The Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic (NSAC) is a publicly funded specialist outpatient health service, which is uniquely available for the work force. The overall aim of the NSAC is prevention of sickness absence, promote return to work (RTW) among those on sickness absence and prevent long term disability benefit dependency. In addition to being a health service, the NSAC has a focus on work and functional recovery, including also non-health related factors. Patients can be referred by general practitioners for mental health problems and musculoskeletal problems. The NSAC has a lower threshold for severity than specialist health services generally, and in particular for mental health problems. The efficacy of this service is unknown. The NSAC Efficacy Study is a randomized controlled multicentre trial which aims to assess the effect of the NSAC service. "Helse i Arbeid" is the Norwegian name for NSAC, and the Norwegian abbreviation is "HiA". The Norwegian study name is HIANOR. The NSAC Efficacy Study involves five different NSACs across northern Norway, and will recruit 2500 patients, randomized to in equal proportions to three treatment arms: 1. NSAC - rapid: treatment at the NSAC at- or within 4 weeks 2. NSAC - ordinary: treatment at the NSAC after 10-14 weeks 3. NSAC - active control: monodisciplinary examination at the NSAC close to diagnosis-specific deadline for examination as suggested by guidelines (8-26 weeks, the majority at the end of this interval) The overall aim is to assess the effect of the NSAC service, with the hypothesis that the NSAC service is superior to what resembles treatment as usual (TAU) for outcomes such as return to work or improved health (waiting list control). Many of the diagnoses or problems for which patients are referred to the NSACs naturally improve regardless of health interventions, and - as of date - no research has been conducted to assess the efficacy of the service.
The Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic (NSAC) is a publicly funded specialist outpatient health service, which is uniquely available for the work force. The overall aim of the NSAC is prevention of sickness absence, promote return to work (RTW) among those on sickness absence and prevent long term disability benefit dependency. In addition to being a health service, the NSAC has a focus on work and functional recovery, including also non-health related factors. Patients can be referred by general practitioners for mental health problems and musculoskeletal problems. The NSAC has a lower threshold for severity than specialist health services generally, and in particular for mental health problems. The efficacy of this service is unknown. The NSAC Efficacy Study is part of a broader project, the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic Study (NSACS). The NSACS currently has two sources of funding: Northern Norway Regional Health Authority and The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration and involves two RCTs: NSAC Efficacy and NSAC Nudge and fifteen work packages concerning health economics, scalability, implementation, profiling of patient groups, and non-RCT related research questions to improve understanding of the patient group and their challenges. To do this the project will use patient survey data, clinician-reported procedures, opinions and outcomes, linked to registry data for work benefits and health service use. The randomized controlled trial NSAC Efficacy is the subject of this trial registration. The NSAC Efficacy Study is a naturalistic randomized controlled multicentre trial, carried out in northern Norway and involving five NSACs. The study invites 2500 patients, randomized to either of three treatment arms: 1. NSAC rapid: treatment at the NSAC at- or within 4 weeks 2. NSAC ordinary: treatment at the NSAC after 10-14 weeks 3. NSAC - active control: monodisciplinary examination at the NSAC close to diagnosis-specific deadline for examination as suggested by guidelines (8-26 weeks, the majority at the end of this interval) The NSACs are staffed by teams of medical doctors specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation, psychologists, physiotherapists, and employment counsellors with experience from case management in the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration (NAV). All patients are asked to complete an electronic survey about their mental health and musculoskeletal pain, work conditions, motivation for work and barriers for return to work (RTW). The control group only completes the survey on health, and only on either mental health or musculoskeletal pain, according to referral diagnosis. The survey tool manages the randomization algorithm. The NSAC is a relatively new clinical service, available for the labour force, and publicly funded with the intention to reduce sickness absence and prevent retirement from the labour force and transitions to disability benefits. The NSAC clinic welcomes patients with the most common diagnoses for sickness absence and is supposed to have a low threshold. There is no single alternative clinical service for similar patients outside the labour force, thus no single treatment as usual (TAU) alternative. Service availability will depend on diagnosis and severity: * The majority of patients eligible for treatment in the NSAC referred with mental disorders would not be eligible for treatment in specialist psychiatric services as conditions in most cases would be too mild. The most common treatment alternative would be treatment at the general practitioners. * For patients referred for musculoskeletal problems, some may be eligible for consultations and treatment at physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinics. For those not eligible, the general practitioner is the most common alternative, and other options such as private physiotherapists. Eligibility criteria may vary between catchment areas. * All alternatives to the NSAC would be without employment counsellors, little cross disciplinary assessment, and little to no focus on work and functional rehabilitation. The active control group aims to be comparable to TAU, and differs from the NSAC in the following respects: 1. Patients receive a monodisciplinary examination from either a doctor, physiotherapist of psychologist at the NSAC. The focus of the examination is on health-related factors. The patients will not receive further follow-up at the clinic beyond the first examination. Upon indication, the patient is referred to other treatment or examination outside of the NSAC. 2. Employment counsellors are not involved in patient consultations or in discussions about patients. 3. Patients in the active control group will not be posed questions concerning work, motivation for work or barriers for return to work. Patients will during registration in Tivian be classified as having predominantly either musculoskeletal- or common mental disorders, and this will dictate the type of questions posed: musculoskeletal patients will be asked questions on musculoskeletal factors but not psychological factors, while patients will common mental disorders will be asked questions about psychological factors but not musculoskeletal issues. For patients being examined by a psychologist, if issues concerning musculoskeletal health arise, the patient is asked to discuss these with his/her GP. If issues concerning mental health arise which requires competence beyond what the physiotherapist possesses, the physiotherapist may confer with the medical doctor at NSAC. 4. The clinician is not to take initiative to discussing work-related factors with the patient, and as far as possible avoid these becoming central topics of the consultation. If the patient on his/her own initiative brings up such topics, the clinician is not restricted from addressing them. 5. Employment counsellors are not part of patient discussions prior to examination. 6. Meetings or discussions about patients are kept within profession; i.e. a physiotherapist is allowed to discuss his/her patient with other physiotherapists if need be. The data necessary to answer the research questions are gathered from national registries via personal identifier, registry data on population level, questionnaires filled out by the patient (data on health and working conditions) and questionnaires filled out by the clinician (data on number of treatments, diagnosis, professions involved, and types of treatment provided). The patient questionnaire covers 9 themes, split in two sections. Section 1 covers health, and includes musculoskeletal problems, mental health, and other health related issues (such as alcohol consumption, medication, and physical activity). Section 2 includes working conditions (including inter alia questions on social support, work/family conflict and bullying), barriers for RTW, labour market affiliation, other personal aspects (such as demography and motivation for work), questionnaires for health economic evaluation (such as the EQ-5D) and expectations for treatment. By and large the questionnaire consists of test batteries which have been validated for specific topics. To reduce the number of questions posed to each patient, the baseline questionnaire will employ index questions which have proven psychometric properties in terms of factor loading or similar, meaning that if a problem on a specific topic such as neck pain is not indicated, the patient will not be presented with the Neck Disability Index questionnaire. The patient questionnaires will be filled out electronically at before first treatment and at 6- and 12 months after first treatment. In addition, before treatments, patients will be given shorter versions of the same questionnaire to be filled out at the clinic. These shorter questionnaires will consist of questions to which the patient at baseline indicated a high score, and thus includes more relevant information to the clinician. In the NSAC Efficacy Study, receiving treatment at NSACs presupposes consent to participate in research, as the effect of the treatment is as of date unknown. Hence, receiving treatment at the NSAC is not necessarily superior to other available health services. Other available health services that may be utilized by patients serving in the control groups include mono-disciplinary treatment by physiotherapists, psychologists, general practitioners, gyms, electronically delivered self-help tools etc. All patients referred to NSACs will be offered treatment, but patients that decline to participate in research are provided an examination in line with randomization arm #3.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
2,500
NSAC is an outpatient service delivered under the auspices of the specialist health care sector to patients currently on sick leave or at risk for long-term sickness absence. The service is staffed by medical doctors specialising in muskuloskeletal health, physiotherapists, psychologists and welfare sector counsellors, and aims to provide patients with a multi-diciplinary clarification or treatment of problems with the intent of improved function and return to work. Clinicians are provided survey information on the patients potential health problems, motivation for work, barriers for return to work and work environment prior to consultation. In this intervention arm, patients are offered treatment within 4 weeks of referral.
NSAC is an outpatient service delivered under the auspices of the specialist health care sector to patients currently on sick leave or at risk for long-term sickness absence. The service is staffed by medical doctors specialising in muskuloskeletal health, physiotherapists, psychologists and welfare sector counsellors, and aims to provide patients with a multi-diciplinary clarification or treatment of problems with the intent of improved function and return to work. Clinicians are provided survey information on the patients potential health problems, motivation for work, barriers for return to work and work environment prior to consultation. In this intervention arm, patients are offered treatment at 10-14 weeks after referral.
The active control intervention is provided by the NSAC personnel, but patients are offered a single monodisciplinary examination close to the end of the diagnosis-specific deadline suggested in guidelines, which will vary between 8-26 weeks. Employment counsellors may not be involved in consultations, other cross-disciplinary consultations are restricted, and work-related factors are not to be focused on during examination. Clinicians are provided survey information only on the patient's potential health problems prior to consultation. Patients are provided a health-focused examination, with the aim of symptom-relief.
Helse I Arbeid Nordlandssykehuset
Bodø, Nordland, Norway
RECRUITINGHelse I Arbeid Helgelandssykehuset
Sandnessjøen, Nordland, Norway
RECRUITINGHelsepartner Rehabilitering Alta
Alta, Troms Og Finnmark, Norway
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHelse I Arbeid Finnmarkssykehuset
Kirkenes, Troms Og Finnmark, Norway
RECRUITINGHelse I Arbeid Universitetssykehuset Nord-Norge
Tromsø, Troms Og Finnmark, Norway
RECRUITINGFunctional recovery: employment
Employment during first 365 days post baseline survey, based on registry data and self-report.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Functional recovery: sickness absence
Sickness absence during first 365 days post baseline survey, based on registry data and self-report.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Functional recovery: application for rehabilitation benefits
Application for rehabilitation benefits during first 365 days post baseline survey, based on registry data and self-report.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Functional recovery: employment long term
Employment during 5-and 10-year period post baseline survey, all based on registry data.
Time frame: 5 and 10 years post baseline survey
Functional recovery: sickness absence long term
Sickness absence during 5-and 10-year period post baseline survey, all based on registry data.
Time frame: 5 and 10 years post baseline survey
Functional recovery: rehabilitation benefits long term
Rehabilitation benefits during 5-and 10-year period post baseline survey, all based on registry data.
Time frame: 5 and 10 years post baseline survey
Functional recovery: disability benefits long term
Disability benefits during 5-and 10-year period post baseline survey, all based on registry data.
Time frame: 5 and 10 years post baseline survey
Mental health
Changes in self-reported mental health between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist - 10 (HSCL-10).
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Anxiety
Changes in self-reported anxiety between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The instrument is provided to patients upon indication, defined as a HSCL-10 score \> 1.4
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Depressive symptoms
Changes in self-reported depression between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The instrument is provided to patients upon indication, defined as a HSCL-10 score \> 1.4
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Sleep
Changes in self-reported sleep between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using 3 questions commonly used to diagnose sleeping disorder according to the DSM-IV criteria for insomnia.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Health Anxiety
Changes in self-reported health anxiety between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using the Whitely Index. All patients are asked the first question in the test battery, and the entire instrument is provided to patients with a score of \>3 on this question
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Subjective health complaints
Changes in subjective healthbetween baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using a modified version of the Ursin Health Inventory.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Back pain
Changes in self-reported back pain between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). All patients are asked whether they suffer from musculoskeletal pain, and if present, they are provided questions on localization of pain. In case of back pain, patients are provided the ODI.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Neck pain
Changes in self-reported neck pain between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). All patients are asked whether they suffer from musculoskeletal pain, and if present, they are provided questions on localization of pain. In case of neck pain, patients are provided the NDI.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Pain intensity
Changes in self-reported pain intensity between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using a visual analogue scale scored between 0 and 10. All patients are asked whether they suffer from musculoskeletal pain, and if present, they are provided questions on pain intensity during rest and activity.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Fear avoidance
Changes in self-reported fear avoidance between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). All patients are asked whether they suffer from musculoskeletal pain, and if present, they are provided the FABQ.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Physical activity
Changes in self-reported level of physical between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using the Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale (SGPALS).
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Fatigue
Changes in self-reported fatigue between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey, measured using the Fatigue Assessment Scale. All patients are asked the first question in the test battery, and the entire instrument is provided to patients with a score of ≥ 3 on this question
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Pain localization
Changes in self-reported localization of pain between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey. All patients are asked whether they suffer from musculoskeletal pain, and if present, they are provided questions on localization of pain.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Cause of pain
Changes in self-reported cause of pain between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey. All patients are asked whether they suffer from musculoskeletal pain, and if present, they are provided questions on the believed cause of pain.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey
Self-reported diagnosis
Changes in self-reported diagnoses between baseline survey and 6- and 12 months post baseline survey. The respondent is asked whether he/she thinks they have Covid-19 sequelae, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, whiplash, fibromyalgia, hypermobility, irritable bowel syndrome or food intolerance, or whether they have been diagnosed with either of these by health personnel.
Time frame: 12 months post baseline survey