Effect of Pulsed Mode Radiofrequency as a Treatment of Lumbar Disc Related Radicular Pain on Tumor Necrotic Factor α Level

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial that will be carried out on 80 patients diagnosed as having symptomatic lumbar disc prolapse. The study will be planned by taking the local ethics committee approval and patients' written consent. Between 20-75 years of age, 40 patients will receive pulsed radiofrequency on dorsal root ganglion combined with transforaminal steroids injection procedure and 30 patients will receive transforaminal steroid injection. All patients are suffering more than 3 months long chronic pain syndrome. Patients will be informed about the technique, at the level of cooperation that can provide this information to understand and work with patients who have the level of cooperation that can provide this information to understand and agree to participate in work will be included in the study. Patients included in the study will be given an appointment for the procedure and Written consent will be obtained from all participants .The patients will be recruited from the neurology and pain clinic of Beni-Suef University Hospital, in the period from March 2022 to September 2022. Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed as having symptomatic lumbar disc prolapse based on the following: 1. Clinical evidence of disc pulge in the form of disc related radicular pain of \>3 months duration, not responding to conservative treatment and interfering with daily activities 2. Radiological demonstration of posterolateral lumbar disc pulge by MRI lumbosacral 3. Age range is between 30-80 years Exclusion criteria: The following patients will be excluded from the study: 1. Patients with spinal deformities 2. Patients with a previous history of spinal trauma 3. Patients with previous spinal surgery 4. Patients with radiological evidence of any inflammatory or neoplastic lesion affecting the spinal cord or vertebral column 5. Patients with severe lumbar disc herniation causing lower limb weakness or sphincteric troubles 6. Patient with pain rather than radicular neuropathic pain as Facet osteoarthritis, Sacroiliitis, Hip osteoarthritis, Discogenic, Pyriformis syndrome. 7. Patients with contraindications to interventions (coagulopathy, sepsis, or allergy to the used drugs) 8. Patients with contraindications for MRI examination (e.g., metallic implants such as pacemakers, surgical aneurysm clips, or known metal fragments embedded in the body). 9. Pregnant 10. History of G6PD deficiency in patients who are candidates to receive ozone therapy. 11. Suspected spondylodiscitis. METHODS: All patients will be subjected to the following: 1\) Clinical assessment: 1. Detailed history taking regarding: duration of pain, the presence of discogenic pain, radicular pain, responseto medical treatment, or previous interventional pain management 2. Neurological examination: motor and sensory examination 3. Assessment of the severity of the neurological symptoms before and 2 weeks,1 and 3 months, after the interventional procedure by a physician who will be blinded to the type of intervention. Modified Oswestry Back Disability Score (MODI): It consisted of low back pain disability index questionnaire about pain intensity, personal care, lifting, standing, walking, sitting, sleeping, social life, travelling and employment/homemaking. Thus, total 10 points; each had score range of 0-5. Hence, total score had range of 0-50. A high MODI score indicates a more severe functional disability related to the pain. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11): It is a scale for assessment of intensity of pain. It ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain. 4. Assessment of patient's satisfaction about the intervention 3 months after the interventional procedure by a physician who will be blinded to the patient's condition and the type of intervention. The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS): It consists of seven items assessing the core domains of patient satisfaction which include treatment satisfaction, explanation of treatment results, clinician care, participation in medical decision making, respect by the clinician, time with the clinician, and satisfaction with hospital/clinic care. Responses scales are 5-point scales. SAPS scores can be interpreted as follows: 0 to 10 = very dissatisfied, 11 to 18 = dissatisfied, 19 to 26 = satisfied, 27 to 28 = very satisfied. 2\) Laboratory assessment: Blood samples will be collected for all included patients in a fasting state, before and three months after the interventional pain management. They will be centrifuged (2000 U/min) at 4C, and stored at 80C. Serum TNFα will be measured with a high-sensitivity TNFα Quantikine immunoassay. 3\) Radiological assessment: Magnetic Resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine will be performed for all patients included in the study. Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI): The following protocols will be used: 1. T1- weighted images (axial, sagittal). 2. T2- weighted images (axial, coronal). 3. Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence. 4) Interventional pain management: Patients will be randomly assigned into one of two groups. In all cases taken to the operating room, routine monitoring was conducted. ECG, noninvasive blood pressure and peripheral arterial saturation (SpO2) was monitored. After the monitoring, patients will be taken the convenient position for the procedure. The C-arm fluoroscopy will be used for imaging during process. (1) Transforaminal steroid injection group: The selected patients will receive transforaminal epidural injection of premixed steroids with local anesthetic in a total volume 2 ml (7 mg Betamethasone and 20 mg Lidocaine 2%) (2) radiofrequency on dorsal root ganglion combined with transforaminal steroids injection group: The needle puncture site determined by fluoroscopy. The Radiofrequency (RF) application was performed to all patients as detailed below: following subcutaneous local anesthesic infiltration, Cosman RFG1A Lesion Generator (Cosman Medical, Inc., Burlington, Massachusetts, USA) was used for RF thermo-ablation. RF cannula (22 g, 10 cm, 5 mm active electrode tip or 5 cm, 2 mm active electrode tip) was placed in a determined puncture site before processing and then the electrode was placed into the cannula. Electrical stimulation at a frequency of 50 Hz was given for sensory testing after 300 to 700 ohms of impedance values were observed. Paresthesia was questioned asking patients whether there is any pressure, compression or increase in pain where the needle tip was while testing. We accepted that the cannula is in the right place when paresthesia occurs below 0.5V. Motor stimulation was given with a frequency of 2 Hz. Motor response did not occur above 1.5 V. RF procedure was started after our location also confirmed by fluoroscopy. Pulse RF current at 42 °C at 20 ms 2 times per second was performed to patients for 360 seconds. The electrode was removed and needle entry site was closed with a sterile spunch after procedure completed. Patients were discharged within 6 hours . Sample size calculation The sample size calculation was done using G\*Power version 3.1.9.2 Software. Effect size f=0.25, α err prob=0.05, Power (1-β err prob)=0.80, Number of groups=2, Corr among rep measures=0.17, Noncentrality parameter λ=8.396, Critical F=4.007, Numerator df=1, Denominator df=58, Total sample size=60, Actual power= 0.813.