Single-center, prospective, controlled, parallel, randomized, single-blind study comparing the conventional extubation technique to two positive pressure extubation techniques on postoperative desaturations
Study realise on university hospital on Lille in France. Patients inclusion is prospective and randomised in three groups. First group : extubation is realised with aspiration in tracheal tube during removal tube Second group : extubation is realised without aspiration but with APL valve set to 20cmH20 Third group : extubation is realised without aspiration but with ventilator parameters were set for PSV mode (inspiratory pressure of 10cmH2O and PEEP identical to that administered in the operating room
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
264
positive pressure during extubation procedure
Hop Claude Huriez Chu Lille
Lille, France
RECRUITINGdesaturations during extubation
saturation \<92%
Time frame: 1 minute after extubation
desaturation postoperatory
saturation\<92%
Time frame: 5 and 30 minutes after extubation
hypoxemia post operatory
PaO2 \<60mmHg
Time frame: 1 and 30 minutes after extubation
atelectasis
Lung ultrasound score (LUS); min = 0, max = 32, higher scores mean is worse outcome
Time frame: 30 minutes after extubation
awakening time
time in seconds
Time frame: through extubation completion, an average 2 minutes
use of oxygen
days Numbers of oxygen therapy, kinesiotherapy, non invasive ventilation
Time frame: day 7
post operative complications
Clavien Dindo Score; min = grade I, max = grade V; higher scores mean is worse outcome
Time frame: day 7 and day 28
feasibility and acceptance of both techniques pressure positive extubation
questionnaire, min = 4, max =20, higher scores mean is worse outcome
Time frame: 15 minutes after extubation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.