Evaluation of Geistlich Fibro-Gide ® and Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft Prior to Orthodontic Maxillary Expansion.

Overview

Teenage children and adults often undergo orthodontic treatment each year to improve their dental esthetics and chewing function. One common problem they present with is having a small maxilla compared to the mandible. The standard of treatment to correct this issue is to expand the maxilla using either a tooth-anchored expander, a bone-anchored expander, or braces. Unfortunately, these treatment options can sometimes result in a loss of gum tissue and supporting structures of the teeth. Certain patients, especially ones that have thin gum tissue, are at a higher risk of this gum tissue loss. Orthodontic treatment for these patients will expand their jaw, causing further pressure on already thin gums. An increasingly common treatment to prevent this is to proactively modify patient's thin tissue surgically prior to their orthodontic treatment so they can withstand the tooth movement. The gold standard of doing this surgical intervention consists of harvesting a connective tissue from the palate which is not well tolerated by the younger population. Our study will evaluate the use of a biomaterial substitute instead of harvesting the patient's own tissue to thicken the gingival tissues. Surgical healing, patient satisfaction, pain index, as well as tissue contour post orthodontic treatment will be assessed thoroughly. This study will help us understand: 1) if biomaterials can be a substitute for traditional autogenous gum grafts to help thicken the patient's gum tissue prior to orthodontic treatment, and 2) if they are able to withstand the pressure of orthodontic movement. This will be the first long-term study of this kind.

This study will be a prospective, single-center, blinded, randomized, split-mouth study. Upon ethics approval from the University of Alberta research information services (ARISE), patients will be recruited from Kaye Edmonton Clinic (KEC). This study evaluates the long-term success of Geistlich Fibro-Gide® in comparison to autogenous connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival phenotype modification of patients with thin gingiva undergoing orthodontic arch expansion in the KEC Graduate Orthodontics clinic. A total of 30 subjects (n=30) will be enrolled in this study. Sample size was estimated based on 80% power, alpha of 0.025, and results from past studies that have been conducted to detect a 10 to 15% difference in gingival tissue recession post orthodontic treatment with a 15% standard deviation (a patient sample of 25 would be ideal). Given the long-term nature of this study, with normal drop-out rates, 30 subjects will ensure an adequate sample size for effective statistical comparison. In this study, 30 patients with bilaterally thin gingival phenotype and minimal keratinized tissues as determined by standardized studies will be treated randomly (left or right maxillary site to be randomized) with either Geistlich Fibro- Gide ® (Test arm) on one side, and autogenous connective tissue graft (Control arm) on the contralateral side of the mouth. Regular post-surgical follow-up visits will be conducted at weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, and up to 2 years post orthodontic treatment completion. Since orthodontic maxillary expansion most commonly affects maxillary molars (predominantly mesial root), canines and both premolars, the study will restrict treatment sites to only these teeth. The selection of these teeth will help distinguish directly anchored teeth (molars), having force applied through wire (premolars) and secondary expansion effect (canine). In this interventional study, each patient will be randomly assigned to receive either Fibro-Gide® or autogenous connective tissue graft (split-mouth, parallel assignment). The outcomes examiner will be blinded to the intervention used by the periodontist. The primary outcome will be measured by standardized periodontal charting and gingival measurements recorded in axiUm at each visit during the study. This will include recording clinical attachment levels, periodontal probing, gingival margin level in relation to cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), gingival phenotype class, thickness and width of keratinized tissue, periapical radiographs, and clinical photographs recorded during each phase of the study for comparative analyses. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed by utilizing standardized pain indices and post surgical wound healing assessments as described in previous studies. Patients eligible to participate in the study will be presented with study details and relevant consent forms. Surgical incision design and suturing will be done in accordance with an envelope technique.