The study will examine the effectiveness of a decellularized dermal matrix (i.e., DermGEN™) in improving wound healing, quality of life and associated costs of treatment of DFUs in First Nations people living in the Northwestern Ontario Communities. First Nations people with active diabetic foot (DFU) ulcer attending a wound care clinic located at the Rainy River district office. An interventional, two-arm, randomized, prospective study of (1) standard of care (control) vs. (2) DermGEN™ - a decellularized dermal matrix (treatment) will be used in the treatment and management of DFU. Patients will be randomized to each arm (n=60 per arm) based on power calculations using data from our Pilot study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
120
debridement, wound dressings, offloading
Decellularized human dermal matrix created from donated human skin
Northwestern Ontario (NWO) Wound Care Centre of Excellence
Emo, Ontario, Canada
Mean and median reduction in wound area in the first 4 weeks
Mean and Median reduction in wound area in comparison to Treatment day 0. Area measured with Silhouette® measurement camera.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Proportion with complete healing in the first 8 weeks
Proportion with complete healing in the first 8 weeks. (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage.)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Proportion with complete healing in the first 12 weeks
Proportion with complete healing in the first 12 weeks. (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage.)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Incidence of adverse events.
Number of adverse events observed for each arm divided by participants in each arm, reported as a percentage
Time frame: Reports included at any time up to and including 20 weeks post treatment.
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 1 week
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Wound - LUMT Score
Impact of treatment as measured by Leg Ulcer Management Tool (LUMT) score. Comparing initial LUMT score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)
Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)
Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)
Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life (WoundQoL)
Impact of treatment on Quality of Life using the WoundQoL questionnaire score. Comparison of score on treatment day 0 to subsequent weeks.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Proportion with complete healing at any time point
Number of wounds closed (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage)at any time divided by the number of participants in each arm reported as a percentage
Time frame: up to and including 20 weeks post initial treatment (Day 0)
Time to first-measured complete healing
Time to first-measured complete healing (Complete healing is defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage)
Time frame: up to and including 20 weeks post initial treatment (Day 0)
Mean and median reduction in wound area at 8 weeks
Mean and Median reduction in wound area in comparison to Treatment Day 0. Area measured with Silhouette® measurement camera.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Mean and median reduction in wound area at 12 weeks
Mean and Median reduction in wound area in comparison to Treatment Day 0. Area measured with Silhouette® measurement camera.
Time frame: 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.