The goal of the study is to investigate the feasibility and the effects of a home-based upper-limb rehabilitation treatment (based on teleconsulting, telemonitoring, and robotic telerehabilitation using the robot Icone and integrated sensors) in patients with stroke.
Stroke is the second leading cause of death, the third leading cause of disability in the world and the leading cause of disability in the elderly. Rehabilitation treatment is a long and costly process, the effectiveness of which is supported by strong scientific evidence. In recent years, technology has spread to the rehabilitation field and, to date, the use of rehabilitation robotics, in addition to conventional treatment, is recommended by some stroke guidelines. The coronavirus pandemic has required a reorganization of rehabilitation services, but also an enhancement of technology as a tool in the rehabilitation field that can allow treatment in compliance with social distancing. Many scientific works have in fact confirmed the usefulness of these approaches to overcome the limits imposed by the pandemic, in particular for the treatment of disabilities in stroke patients. The rehabilitation robot Icone (CE marked medical device, Class II-A, produced by Heaxel), is a device with certification for home use and therefore suitable for telerehabilitation. The proposed study aims to test the feasibility of rehabilitation treatment in a home setting based on a system of telecounseling, telemonitoring and robotic telerehabilitation using the robot Icone and integrated sensors for patients with stroke, to overcome the limits imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients undergo robotic telerehabilitation treatment, carried out at home. The patient is supervised by a caregiver and, remotely, by a multidisciplinary team thanks to the use of webcams and sensors embedded in the robot. The evaluations, through clinical scales and instrumental evaluations, are carried out both in presence (at the enrollment and the end of the study) and remotely (before the first telerobotic rehabilitation session, in the middle and after the last telerobotic rehabilitation session). The study is included in the Regional Smart Specialization Strategy (S3 - Biorobotics for rehabilitation) for business \& life continuity and co-financed by the European Union through LazioInnova
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
The upper limb rehabilitation will be carried out with the planar rehabilitation robot Icone (a CE Class IIA medical device manufactured by Heaxel). The proposed exercises require the patient to move a cursor on the screen using the end-effector of the robot to reach specific points (planar reaching exercises). When the patient is able to perform these exercises independently, the robot assists the movement by minimizing the interaction force applied to the hand and limiting itself to acquiring the kinematic and dynamic parameters of the exercise, which are useful in determining the state of motor skills. Icone assist the subject by applying a force to his hand that helps him complete the task in the phases where the patient plans the movement correctly but is unable to complete it. As a result, the system will enable you to perform planar elbow and shoulder movements in active, passive, or active-assisted modes, with visual and acoustic feedback.
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Santa Maria della Provvidenza Center
Rome, Italy
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment Upper Extremity motor functioning
It is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 66 points (normal).
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Fugl-meyer Assessment Upper Extremity motor functioning (FMA)
The value of the FMA obtained by means of online observation of the patient will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by means of direct observation, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Time frame: Before the intervention
System Usability Scale
It is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate usability. It ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better usability.
Time frame: After a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
It is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the acceptance of the provided intervention. It comprises several questions rated on a 7-point likert scale.
Time frame: After a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Likert for Satisfaction
Satisfaction will be assessed using a 11-point likert scale. It ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores mean higher satisfaction.
Time frame: After a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment Upper Extremity motor functioning
t is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 66 points (normal).
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment - Sensory functioning
It is a stroke-specific, sensory impairment index. It ranges from 0 (worse) to 12 points (best).
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment - Sensory functioning
It is a stroke-specific, sensory impairment index. It ranges from 0 (worse) to 12 points (best).
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Numeric Rating Scale for pain
The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Numeric Rating Scale for pain
The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Independence Index
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represent the ratio between the minor and major axes of the ellipse best fitting the hand path in Cartesian coordinates during a circle drawing task.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Independence Index
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represent the ratio between the minor and major axes of the ellipse best fitting the hand path in Cartesian coordinates during a circle drawing task.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Area Index [m2]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represent the area of the ellipse best fitting the hand path in Cartesian coordinates during a circle drawing task.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Area Index [m2]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represent the area of the ellipse best fitting the hand path in Cartesian coordinates during a circle drawing task.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Path Index [mm]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean distance of the travelled path from the ideal path during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Path Index [mm]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean distance of the travelled path from the ideal path during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Movement Duration index [t]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean time required to perform a movement during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Movement Duration index [t]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean time required to perform a movement during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Peak speed index [m/s]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the maximum value of the speed during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Peak speed index [m/s]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the maximum value of the speed during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Mean speed index [m/s]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean value of the speed during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Mean speed index [m/s]
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean value of the speed during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Smoothness index
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the ratio between the mean and the maximum value of the speed during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Smoothness index
It is a kinematic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the ratio between the mean and the maximum value of the speed during a point-to-point (reaching) task
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Hold index [m]
It is a kinetic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean value of the displacement of the end-effector of the robot when the patient is required to hold it in the middle of the workspace against centrifugal forces aimed to move the end-effector toward the targets. It decreases when the patient's strength increases.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Hold index [m]
It is a kinetic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean value of the displacement of the end-effector of the robot when the patient is required to hold it in the middle of the workspace against centrifugal forces aimed to move the end-effector toward the targets. It decreases when the patient's strength increases.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Displacement index [m]
It is a kinetic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean value of the displacement of the end-effector of the robot when the patient is required to move it toward the eight targets against a centripetal force that try to hold it in the middle of the workspace. It increases when the patient's strength increases.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in the Displacement index [m]
It is a kinetic index computed by means of the robotic device. It represents the mean value of the displacement of the end-effector of the robot when the patient is required to move it toward the eight targets against a centripetal force that try to hold it in the middle of the workspace. It increases when the patient's strength increases.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Independence Index
The reliability of the index obtained by the patient using the robot at home will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by the patient using the robot in the clinic, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Time frame: Before the intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Area Index
The reliability of the index obtained by the patient using the robot at home will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by the patient using the robot in the clinic, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Time frame: Before the intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Path Index
The reliability of the index obtained by the patient using the robot at home will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by the patient using the robot in the clinic, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Movement Duration index
The reliability of the index obtained by the patient using the robot at home will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by the patient using the robot in the clinic, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Smoothness index
The reliability of the index obtained by the patient using the robot at home will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by the patient using the robot in the clinic, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Time frame: Before the intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Peak speed index
The reliability of the index obtained by the patient using the robot at home will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by the patient using the robot in the clinic, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Time frame: Before the intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Mean speed index
The reliability of the index obtained by the patient using the robot at home will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by the patient using the robot in the clinic, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Time frame: Before the intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Hold index
The reliability of the index obtained by the patient using the robot at home will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by the patient using the robot in the clinic, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Time frame: Before the intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Displacement index
The reliability of the index obtained by the patient using the robot at home will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by the patient using the robot in the clinic, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.It increases when the patient's strength increases.
Time frame: Before the intervention