Several studies have recently tested the use of muscle vibration for the rehabilitation of patients after a stroke. When applied in a repeated and focused manner, this vibration appears to promote the recovery of functional capacities through the mechanisms of neuromuscular plasticity. These results are encouraging, showing in particular a significant decrease in spasticity in post-stroke patients in the chronic phase (\> 6 months after stroke), on the upper and/or lower limbs. However, very few studies have been done on this type of early intervention. Muscle vibration may therefore be an innovative therapy to complement the care that is currently offered in the acute and subacute phase of post-stroke rehabilitation. Moreover, brain plasticity after a stroke is particularly high in the 3 months after the accident, but the vast majority of studies having evaluated the impact of vibration in a chronic phase (\> 12 months post-stroke). It is likely, however, that the influence of vibration, particularly on brain plasticity, is increased in the acute or subacute phase (first 6 months). To date, the effect of vibration on spinal cord or cortical plasticity has not been quantified in the acute or subacute phase. This is why the second part of this project (phase 2) aims to systematically evaluate and quantify the neuroplastic and functional effects of post-stroke vibration in the early phase. Phase 1 - Validation of a method for measuring spasticity (upper limb) with an isokinetic dynamometer 32 patients with ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke (\> 3 months after stroke) Phase 2 - Use of this objective technique to measure the effect of a muscle vibration protocol to limit the onset of spasticity in a population of 100 patients following a stroke, in the acute or subacute phase (\< 6 weeks post-stroke) in a randomized trial: * intervention group: usual rehabilitation + muscle vibrations * control group: usual rehabilitation + placebo vibrations
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
165
Measurement of elbow/wrist spasticity
1 session of 10 minutes
3 times/week for 6 weeks
3 times/week for 6 weeks
SSR Marguerite BOUCICAUT
Chalon-sur-Saône, France
RECRUITINGChu Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon, France
RECRUITINGPhase 1: Joint angle (elbow or wrist of the limb contralateral to the brain injury)
Joint angle (elbow or wrist of the limb contralateral to the brain injury) at the onset of a spastic contraction (maximum intensity of resistance to mobilization) recorded by isokinetic dynamometer on a wheelchair during the initial visit
Time frame: at baseline
Phase 2: Scoring wrist flexor muscle spasticity
Scoring of wrist flexor muscle spasticity by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), at the beginning of the study and at 6 weeks (end of intervention).
Time frame: at 6 weeks
Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
Time frame: at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months
Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb
Pain (Visual analog scale)
Time frame: at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months
Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb
tiredness (Visual analog scale)
Time frame: at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months
Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist
Angle of catch of spasticity measured by an isokinetic ergometer (in degree), only in Dijon
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist
Angle of end of spasticity measured by an isokinetic ergometer (in degree), only in Dijon
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist
Measured by an isokinetic ergometer : Torque developed during the spastic reaction that is determined by the angles of catch and end (in Newton per Meter (Nm)). It will be reported as a score difference in comparison to the reference curve: root mean square error (RMSE) only in Dijon
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Spasticity of the paretic limb at the elbow
Angle of catch of spasticity measured by an isokinetic ergometer (in degree), only in Dijon
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Spasticity of the paretic limb at the elbow
Angle of end of spasticity measured by an isokinetic ergometer (in degree), only in Dijon
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Spasticity of the paretic limb at the elbow
Measured by an isokinetic ergometer : Torque developed during the spastic reaction that is determined by the angles of catch and end (in Newton per Meter (Nm)). It will be reported as a score difference in comparison to the reference curve: root mean square error (RMSE) only in Dijon
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Spasticity of the paretic limb (wrist and elbow)
Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Neuroplasticity modifications evaluated on the flexor carpi radialis
at spinal level (H-reflex and M-wave), Only in Dijon.
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Neuroplasticity modifications evaluated on the flexor carpi radialis
at corticospinal level by transcranial magnetic stimulation (MEP and SICI), Only in Dijon.
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Neuroplasticity modifications evaluated on the flexor carpi radialis
at cortical level by electroencephalogram : The Delta, Theta, Alpha and Beta bands will be evaluated. ERD/ERS will be calculated during the resting states and the vibrations periods, principally over the C3-C4 electrodes (10-20 system). Only in Dijon.
Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Correlation between the severity of spasticity at the wrist and the spinal excitability
Tools: MAS scores (scale) and the amplitude of the H-reflex (in Volt) Logistic regression Only in Dijon.
Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 6 months
Correlation between the severity of spasticity at the wrist and cortical excitability
Tools: MAS scores (scale) and EEG ratio (laterality coefficient) Logistic regression Only in Dijon.
Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 6 months
Correlation between the severity of spasticity at the wrist and cortical excitability
Tools: MAS scores (scale) and EEG ratio (ERD alpha and beta bands) Logistic regression Only in Dijon.
Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 6 months
Correlation between the severity of spasticity at the wrist and the spinal excitability
Tools: Angle of catch (in degree) and the amplitude of the H-reflex (in Volt) Logistic regression Only in Dijon.
Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 6 months
Correlation between the severity of spasticity at the wrist and cortical excitability
Tools: Angle of catch (in degree) and EEG ratio (laterality coefficient) Logistic regression Only in Dijon.
Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 6 months
Correlation between the severity of spasticity at the wrist and cortical excitability
Tools: Angle of catch (in degree) and EEG ratio (ERD alpha and beta bands)) Logistic regression Only in Dijon.
Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 6 months
Correlation between the severity of spasticity at the wrist and the spinal excitability
Tools: Torque score (RMSE) and the amplitude of the H-reflex (in Volt) Logistic regression Only in Dijon.
Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 6 months
Correlation between the severity of spasticity at the wrist and cortical excitability
Tools: Torque score (RMSE) and EEG ratio (laterality coefficient) Logistic regression Only in Dijon
Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 6 months
Correlation between the severity of spasticity at the wrist and cortical excitability
Tools: Torque score (RMSE) and EEG ratio (ERD alpha and beta bands)) Logistic regression Only in Dijon
Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.