A 510k approved dental device for subjects requiring single or multiple tooth replacement with implants where immediate restoration/loading is preferred.
The rationale for this study is to provide scientific data on the clinical performance and patient reported outcomes of the PrimeTaper EV implant when utilizing non-guided vs guided surgical technique. The PrimeTaper EV implant has the OsseoSpeed surface, which is especially indicated for use in soft bone applications where implants with other surface treatments may be less effective. The main interests of this study are to assess the survival and the success rates of the implants supporting maxillary or mandibular fixed single or 2-fixture restorations after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years in function
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
The PrimeTaper EV Implant is a screw shaped dental implant with a defined surface achieved through grit blasting, followed by a process involving a treatment in diluted hydrofluoric acid. There is a conical connection between the implants and the abutments for a tight and stable connection.
McClain and Schallhorn Periodontics and Implant Dentistry
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Colorado Gum Care
Broomfield, Colorado, United States
Periodontal Medicine Surgical Specialists, LLC
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States
Metro West Orthodontics & Periodontics
To evaluate implant survival rate at 1 year after final restoration attachment (screw retained when feasible) with single and multiple (fixed bridges) PrimeTaper EV implant(s) utilizing non-guided versus guided surgery
Number of remaining implants counted clinically and radiographically, i.e. 'Yes' or 'No' for each implant where 'Yes' means that the implant is still remaining and 'No' means that the implant is not remaining.
Time frame: 1 year after final restoration
Implant stability by manual clinical examination
Mobility (manual stability) will be assessed by a percussion test for resonance indicative of bone to implant contact vertically and laterally.
Time frame: throughout study, up to the 5 year follow up
Implant survival rate
Number of remaining implants counted clinically and radiographically, i.e. 'Yes' or 'No' for each implant where 'Yes' means that the implant is still remaining and 'No' means that the implant is not remaining.
Time frame: 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after final restoration attachment
Maintenance of marginal bone levels on patient- and implant level.
Changes (mm) in marginal bone level (MBL)
Time frame: throughout study up to the 5 year follow up visit
Condition of the peri-implant mucosa (Plaque Index)
Plaque index will be measured following implant placement by visual inspection using a scoring system of 0-1, 0 being no plaque is present and 1 being plaque is present.
Time frame: measured at 12 days (no BOP, PPD), 16 weeks, 20 weeks, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 years,
Condition of the peri-implant mucosa (Recession)
Recession will be measured following implant placement by placing a probe between the tooth and gum to record depth of recession in millimeters from the crown margin to the gingival margin rounded to the nearest 0.5 mm.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
La Vista, Nebraska, United States
Perio & Implant Associates of Middle TN
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Perio Health Professionals
Houston, Texas, United States
Oral Health Specialists
Tacoma, Washington, United States
WisNova Institute of Dental Specialists
Kenosha, Wisconsin, United States
Time frame: measured at 12 days (no BOP, PPD), 16 weeks, 20 weeks, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 years,
Condition of the peri-implant mucosa (Suppuration by visual inspection).
Suppuration presence or absence will be measured following implant placement by using a scoring system of 0-1. 0 being no suppuration and 1 being suppuration is present. It is being identified by visual inspection and palpitation of moderate inflammation.
Time frame: measured at 12 days (no BOP, PPD), 16 weeks, 20 weeks, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 years,
Condition of the peri-implant mucosa.
Keratinized Tissue Width (KTw) will be measures following implant placement
Time frame: measured at 12 days, 20 weeks, 1,2,3,4,5 years
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)
subjects will be interviewed to ask about Discomfort using a 0 (no discomfort)-10 (as much discomfort as i have ever felt) point grading system
Time frame: 20 weeks, 6 months, years 1,2,3,4,5
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)
subjects will be interviewed to ask about Esthetics using a 0 (completely displeased)-10 (completely pleased) point grading system
Time frame: 20 weeks, 6 months, years 1,2,3,4,5
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)
subjects will be interviewed to ask about Satisfaction using a 0 (completely dissatisfied) -10 (completely satisfied) point grading system
Time frame: 20 weeks, 6 months, years 1,2,3,4,5
Investigator Assessment of the Implant-Prosthetic Complex
Evaluation of the Esthetic outcome on a 4 point scale (1=very good, 2= good, 3=acceptable, 4=not acceptable)
Time frame: 20 weeks and 5 years.
Investigator Assessment of the Implant-Prosthetic Complex
Evaluation of Function a 4 point scale (1=very good, 2= good, 3=acceptable, 4=not acceptable)
Time frame: 20 weeks and 5 years.
Investigator Assessment of the Implant-Prosthetic Complex
Evaluation of Gingival Health n a 4 point scale (1=very good, 2= good, 3=acceptable, 4=not acceptable)
Time frame: 20 weeks and 5 years.
Investigator Assessment of the Implant-Prosthetic Complex
Evaluation of Bone Level of the permanent prosthetic restoration n a 4 point scale (1=very good, 2= good, 3=acceptable, 4=not acceptable)
Time frame: 20 weeks and 5 years.
Implant success
Proportion of implants with the derived answer 'No' on the occurrence of "pain", "mobility", "≥2 mm radiological bone loss from initial placement", "infection", "radiolucency" and "6" or greater on the Subject Satisfaction PRO Question and "Very good", "good" or "acceptable" on each Investigator Evaluation of Esthetic Outcome, Function, Gingival Health, Bone Level
Time frame: throughout study up to the 5 year follow up visit
Prosthetic survival
Proportion of original permanent prosthetic restorations still in place at the 5 years after final restoration attachment.
Time frame: 5 years after final restoration attachment
Prosthetic success
Analysis of successful permanent prosthetic restorations (implant-prosthetic complex); Number of suprastructure fractures, technical repairs 5 years after final restoration attachment.
Time frame: 5 years after final restoration attachment.