This is a pilot study of a digital training task called GAMBIT. This study will be the first to examine potential relationships between GAMBIT task completion and brain circuit flexibility, behavior, and symptoms in participants with PTSD.
This is a single-site pilot study for the GAMBIT intervention, which is a computerized task that addresses behavioral inhibition. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the GAMBIT task improves mental health symptoms associated with PTSD over time. The secondary objective of this study is to determine whether the GAMBIT task promotes flexibility in inhibitory control network as determined by functional neuroimaging. Additional laboratory measures associated with cognitive flexibility, and clinician and patient-rated symptom data, will be collected.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
The GAMBIT task is a novel inhibitory control task. Participants in the Healthy Control group will receive the GAMBIT intervention repeatedly over the study period.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) at Baseline
The CAPS is a structured clinical interview designed to assess the essential features of PTSD. A total symptom severity score is calculated on a scale of 0-80, with a higher score representing greater symptom severity.
Time frame: Baseline
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) at Day 23
The CAPS is a structured clinical interview designed to assess the essential features of PTSD. A total symptom severity score is calculated on a scale of 0-80, with a higher score representing greater symptom severity.
Time frame: Day 23
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) at Day 52
The CAPS is a structured clinical interview designed to assess the essential features of PTSD. A total symptom severity score is calculated on a scale of 0-80, with a higher score representing greater symptom severity.
Time frame: Day 52
Inhibitory Control Network Flexibility at Baseline
Network flexibility will be determined from resting state FMRI-derived metrics using relatively novel statistical techniques.
Time frame: Baseline
Inhibitory Control Network Flexibility at Day 52
Network flexibility will be determined from resting state FMRI-derived metrics using relatively novel statistical techniques.
Time frame: Day 52
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) at Baseline
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a widely used clinical self-report scale to evaluate current symptoms of PTSD. Each question on the 20-item checklist corresponds to a symptom of PTSD in the DSM-5. A total severity score is calculated on a scale of 0-80, with a higher score indicating greater severity.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) Weekly for Weeks 1-6
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a widely used clinical self-report scale to evaluate current symptoms of PTSD. Each question on the 20-item checklist corresponds to a symptom of PTSD in the DSM-5. A total severity score is calculated on a scale of 0-80, with a higher score indicating greater severity.
Time frame: Weekly [Weeks 1-6]
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) at Day 23
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a widely used clinical self-report scale to evaluate current symptoms of PTSD. Each question on the 20-item checklist corresponds to a symptom of PTSD in the DSM-5. A total severity score is calculated on a scale of 0-80, with a higher score indicating greater severity.
Time frame: Day 23
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) at Day 52
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a widely used clinical self-report scale to evaluate current symptoms of PTSD. Each question on the 20-item checklist corresponds to a symptom of PTSD in the DSM-5. A total severity score is calculated on a scale of 0-80, with a higher score indicating greater severity.
Time frame: Day 52
Combined Think/No-Think and Go/No-Go Paradigm
The combined Think/No-Think and Go/No-Go paradigm requires participants to learn 35 cue-target word pairs (for approximately 15 minutes) and then asked to alternatively suppress, recall, or think about the cue-target word pairs, when prompted. The percentage of correctly processed trials (go/think trials and no-go/no-think trials) are calculated per block, on a scale from 0% (0/35 trials) to 100% (35/35 trails), with higher recall scores on no-go/no-think trials indicating worse inhibitory control.
Time frame: up to 52 days
Face-Stroop Task
The Face-Stroop task is a modified version of the widely used Stroop task which assesses reaction time between congruent and incongruent stimuli. During the Face-Stroop task, participants are simultaneously presented with images of emotional faces and emotional words (e.g., "Happy", "Sad"), with some trials presenting congruent stimuli (happy face + "Happy") and other trials presenting incongruent stimuli (happy face + "Sad"), and asked to identify the faces and words separately. Variables of interest include reaction time (range 250-1000 milliseconds, with lower RT indicating better performance) and accuracy (0-100%, with greater accuracy denoting better performance).
Time frame: up to 52 days