Up to 60% of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with a prolonged stay in the ICU develop complications such as intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) characterized by limb and respiratory muscle weakness. ICUAW is associated with worse prognosis, longer ICU stay and increased morbidity and mortality. Physical therapy (PT) interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU), can improve patients' outcomes. However, improvements in muscle function achieved with standard physical activity interventions aiming at early mobilization are highly variable due to lack of consistency in definition of the interventions, lack of consideration for the complexity of exercise dose and/or insufficient stimulation of muscles during interventions. It has been suggested that modifying early mobilization and exercise protocols towards shorter intervals consisting of higher intensity exercises might result in more optimal stimulation of muscles. In the present study the researchers therefore aim to simultaneously assess (by non-invasive technologies) locomotor muscle oxygenation and activation along with the measurements of the load imposed on respiration and circulation during two different training modalities i.e., moderate intensity continuous bed-cycling (endurance training) vs high-intensity alternated by lower intensity periods of bed-cycling (interval training).
Critical illness is related to high morbidity and mortality rates, and health-care costs. Up to 60% of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with a prolonged stay in the ICU develop complications such as intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) characterized by limb and respiratory muscle weakness. These abnormalities develop already within the first days to weeks after intensive care unit (ICU) admission and are related to immobility, sepsis, inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), prolonged mechanical ventilation, multiple organ failure, and the use of corticosteroids. ICUAW is associated with worse prognosis, longer ICU stay and increased morbidity and mortality. Survivors of critical illness frequently report long-term physical impairments persisting up to 5 years after discharge. Physical therapy (PT) interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU), can improve patients' outcomes. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of strategies to improve physical functioning of ICU survivors identified the importance of PT interventions in the ICU. Early rehabilitation during ICU admission has the potential to result in important clinical benefits for patients. These findings highlight the importance of aiming to apply mobilization strategies early during ICU stay to maintain and improve physical functioning as good as possible. With a projected increase in the number of critically ill patients, requiring rehabilitation in the ICU effective and efficient rehabilitation interventions are warranted. However, improvements in muscle function achieved with standard physical activity interventions aiming at early mobilization are highly variable. Therefore, there is a need for implementing more evidence-based PT interventions, as part of routine clinical practice. Variable results of current interventions may be due to lack of consistency in definition of the interventions, lack of consideration for the complexity of exercise dose and/or insufficient stimulation of muscles during interventions. It has been suggested that modifying early mobilization and exercise protocols towards shorter intervals consisting of higher intensity exercises might result in more optimal stimulation of muscles. A recent study evaluating a cohort of 181 consecutive patients receiving 541 in-bed cycling sessions as part of routine PT interventions in ICU showed that constant-load bed-cycling appears to be both feasible and safe. In addition, recent evidence in patients with chronic lung disease shows that acute alteration of intense and less intense periods of exercise induced partial restoration of local muscle oxygen stores during the less intense periods of exercise facilitating the muscles to achieve higher exercise intensities during the intense periods, compared to constant-load submaximal exercise. Hence, in patients with chronic lung diseases, alternating intense with less intense loads during interval exercise may be physiologically more effective than constant submaximal workloads maintained during endurance type training for achieving a higher stimulation of locomotor muscles. This has not been investigated so far in intensive care unit patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Patients will actively cycle for a minimum duration of 10 minutes and a maximum duration of 20 minutes without breaks.
Patients will cycle for the same duration as during constant-load exercise. Interval bed-cycling session will consist of 30 seconds of high intensity exercise alternated by 30 seconds of passive cycling designed so that volume of training will be equal.
University Hospital Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
RECRUITINGDifferences between bed-cycling protocols in fractional oxygen saturation (StiO2,%) for each measured region of the m. quadriceps femoris
Assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy
Time frame: constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in activation (sEMG amplitude) for each measured region of the muscle quadriceps femoris
Assessed by surface electromyography
Time frame: constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Adverse event rate during constant-load bed-cycling
Constant-load bed-cycling protocol will be considered as a safe intervention in case the adverse event rate will be less than 2.6%; adverse events: catheter/tube removal, increase in vasoactive medications \>5mcg/min, increase in systolic blood pressure \> 200 mmHg for \> 2min, decrease in mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg for \> 2 min, decrease in heart rate \< 50 bpm for \> 2 min, increase in heart rate \> 140 beats per minute for \> 2 min, increase in respiratory rate and sustained \> 5 min after session, decrease in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation \< 88% for \> 1 min requiring an increase in fraction of inspired oxygen \> 0.1 sustained \> 5 min)
Time frame: 1 session of maximal 20 minutes of constant-load bed-cycling per patient
Adverse event rate during interval bed-cycling
Interval bed-cycling protocol will be considered as a safe intervention in case the adverse event rate will be less than 2.6%; adverse events: catheter/tube removal, increase in vasoactive medications \>5mcg/min, increase in systolic blood pressure \> 200 mmHg for \> 2min, decrease in mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg for \> 2 min, decrease in heart rate \< 50 bpm for \> 2 min, increase in heart rate \> 140 beats per minute for \> 2 min, increase in respiratory rate and sustained \> 5 min after session, decrease in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation \< 88% for \> 1 min requiring an increase in fraction of inspired oxygen \> 0.1 sustained \> 5 min)
Time frame: 1 session of maximal 20 minutes of interval bed-cycling per patient
Percentage of completed constant-load bed-cycling sessions
The constant-load bed-cycling is deemed to be feasible if at least 80% of planned constant-load sessions were able to be commenced and 80% of commenced sessions can be completed
Time frame: 1 session of maximal 20 minutes of constant-load bed-cycling per patient
Percentage of completed interval bed-cycling sessions
The interval bed-cycling is deemed to be feasible if at least 80% of planned interval sessions were able to be commenced and 80% of commenced sessions can be completed
Time frame: 1 session of maximal 20 minutes of interval bed-cycling per patient
Differences in Relative dispersion (RD) of fractional oxygen saturation (StiO2,%) among the different regions of quadriceps femoris as indicator of heterogeneity of fractional oxygen extraction among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Differences between exercise protocols in Relative dispersion (RD) of fractional oxygen saturation (StiO2,%) among the different regions of quadriceps femoris (i.e., vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris upper part and rectus femoris lower part) as indicator of heterogeneity of fractional oxygen extraction among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Time frame: 1 session constant-load bed-cycling + 1 interval bed-cycling session administered in 2 different days within 1 week.
Differences between exercise protocols in oxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (OxyHb/Mb), deoxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (DeoxyHb/Mb) and total hemoglobin/myoglobin concentration (TotHb/Mb) for each measured region of quadriceps femoris
Differences between exercise protocols in oxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (OxyHb/Mb), deoxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (DeoxyHb/Mb) and total hemoglobin/myoglobin concentration (TotHb/Mb) for each measured region of quadriceps femoris (i.e., vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris upper part and rectus femoris lower part)
Time frame: 1 session constant-load bed-cycling + 1 interval bed-cycling session administered in 2 different days within 1 week.
Differences in Median frequency of sEMG of different regions of quadriceps femoris
Differences in Median frequency of sEMG of different regions of quadriceps femoris (i.e., vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris upper part and rectus femoris lower part) between exercise protocols
Time frame: 1 session constant-load bed-cycling + 1 interval bed-cycling session administered in 2 different days within 1 week.
Differences in relative dispersion (RD) of sEMG values among the different regions of quadriceps femoris as indicator of heterogeneity of activation among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Differences between exercise protocols in relative dispersion (RD) of sEMG values among the different regions of quadriceps femoris as indicator of heterogeneity of activation among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1 session constant-load bed-cycling + 1 interval bed-cycling session administered in 2 different days within 1 week.
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in heart rate
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Time frame: constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in mean arterial blood pressure
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Time frame: constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in respiratory frequency
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Time frame: constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in minute ventilation
In case of mechanically ventilated patients
Time frame: constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in tidal volume
In case of mechanically ventilated patients
Time frame: constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Time frame: constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week