Rationale: B-cell depleting therapies like ocrelizumab are very effective in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). As B cell repopulation varies extensively between individuals (ranging from 27-175 weeks), using a treatment scheme with a fixed infusion interval may be suboptimal. So far personalized adapted treatment of ocrelizumab in RRMS has not been studied in a prospective setting. Objective: Evaluating the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of ocrelizumab when administered in personalized B cell tailored intervals in RRMS patients. Study design: This is a national multicenter randomized controlled trial with 96 week follow-up. Study population: The study population consists of 296 adult RRMS patients who have received ocrelizumab treatment for a minimum of 12 months (2x 300 mg infusion and 1x 600mg infusion). Intervention: Patients will be randomized into the standard interval group (600 mg infusions every 24 weeks) or the personalized interval group in which the infusions will be extended as long as the serum CD19 B cell count is below 10 CD19 cells/µL, determined every 4 weeks. Main study parameters: To conclude non-inferiority of personalized B cell tailored ocrelizumab there will be two co-primary endpoints: 1. the difference of percentage of confirmed relapse-free patients between the two groups after 96 weeks and 2. the difference of percentage of patients free from new/enlarging T2 lesions on MRI between the two groups after 96 weeks. Secondary study parameters are number of confirmed relapses, annualized relapse rate, number of new T2 lesions and brain atrophy on MRI, disability progression, no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), MS disease biomarkers (serum neurofilament light), quality of life, burden of treatment, immunoglobulin levels and (serious) adverse events including occurrence of infections and COVID-19. Furthermore, various immune cell subsets will be studied in relation to ocrelizumab concentration in a subgroup. Nature and extent of the burden and risks: All patients will be subjected to visits every 24 weeks including clinical scoring and questionnaires. Blood samples and MRI scans will be taken and performed every 48 weeks. Continuous assessment of key stroke dynamics on the patients smartphone and monthly digital cognitive test and walk test will be performed in most patients. As CD19 B cells are kept near complete depletion, the estimated risk of recurrence of disease activity is very low.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
296
Personalized B cell tailored ocrelizumab treatment
Amsterdam UMC, location VU
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
Confirmed relapse-free patients
Difference of percentage of confirmed relapse-free patients between the two treatment groups after 96 weeks follow-up.
Time frame: 96 weeks
Change of T2 lesions on brain MR
Difference of percentage of patients without new/enlarging T2 MRI lesions between the two treatment groups after 96 weeks follow-up.
Time frame: 96 weeks
Annualized relapse rate
Clinical relapses during B-cell tailored dosing
Time frame: Baseline, year 1, year 2
Total number of active (new and/or enlarging) T2 lesions on brain MRI
In comparison to the baseline MRI and number of active MRI scans.
Time frame: Baseline, year 1, year 2
Disability progression during follow-up
Disability progression measured on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Disability progression during follow-up
Disability progression measured on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time frame: Baseline, year 1, year 2
Brain atrophy
Rate of brain atrophy comparing baseline MRI and MRI at 96 weeks.
Time frame: Baseline, year 1, year 2
NEDA (no evidence of disease activity)
NEDA is defined as absence of confirmed relapses, MRI disease activity (new/enlarging T2 lesions) and confirmed disability progression.
Time frame: 96 weeks
Change of neurofilament light
Measured in serum
Time frame: 96 weeks
Change of quality of life
Measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)
Time frame: Baseline, year 1, year 2
Change of burden of treatment
measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
Time frame: Baseline, year 1, year 2
Ocrelizumab wearing-off effect
Presence of a possible wearing-off effect measured by a questionnaire developed by the Amsterdam MS Center
Time frame: Baseline, year 1, year 2
IgG levels
Change of IgG levels
Time frame: Baseline, year 1, year 2
Cost analysis
Cost-utility analysis using EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 96 weeks
Disability progression: decrease of hand mobility
Significant decrease of hand mobility measured by an app that analyses key stroke dynamics. The dynamics are measured continuously and analysed every 6 months.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Disability progression: two minute walking distance
Significant decrease of walking distance measured by an app that analyses distance using GPS signal. The test is taken monthly and analysed every 6 months.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Disability progression: cognitive impairment
Significant decrease of cognitive impairment measured by an app that is validated for a digital Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). The test is taken monthly and analysed every 6 months.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months, 18 months, 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.