Allergic rhinitis in children is common. According to the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC) phase III, the global prevalence of allergic rhinitis among children is increasing to 40.1% and the prevalence of allergic rhinitis in Bangkok area in 2018, among children aged 6-7 and 13-14 years was 16.32%. This disease is a global health problem affecting quality of life of patients in daily life, work, study and sleep. Intranasal corticosteroid is the most effective treatment for allergic rhinitis. From real world evidence; most of allergic rhinitis patient use the drug when symptoms worsen. In children, the use of intranasal corticosteroid may cause minor local side effects such as dryness, burning sensation or epistaxis. In some intranasal corticosteroid, long-term use may result in decreased growth compared to placebo which make parents concern. The investigators interested in studying the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid comparing between daily use and as needed use in children with allergic rhinitis. To study the appropriate form of treatment to increase cooperation. Patient will have a better quality of life and reduce the risk of side effects from prolonged use of intranasal corticosteroid. From the literature review, it was found that most studies were conducted among adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis In Thailand in 2020, Thongngam et al. studied the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid was compared between daily use and as needed use in adult patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. The results of the study concluded that the daily use group can reduced more TNSS (total nasal symptoms score) but was not statistically significant and had a greater increase in peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) compared to as needed group. Interestingly, the quality of life assessment (RCQ-36 score) in both2 groups improved equally, In as needed group, the cumulative dose was 51% lower than the daily dose group. The investigators want to compare the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid between daily versus as needed use in children with perennial allergic rhinitis which had not been studied before.
8 week Double-blinded placebo controlled randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy between as-needed and regular use of INCS in children with perennial allergic rhinitis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
68
The investigators want to compare the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid between daily versus as needed use in children with perennial allergic rhinitis which had not been studied before.
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand
TNSS (total nasal symptoms score)
change in TNSS 4 nose symptoms (sneezing, itching nose, watery running nose and blockage) The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 3 each symptoms (\_\_/12) higher scores mean worse outcome.
Time frame: 8 week
VAS score (Visual analog scale score for rhinitis)
change in VAS score Score is 0 - 10 mm higher scores mean worse outcome.
Time frame: 8 week
Ocular symptoms score
Change in ocular symptoms score 2 eye symptoms (tearing eyes, itching eyes/red eyes) The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 3 each symptoms (\_\_/6) Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Time frame: 8 week
Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF)
Change in peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF)
Time frame: 8 week
Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life-36 Questionnaire score (RCQ-36)
Change in rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life-36 Questionnaire score (RCQ-36)
Time frame: 8 week
Medications score Medications score
Change in medications score Medication score Oral and/or topical (eyes or nose) non-sedative H1 antihistamines (H1A)=1 Intranasal corticosteroids (INS) with/without H1A =2 Oral corticosteroids with/without INS, with/without H1A =3 Total daily medication score (dMS) 0-3 Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Time frame: 8 week
Nasal FENO (nasal nitric oxide)
Change in nasal FENO
Time frame: 8 week
Nasal cytology
Change in nasal cytology Grading Nasal Cytograms A. Epithelial cells Normal morphology N Abnormal morphology A Ciliocytophthoria CCP B. Eosinophils, neutrophils 0\* None 0 0.1-1.0\* ½+ 1.1-5.0\* 1+ 6.0-15.0\* 2+ 16.0-20.0\* 3+ \>20.0\* 4+ C. Basophilic cells 0 None 0 0.1-0.3\* ½+ 0.4-1.0\* 1+ 1.1-3.0\* 2+ 3.1-6.0\* 3+ \>6.0\* 4+ D. Bacteria N/A+ None 0 N/A+ 1+ N/A+ 2+ N/A+ 3+ N/A+ 4+ E. Goblet cells# 0-24% 1+ 25-49% 2+ 50-74% 3+ 75-100% 4+ * Mean of cells per 10 high power fields (x1000). + Note presence of intracellular bacteria. # Ratio of goblet cells to epithelial cells, expressed as percent.
Time frame: 8 week
Combined symptom and medication score
Change in combined symptom and medication score Cumulative of (nasal symptoms score + ocular symptoms score)/3 and medication score The minimum score is 0 maximum score is 6, (\_\_/6) Higher scores mean worse outcome. Pfaar et al., EAACI Position Paper: 'clinical outcomes used in allergen immunotherapy trials, Allergy 69 (2014) 854-867
Time frame: 8 week
Correlation VAS versus TNSS, PNIF and RCQ-36
VAS score (Visual analog scale score for rhinitis) total nasal symptoms score Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life-36 Questionnaire score (RCQ-36)
Time frame: 8 week
Cumulative INCs dose
weight the nasal spray bottles (both Fluticasone furoate nasal spray and normal saline nasal spray) on digital scale each visit and record to compare INCS used in each group
Time frame: 8 week
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.