Modulating the gut microbiome to improve response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors is an active area of study. Prebiotic substances (compounds which positively shift the gut microbiome) are a reliable and safe method of gut microbiome modulation. Data suggest that the berry Camu Camu (CC), also known as Myrciaria dubia has prebiotic potential to enrich Akkermansia muciniphila, a bacterium shown to alleviate metabolic disorders and improve ICI efficacy in preclinical models. Our primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of CC prebiotic in patients with advanced NSCLC and melanoma in combination with standard-of-care ICI.
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) now represent the backbone therapy for patients with advanced or unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and metastatic melanoma. However, only a minority of patients obtain durable complete responses. In patients with advanced NSCLC with a Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression level below 50%, the standard-of-care is pembrolizumab plus platinum doublet chemotherapy, with overall survival (OS) at 2 years reaching 46%. In patients with advanced melanoma, combination of anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) and anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) is a key standard-of-care option. In a study in patients with advanced melanoma evaluating the combination regimen of nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, OS at 5 years was 52% in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 44% in the nivolumab group, as compared with 26% in the ipilimumab group. Despite these improvements in outcomes with ICI, these survival and response rates remain suboptimal, and therefore, developing strategies to safely increase ICI efficacy or reverse ICI resistance represents an unmet clinical need. Moreover, there are currently no available options for patients who progress on standard-of-care ICI. Recent pre-clinical studies have demonstrated the role of the gut microbiome in improving ICI efficacy, and therefore, efforts to modulate the gut microbiome is an active area of study. Indeed, two phase I clinical studies evaluating gut microbiome modulation with fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) demonstrated increase in objective response rate compared to historical controls. Moreover, studies in over 8,000 patients (including patients with NSCLC and melanoma) have confirmed the independent and negative role of antibiotics (ATB) in patients receiving ICI, further validating the important role of the gut microbiome. Therefore, it is clear that modulation of the gut microbiome represents a promising therapeutic strategy in improving ICI efficacy. Other than FMT, prebiotic substances (compounds which positively shift the gut microbiome) are a reliable and safe method of gut microbiome modulation. Data suggest that the berry Camu Camu (CC), also known as Myrciaria dubia has prebiotic potential to enrich Akkermansia muciniphila, a bacterium shown to alleviate metabolic disorders and improve ICI efficacy in preclinical models. Our preclinical work showed that CC oral supplementation significantly decreased tumor size and had an additive effect in combination with anti-PD-1 in two murine tumor models, MCA-205 (anti-PD-1 sensitive) and E0771 (anti-PD-1 resistant). Flow cytometry and RNA seq analysis of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and T cell depletion showed that CC's anti-tumor effect was dependent on CD8+ T cells. Moreover, CC supplementation was able to transform an anti-PD-1-resistant tumor into an anti-PD-1-sensitive tumor. ATB administration inhibited CC activity, proving that the activity of CC was dependent on the gut microbiome. The 16S rRNA profiling of murine fecal samples showed that CC increased bacterial diversity and enrichment of beneficial bacteria. CC is available over the counter as a natural prebiotic and has been approved for human clinical trials in obesity (NCT04130321) and HIV (NCT04058392).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
45
Evaluate the safety and tolerability of CC prebiotic in addition to ICI in patients with NSCLC and melanoma
CISSS de la Montérégie-Centre- Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne
Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Incidence of treatment-related adverse events (safety and tolerability) in patients with NSCLC and melanoma
Safety of administration of CamuCamu in the Safety Analysis Dataset. The assessment of safety will be based on the incidence of AEs, SAEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, and deaths in the Safety Analysis dataset. Treatment-related adverse events will be graded according to the NCI CTCAE v5.0. of CC prebiotic in addition to ICI in patients with NSCLC and melanoma on the basis of the following endpoints: * Incidence and severity of AEs, with severity determined according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0) * Change from baseline in targeted vital signs * Change from baseline in targeted clinical laboratory test results
Time frame: At the end of every cycle (each cycle is 21 or 28 days, depending of the ICI treatment) until disease progression, then, every 3 months thereafter (for up to a total of 2 years)
Objective response rate in the NSCLC and melanoma cohort by RECIST criteria.
To evaluate the preliminary activity of CC in combination with single-agent anti-PD-1 in patients with melanoma, and in combination with anti-PD-1 and chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC as measured by ORR (ORR; the rate of complete response plus partial response, as per the iRECIST and RECIST criteria). Objective Response Rate (ORR) as defined by the proportion of patients with NSCLC and melanoma whose Best Overall Response (BOR) is either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by iRECIST, based on RECIST v1.1. BOR is defined as the best response designation over the study as a whole, recorded between the dates of first dose until the last tumor assessment prior to subsequent therapy. CR or PR determinations included in the BOR assessment must be confirmed by a second scan performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response are first met.
Time frame: At 3 and 6 months, then at 12 months and up to 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.