Contacts