One in eight children and young people (CYP) suffer mental health problems needing support or treatment and 5% have more than one such problem. The effects can be major, affecting CYP emotionally and functionally, impacting progress at school, relationships with others and increasing long term risk of mental health problems. Parents, schools, policy makers and the NHS often struggle to find the best way to help, especially within their limited budgets. The UK Government and the NHS have highlighted the need to improve mental health in CYP. The most common treatment is cognitive behavioural therapy; however this can be time consuming, needs to be delivered over many weeks, must focus on the most upsetting problem first and is not very effective. One way to overcome this is to evaluate a group therapy that can treat multiple mental health problems at once. This new treatment is called Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). The aim of the study is to see if participating in a randomized trial of Group MCT is a feasible and acceptable treatment for CYP suffering with anxiety, stress, depression, or a combination in comparison to usual care. This allows us to test key questions about recruitment and drop-out rates, test the protocol, and gain information about MCT including training and supervision needs of clinicians and the experience of patients receiving it.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
95
Treatment usually delivered in service that may include but is not limited to cognitive behaviour therapy, exposure, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing , behaviour therapy, family therapy.
Group metacognitive therapy (Group-MCT) focuses on developing adaptive control of worry, repetitive negative thinking and attention and modifies beliefs that maintain unhelpful thinking patterns. Treatment is 6 to 8 weekly sessions delivered by two trained mental health professionals, guided by a treatment manual, lasting approximately 90 minutes each session.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, United Kingdom
Revised Children Anxiety and Depression Scale - Short Version (RCADS)
Youth self-report questionnaire measuring total anxiety, total depression and total anxiety and depression. This is a feasibility study and therefore it is not primarily powered to detect a difference (change in scores). The principal aim is to test the feasibility of a study using. Here we are testing the feasibility of using the measures (RCADS), therefore the measures will be assessed by monitoring descriptive data and the analysis of complete data once follow up has been completed. Specifically, range in scores, number of complete measures, proportion of missing data. Analyses of outcomes (change) will focus on descriptive statistics and confidence intervals for treatment effects.
Time frame: Baseline, 20 weeks follow up, 32 weeks follow up, 44 weeks follow up
Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Measure of psychological well-being across five subscales: emotion, hyperactivity, conduct, peer relations and pro-social behaviour. Feasibility of the measure will be assessed by monitoring descriptive data and the analysis of complete data once follow up has been completed. Analyses of outcomes (change) will focus on descriptive statistics and confidence intervals for treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, 20 weeks follow up, 32 weeks follow up, 44 weeks follow up
Metacognition Questionnaire - Adolescent Version (MCQ-A)
Measure of metacognitive beliefs across five subscales: positive beliefs about worry, negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger, cognitive confidence, cognitive self-consciousness and cognitive control. Feasibility of the measure will be assessed by monitoring descriptive data and the analysis of complete data once follow up has been completed. Analyses of outcomes (change) will focus on descriptive statistics and confidence intervals for treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, 20 weeks follow up, 32 weeks follow up, 44 weeks follow up
Mood & Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Measure of depressive symptoms in 6-17 year olds. Feasibility of the measure will be assessed by monitoring descriptive data and the analysis of complete data once follow up has been completed. Analyses of outcomes (change) will focus on descriptive statistics and confidence intervals for treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, 20 weeks follow up, 32 weeks follow up, 44 weeks follow up
Child Health Utility - 9D (CHU-9D)
Measure of paediatric quality of life using dimensions: worried, sad, pain, tired, annoyed, school/homework, sleep, daily routine, ability to join in activities. Feasibility of the measure will be assessed by monitoring descriptive data and the analysis of complete data once follow up has been completed. Analyses of outcomes (change) will focus on descriptive statistics and confidence intervals for treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, 20 weeks follow up, 32 weeks follow up, 44 weeks follow up
Health and Social Case Service-Use Interview (SUI)
Assessment of the child's use of primary, secondary or community-based health and social care services and how often they have used the service in the last 16 weeks or since last study assessment.
Time frame: Baseline, 20 weeks follow up, 32 weeks follow up, 44 weeks follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.