The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential effectiveness of 24 weeks of MMF within previously discovered immunologically defined subsets of SLE patients. Treatment effects will be evaluated within the individual immunologically-homogenous subsets defined at screening. This study will also explore and compare pre-randomization gene expression patterns among responders and non-responders to MMF and MMF plus voclosporin, use comprehensive immunophenotyping to study the immunologic changes that accompany treatment- induced disease improvement and to better understand immunologic changes associated with the loss of clinical response.
The study was conducted in 3 stages with a maximum participant follow-up time of 56 weeks. Stage 1 was a treatment withdrawal period lasting up to 4 weeks where consenting participants receive up to 3 intramuscular injections of a long-acting corticosteroid to achieve amelioration of symptoms. In addition, participants withdraw from all other treatments for lupus with the following exceptions: (i) as needed (PRN) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory treatments may be started or continued, (ii) PRN topicals may be continued, (iii) hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, or quinacrine may be continued at any stable dose, and (iv) prednisone, if\<= 10 mg/day, may be continued at stable doses but not started. Qualifying participants from Stage 1 were randomized (1:1) into Stage 2 to receive either MMF or placebo for MMF for up to 48 weeks. Participants who experienced a Stage 2 treatment failure at or before the Week 24 visit and a corticosteroid injection was deemed sufficient for treatment without new or increased lupus medication were eligible to re-randomize (1:1) into Stage 3 to receive either MMF + Voclosporin or MMF + Placebo for Voclosporin for up to 24 Weeks. Participants who did not experience a Stage 2 treatment failure at or before the Stage 2 Week 48 visit were to return for an End of Study/Safety Follow-up visit 4 weeks after the final dose of study-provided medication. Similarly, participants who did not experience a Stage 3 treatment failure at or before the Stage 3 Week 24 visits were asked to return for an End of Study/Safety Follow-up visit 4 weeks after the final dose of study provided medication.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
12
Stage 2 Dosing: Week 1: Participants will receive 500mg MMF/Placebo twice daily Week 2: Participants will receive 500mg/Placebo in the morning and 1,000mg MMF/Placebo in the evening Weeks 3-48: Participants will receive 1000mg MMF/Placebo twice daily
Stage 2 Dosing: Week 1: Participants will receive 500mg MMF/Placebo twice daily Week 2: Participants will receive 500mg/Placebo in the morning and 1,000mg MMF/Placebo in the evening Weeks 3-48: Participants will receive 1000mg MMF/Placebo twice daily
Weeks 1-24: 23.7 mg Voclosporin (3 x 7.9 capsules) twice daily
Weeks 1-24: 23.7 mg Placebo for Voclosporin (3 x 7.9 capsules) twice daily
Stage 3 Dosing: Participants who received placebo MMF in Stage 2: * Week 1: Participants will receive 500mg MMF plus matching placebo for MMF (to appear like a 1000mg dose) twice daily * Week 2: Participants will receive 500mg plus matching placebo for MMF (to appear like a 1000mg dose) and 1000mg in divided doses * Weeks 3-24: 1000mg MMF twice daily Participants who received MMF in Stage 2 • Week 1-24: 1000mg MMF twice daily
UCLA Medical Center: Division of Rheumatology
Los Angeles, California, United States
Yale University School of Medicine: Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Emory University School of Medicine: Division of Rheumatology
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Piedmont Healthcare: Rheumatology Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital: Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research: Center for Autoimmune and Musculoskeletal Diseases
Manhasset, New York, United States
Columbia University Medical Center: Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology
New York, New York, United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Thurston Arthritis Research Center: Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
PennState Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center: Division of Rheumatology
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
The Percentage of Participants Who Experience a Stage 2 Treatment Failure at or Before the Stage 2 Week 24 Visit.
Treatment failure is defined as the first occurrence after randomization (Stage 2) of any of the following events: 1. Methylprednisolone acetate injection or treatment with a new or increased lupus medication, except the occasional use of corticosteroids for reasons not associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) flare 2. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) flare, defined as any item marked new or worse that could support a BILAG A (severe flare) or 2 organs with items marked new or worse that could support a BILAG B (moderate flare), and if the participant's condition is deemed by the investigator to be "moderately worse" or "much worse" compared to the day of randomization, as assessed by the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) 3. Premature permanent discontinuation of study-assigned treatment for any reason
Time frame: From Baseline to Stage 2 Week 24
Clinical Response in Stage 2, Defined by the BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) at Stage 2 Week 24.
The BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) is a composite index used to assess disease activity in SLE. A BICLA response is defined as meeting all of the following criteria: * Improvement of all Screening BILAG A scores to B, C or D * Improvement of all Screening BILAG B scores to C or D * No new BILAG A score among organs scored as B, C, D, or E at Screening * \<= 1 new BILAG B score among organs scored as C, D, or E at Screening * No worsening of the Hybrid Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (H-SLEDAI) * Less than a 10% increase (worsening) in the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Participants who experience treatment failure prior to Stage 2 Week 24 visit are imputed as BICLA Non-responders at Stage 2 Week 24. Participants who do not have evaluable data at Stage 2 Week 24 for reasons other than a treatment failure are not imputed.
Time frame: Stage 2 Week 24
The Proportion of Participants Who Experience a Stage 3 Treatment Failure, After Stage 3 Re-randomization at or Before Completing Stage 3 Week 24.
Treatment failure is defined as the first occurrence after re-randomization (Stage 3) of any of the following events: 1. Methylprednisolone acetate injection or treatment with a new or increased lupus medication, except the occasional use of corticosteroids for reasons not associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) flare 2. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) flare, defined as any item marked new or worse that could support a BILAG A (severe flare) or 2 organs with items marked new or worse that could support a BILAG B (moderate flare), and if the participant's condition is deemed by the investigator to be "moderately worse" or "much worse" compared to the day of randomization, as assessed by the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) 3. Premature permanent discontinuation of study-assigned treatment for any reason
Time frame: From re-randomization to Stage 3 Week 24
Time to Treatment Failure in Stage 3, Defined as the Interval From the Day of Stage 3 Randomization Until the Day of Treatment Failure.
Treatment failure is defined as the first occurrence after re-randomization (Stage 3) of any of the following events: 1. Methylprednisolone acetate injection or treatment with a new or increased lupus medication, except the occasional use of corticosteroids for reasons not associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) flare 2. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) flare, defined as any item marked new or worse that could support a BILAG A (severe flare) or 2 organs with items marked new or worse that could support a BILAG B (moderate flare), and if the participant's condition is deemed by the investigator to be "moderately worse" or "much worse" compared to the day of randomization, as assessed by the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) 3. Premature permanent discontinuation of study-assigned treatment for any reason
Time frame: Start of Stage 3 up to the day of treatment failure
Clinical Response in Stage 3, Defined by the BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) at Stage 3 Week 24.
The BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) is a composite index used to assess disease activity in SLE. A BICLA response is defined as meeting all of the following criteria: * Improvement of all Screening BILAG A scores to B, C or D * Improvement of all Screening BILAG B scores to C or D * No new BILAG A score among organs scored as B, C, D, or E at Screening * \<= 1 new BILAG B score among organs scored as C, D, or E at Screening * No worsening of the Hybrid Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (H-SLEDAI) * Less than a 10% increase (worsening) in the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Participants who experience treatment failure prior to Stage 3 Week 24 visit are imputed as BICLA Non-responders at Stage 2 Week 24. Participants who do not have evaluable data at Stage 3 Week 24 for reasons other than a treatment failure are not imputed.
Time frame: Stage 3 Week 24
The Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Related Adverse Events (AEs) in Stage 2
Defined as adverse events that emerged during Stage 2 that are of Grade 3 or higher with a relationship to Stage 2 study drug of Possible or Definite.
Time frame: Stage 2 Day 0 up to Stage 2 Week 48
The Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Related Adverse Events (AEs) in Stage 3
Defined as adverse events that emerged during Stage 3 that are of Grade 3 or higher with a relationship to Stage 3 study drug of Possible or Definite.
Time frame: After Stage 3 re-randomization Day 0 to Stage 3 Week 24
The Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Infections in Stage 1
Defined as infection adverse events that emerged during Stage 1 and are of Grade 3 or higher.
Time frame: Day -28 to Day -1
The Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Infections in Stage 2
Defined as infection adverse events that emerged during Stage 2 and are of Grade 3 or higher.
Time frame: Stage 2 Day 0 up to Stage 2 Week 48
The Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Infections in Stage 3
Defined as infection adverse events that emerged during Stage 3 and are of Grade 3 or higher.
Time frame: After Stage 3 re-randomization Day 0 to Stage 3 Week 24
The Incidence of Renal Dysfunction in Stage 1
Defined as Grade 3 or higher chronic kidney disease with eGFR \< 30 ml/min per 1.73 m\^2
Time frame: Day -28 to Day -1
The Incidence of Renal Dysfunction in Stage 2
Defined as Grade 3 or higher chronic kidney disease with eGFR \< 30 ml/min per 1.73 m\^2
Time frame: Stage 2 Day 0 up to Stage 2 Week 48
The Incidence of Renal Dysfunction in Stage 3
Defined as Grade 3 or higher chronic kidney disease with eGFR \< 30 ml/min per 1.73 m\^2
Time frame: After Stage 3 re-randomization Day 0 to Stage 3 Week 24
The Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Hypertension in Stage 1
Defined as a systolic blood pressure \>= 160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of \>= 100 mm Hg
Time frame: Day -28 to Day -1
The Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Hypertension in Stage 2
Defined as a systolic blood pressure \>= 160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of \>= 100 mm Hg
Time frame: Stage 2 Day 0 up to Stage 2 Week 48
The Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Hypertension in Stage 3
Defined as a systolic blood pressure \>= 160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of \>= 100 mm Hg
Time frame: After Stage 3 re-randomization Day 0 to Stage 3 Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.