Comparison of docetaxel and Nab-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
1\. To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by docetaxel and EC followed by nab-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer; 2. To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (EC) chemotherapy regimen in neoadjuvant therapy of breast cancer, so as to provide a new treatment option for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-negative breast cancer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
30
To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by docetaxel and EC followed by nab-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer; To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (EC) chemotherapy regimen in neoadjuvant therapy of breast cancer, so as to provide a new treatment option for patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.
To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by docetaxel and EC followed by nab-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer; To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (EC) chemotherapy regimen in neoadjuvant therapy of breast cancer, so as to provide a new treatment option for patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.
pathologic complete response (pCR) rate
Proportion of PCR patients in enrolled breast cancer patients
Time frame: 21 weeks
Total clinical response rate
The clinical response rate was assessed by ultrasound measurement of tumor size
Time frame: 21 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.