BFTAF Elderly Switch Study

Overview

BACKGROUND: Current Kenya National Anti-retroviral (ARV) Guidelines and World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines recommend first-line therapy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), lamivudine (3TC) and dolutegravir (DTG) for adult people living with HIV (PLHIV). This regimen has limitations, particularly for the aging PLHIV who are more likely to have pre-existing comorbidities and higher risk of developing comorbidities, including osteopenia, osteoporosis, and renal insufficiency. Abacavir, the preferred alternative nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) in Kenya, is associated with increased cardiovascular risk that also limits its use in elderly populations. B/F/TAF is highly efficacious, well tolerated, co-formulated in a small pill, and does not have the same bone, renal or cardiovascular risks associated with currently recommended regimens in Kenya. We are not aware of any clinical trial to date that has been fully powered to compare ARV regimens for the increasing population of elderly PLHIV. BROAD OBJECTIVE: We will compare the efficacy, safety, and impact on bone mineral density of switching to B/F/TAF to that of remaining on current ARV regimen in a population of elderly patients (60 years old or greater) with no prior confirmed treatment failure in Kenya.

BACKGROUND Kenya has the fourth largest burden of HIV globally with close to 1.5 million people living with HIV, with the highest prevalence seen in the age group 45-54 years. As PLHIV live longer with early and wider access to ART, we will have an increasingly aging population of PLHIV. The current Kenya National Guidelines and World Health Organization guidelines recommend TDF/3TC/DTG as the preferred first-line regimen for adults. This regimen is efficacious, available as a single-tablet regimen, is relatively well tolerated, and has a reasonable safety profile, particularly in younger populations. Managing older populations is more challenging due to the presence of multiple comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, renal disease and bone disease. TDF is known to cause both renal insufficiency and osteoporosis/osteopenia, and is not recommended for patients with pre-existing renal disease or osteoporosis. Guidelines recommend measurement of renal function before initiation of TDF and ongoing monitoring of renal function, which is a potential barrier to rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation and is not always available or feasible in resource limited settings. Measurement of bone mineral density is expensive and not routinely carried out in resource-limited settings and osteoporosis is often only detected after a fracture. Elderly patients are more likely to have contraindications to the use of TDF but identifying those with contraindications is either not done or is costly and/or can result in a delay in treatment. The current alternative to TDF in many countries is abacavir (ABC), which is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events that is a particular concern for elderly patients, and has the disadvantage that it does not treat hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection. RATIONALE Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a pro-drug of TDF whose pharmacokinetics allow for much lower dosing and reduced renal and bone toxicity compared to TDF, and is also approved to treat HBV. Switch from TDF to TAF has been associated with improvement in bone mineral density and reversion of osteoporosis. Bictegravir is a highly efficacious integrase inhibitor that is non-inferior to DTG for naïve patients and those who are already virally suppressed on DTG/3TC/ABC. Clinical trials have also shown lower rates of drug-related adverse events with B/F/TAF compared to DTG/3TC/ABC or compared to a regimen comprising DTG, emtricitabine (FTC) and TAF (DTG+FTC/TAF). B/F/TAF is a single-tablet once-daily pill that is much smaller than other INSTI co-formulated pills, a fact that may be attractive to patients. The advantages of B/F/TAF are important for all PLHIV but particularly for the elderly population. There is emerging data on increased weight gain associated with use of TAF, BIC or DTG, which may raise concerns about a potential increase in cardiovascular risk and development of type 2 diabetes for PLHIV treated with BFTAF. TDF is known to have lipid-lowering effects and there is an association between increasing lipid parameters with a switch from TDF to TAF, without a difference in change in the total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio. A small retrospective cohort analysis found that switching virally suppressed PLHIV from TDF to TAF was associated with an increase in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score, however there was no change in the total cholesterol to HDL ratio. A major limitation of this study was that it did not include a comparison group of non-switchers and it is not clear that the analysis adequately controlled for the known age-determined increase in ASCVD risk. Another retrospective cohort analysis of switching PLHIV from TDF to TAF similarly found an increase in lipid parameters without an increase in low-density lipoprotein to HDL ratio; ASCVD risk score was not analyzed. A post-hoc analysis of a prospective trial comparing PLHIV initiated on TDF vs TAF-containing regimens found a small but significantly greater increase in ASCVD risk scores in the TAF arm by week 96, however there was no difference in changes between risk categories. In the ADVANCE trial, where ARV-naïve PLHIV were randomized to receive either TAF/FTC+DTG, TDF/FTC+DTG or a combination of TDF, FTC and efavirenz (EFV), there was a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (based on Framingham or QRISK scores) at week 48 with TAF/FTC+DTG compared to TDF/FTC/EFV, but no statistically significant difference in risk between TAF vs TDF within the DTG arms. This study also found that participants treated with TAF/FTC+DTG were at higher risk for developing type 2 diabetes than participants treated with TDF/FTC+DTG (based on QDiabetes risk scores). We are not aware of any clinical trial to date that has been fully powered to compare ARV regimens for the increasing population of elderly PLHIV, nor of any study evaluating a potential change in lipid parameters, cardiovascular risk or risk of type 2 diabetes associated with regimen switch to BFTAF in an elderly population. We propose to conduct an open-label non-inferiority switch trial among elderly PLHIV to address this knowledge gap. HYPOTHESES 1. Switch of virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected elderly adults (≥ 60 years) with no prior confirmed treatment failure to B/F/TAF is non-inferior to continuing current ARV regimen, as determined by risk of developing virological failure by 48 weeks 2. Switch to B/F/TAF will result in increased lumbar spine BMD relative to remaining on current ARV regimen among this elderly population PRIMARY OBJECTIVES 1. To evaluate the non-inferiority of switching to B/F/TAF, compared to maintaining the current ARV regimen, in virologically suppressed HIV-1 positive elderly adults (≥ 60 years) with no prior confirmed virological failure, as determined by HIV-1 RNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ≥ 50 copies/ml at week 48 2. To evaluate the effect of B/F/TAF relative to maintaining the current ARV regimen on percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) after 48 weeks as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) STUDY DESIGN This is a phase IV, multi-center, two-arm, open-label, randomized trial over 48 weeks, describing the efficacy and safety of switching from current ARV regimen to B/F/TAF in virally suppressed HIV-1 infected elderly adults (≥ 60 years) who have been on ART for at least 24 weeks and having achieved virological suppression (HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/ml) for at least 12 weeks, with no prior confirmed virological failure. Participants will be randomized at baseline to remain on their pre-enrollment ARV regimen or switch to B/F/TAF. The study will take place at two sites in Kenya: Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH, the largest teaching and referral hospital in Kenya), and Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital (JOOTRH, the largest teaching and referral hospital in the Nyanza region of Kenya). The outpatient HIV clinics at these sites currently provide ART to over 15,000 PLHIV combined, including over 1,000 elderly patients on first line ART (85% of whom are on TDF/3TC NRTI backbone combined with either DTG or EFV; no patients are currently on TAF or BIC). Study visits will take place at screening, baseline, and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 (with a 4-week extension as required for confirming HIV-1 RNA levels within the FDA snapshot window). HIV-1 RNA viral load will be performed at screening and weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48. If HIV-1 RNA is ≥ 50 copies/ml then a repeat test will be performed at least 2 weeks after the detectable result to confirm virological failure. If the repeat HIV-1 RNA result is ≥ 50 copies/ml this confirms protocol-defined virological failure (PDVF) and genotypic resistance testing will be performed for any repeat viral load ≥ 500 copies/ml. DXA of the lumbar spine and total hip will be performed at baseline and weeks 24 and 48 among the BMD monitoring population. Other routine study investigations will include cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count, complete blood count, serum creatinine (Cr), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), HBsAg, fasting lipids, fasting glucose and patient satisfaction questionnaires (HIVTSQ). Participants will be randomized at baseline in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated randomization sequence to either continue with their current ARV regimen or switch to B/F/TAF. STUDY POPULATION Number of Participants and Participant Selection The anticipated sample size is 516 participants (258 per study arm) started on study treatment among patients on ARV therapy for at least 24 weeks and no prior virological failure (defined as two consecutive HIV-1 RNA viral loads ≥ 50 copies/ml separated by at least 2 weeks), with a viral load of \< 50 copies/ml for at least 12 weeks, and aged 60 years or above. Patients who have a prior history of changing ARV regimens for reasons other than treatment failure can participate in the study if they meet all eligibility criteria. We anticipate screening approximately 740 patients and enrolling 520 participants to achieve the sample size of 516 participants on treatment. There are currently over 1,000 elderly patients on first-line ARV therapy at the two study sites. Assuming a viral suppression rate of 85% among this group (MoH, 2019), we will have at least 850 patients available for screening in order to enrol the sample size 516 participants on treatment. The estimated enrollment per study site is: KNH, 330; JOOTRH, 190. Participants enrolled at KNH will enter the BMD monitoring population (after excluding participants with pre-existing conditions likely to decrease validity of BMD estimates). The primary analyses will use all participants in the intent-to-treat exposed (ITT-E) population, consisting of randomly assigned participants who receive at least one dose of the study drug. Recruitment Participants will be recruited from patients who are receiving routine outpatient HIV care at the two study sites. Eligible participants who provide written informed consent will undergo screening laboratory investigations (HIV-1 RNA viral load, complete blood count, AST, ALT, serum Cr, and HBsAg). Patients who meet all eligibility criteria after screening investigations will be enrolled in the study within 28 days of the screening. During the enrollment visit, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue their current ARV regimen or switch to B/F/TAF. Participants who enrol into the study at KNH will constitute the BMD monitoring population (after excluding participants with pre-existing conditions likely to decrease validity of BMD estimates), for whom baseline total hip and lumbar spine DXA will be performed.