Hoarding disorder (HD) is a chronic, progressive, and debilitating psychiatric condition that leads to devastating personal and public consequences, particularly for older adults. This confirmatory efficacy trial will advance our knowledge of the mechanisms of action in the treatment of HD as well as reduce symptom severity, disability, and community consequences.
Hoarding disorder (HD) is a chronic, progressive, and debilitating psychiatric condition that leads to devastating personal and community consequences, particularly for older adults. HD is defined by persistent difficulty discarding or parting with possessions due to distress associated with discarding, urges to save, and/or difficulty making decisions about what to keep and what to discard. As a result, clutter accumulates and fills active living areas, preventing the normal use of space and resulting in distress and disability. Community epidemiological reports estimate the prevalence of clinically significant hoarding symptoms at 7% in individuals over age 60 and even higher rates in those over age 70. HD is the only neuropsychiatric condition that progresses in severity and population prevalence with age apart from dementia. Inhibition and cognitive switching have been identified as key deficits in older adults with HD. These executive functioning areas are consistent with the RDoC cognitive control domain and particularly the goal selection, updating, representation, and maintenance subconstruct. Findings suggest that these deficits may contribute to the symptomatic expression of HD, degree of functional impairment, and modest responses to HD treatment. Furthermore, anticipatory and experiential fear and anxiety, consistent with the RDoC constructs of acute and potential threat, lead to sustained problems with discarding items and clutter accumulation. When these constructs are targeted, our group has produced clinically and statistically significant outcomes. Consistent with NIMH strategic goal 3.1, to arrive at effective treatment approaches for unmet therapeutic domains in behavioral science, this project seeks to conduct the first confirmatory efficacy trial for older adults with HD. We propose a RCT comparing CREST to a case management control condition for 150 adults age 50 and older with HD. We are examining age as a moderator and will therefore include both midlife and late life participants. An evaluation of treatment outcome, including hoarding severity and functional outcomes, will be conducted at baseline (0 months), mid-treatment (3 months), end of treatment (6 months), 3-month (9 months) and 6-month follow-up (12 months). Participants will receive 26 weekly 60-minute individual sessions over the course of 32 weeks maximum (6-7.5 months). They will receive 50% in home and 50% office visits. We will examine factors that mediate improvement in CREST (improved inhibition/cognitive switching and reduction in fear/anxiety of discarding items) through physiological, behavioral, self-report, and paradigm assessments. Individual factors (e.g., age and other demographic factors, baseline cognitive control, baseline hoarding severity) and treatment factors (e.g., session attendance) will be evaluated as moderators. The specific aims include determining confirmatory efficacy of CREST, mechanisms of CREST effects, and moderators of CREST. If successful, this project would lead to an effectiveness trial in a real world setting.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
150
Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Therapy (CREST) includes cognitive rehabilitation of executive functioning and exposure therapy for discarding/not acquiring.
Case management includes linking to resources, monitoring health, and safety hazards.
Guava Hall
San Diego, California, United States
Change in Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R)
Hoarding symptom severity will be measured using the Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R), a 23-item self-report measure used to assess common HD symptoms. Subscales include excessive clutter, compulsive acquisition, and difficulty discarding. The SI-R has demonstrated good internal consistency, concurrent validity, divergent validity, and test-retest reliability in clinical samples with HD. The total score will be used for analyses.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in Self-report Clutter Image Rating (CIR)
The Clutter Image Rating Scale (CIR) is a measure using a series of 9 photographs each of a kitchen, living room, and bedroom with varying levels of clutter. Participants and the rater independently select the photograph that most closely resembles each of the three rooms in the home. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and correlations with validated HD measures for the CIR were high.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
PROMIS-43 Profile v2.
Functioning will be assessed with the PROMIS-43 Profile v2., which consists of a fixed collection of 6-item sets to assess global health and functioning (in physical, mental, and social domains). The PROMIS-43 assesses anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, pain intensity, physical functioning, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. Substantial evidence supports the validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change of the PROMIS measures among adults with and without medical and mental health conditions.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA-2)
The UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA-2) is an assessment of everyday functioning skills involved in household management (e.g., writing a shopping list based on a provided recipe), communication (e.g., rescheduling a doctor's appointment), finance (e.g., paying a utility bill), comprehension/planning (e.g., planning an outing), medication management (taking medications as planned), and transportation (e.g., reading comprehension of a bus schedule). The UPSA-2 has demonstrated high inter-rater reliability (0.91) and convergent validity with other performance-based measures. The total UPSA-2 summary score will be used for analyses.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
UCSD SORT Test (U-SORT)
The UCSD SORT Test (U-SORT) will be used to measure participants' organizational skills as they relate to functional capacity. During the administration of the U-SORT, participants are instructed to sort 42 household objects (e.g., bent and unbent paper clips, used and unused condiment packets) from a hypothetical "junk drawer" into either "keep" or "trash" piles. Participants are given two minutes to complete the task and one point is awarded for each correctly sorted item, for a total of 42 points. The U-SORT has high internal consistency (alpha = .86) and adequate convergent validity. The total U-SORT score will be used in analyses.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year