Our study aims to build on emerging evidence showing relationships between gut health, sleep and brain functions. To achieve this, our study aims to test the feasibility of using non-pharmacological interventions: a psychoeducation-based intervention (enhanced sleep education - ESE) and a dietary supplement (Saffron extract), to improve sleep in older adults with insomnia complaints. Our study also aims to test the feasibility of using wearable and commercially available EEG headband technology to measure objective sleep quality in the home, which will allow for a reliable and ecologically more valid sleep research.
One-third of the UK adult population presents with disordered sleep, and the prevalence further increases with ageing. Disordered sleep has also been identified as a risk factor for dementia, which is alarming given that cases of dementia are predicted to triple across the world by 2050. Our study aims to build on emerging evidence showing relationships between gut health, sleep, and brain functions. To achieve this, our study aims to test the feasibility of using non-pharmacological interventions: a psychoeducation-based intervention (enhanced sleep education - ESE) and a dietary supplement (Saffron extract), to improve sleep in older adults with insomnia. The study aims to test the feasibility of using wearable sleep tracking EEG technology (DREEM3 device) to measure sleep quality in the home environment, which could contribute to a reliable but naturalistic and accessible future sleep research. The study is split into 4 phases: Screening phase: Participants will be asked to complete an online screening assessment to check for eligibility. Baseline assessment phase (1 week): Participants will complete in-person testing in the Sleep and Brain Research Unit (SBRU) located at the University of East Anglia, to assess their cognitive functions, psychological well-being, and postural control. They will be asked to provide a faecal sample to profile the baseline gut microbiota, a urine sample to gain a baseline measure for testing supplement adherence and wear the DREEM3 headband device and complete a sleep diary to track their sleep quality with a high accuracy in their habitual home environment. Intervention phase (4 weeks): Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups following a factorial design: Group 1: Food supplement \& ESE; Group 2: Food supplement \& No ESE (control); Group 3: Placebo (control) \& ESE, and Group 4: Placebo (control) \& No ESE (control). These groups will allow us to test the effectiveness of each non-pharmacological intervention for feasibility. Follow-up assessment (1 week - overlap with the last week of intervention): Participants will be asked to measure their sleep at home using the DREEM3 EEG device and complete a sleep diary, and finally will be re-tested for cognitive performance, psychological wellbeing, and postural control. A follow-up faecal sample and urine sample will be collected as well. This research predicts that it is feasible for sleep difficulties in older adults to be objectively assessed in the home environment and non-pharmacologically treated using food supplements and behavioural techniques. It endeavours to provide pilot evidence for the effectiveness of future individualized non-pharmaceutical sleep treatments in older people at risk of dementia.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
48
Ingestion of one gummy sweet of Saffr'Inside; 30mg, on a daily basis for 4 weeks.
Psycho-education based multi-component sleep intervention
Placebo food supplement identical to the active gummy sweet of Saffr'Inside; 30mg, on a daily basis for 4 weeks.
Number of nights on which participants used the Dreem headband over a 14 day period
Frequency of Dreem headband usage over a 14 day period will be used to measure device adherence rates. Higher adherence rates will indicate higher levels of acceptability of the device as a method of measuring electrical activity (electroencephalogram) within the home environment
Time frame: 2 weeks
Mean percentage of Dreem device signal quality over a 14 day period
Signal quality will range from 0-100%, with percentages \>80% indicating good signal quality. Higher signal quality will indicate higher levels of feasibility of the device as a method of measuring objective sleep quality based on electrical activity of the brain (electroencephalogram) within the home environment.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Number of Participants who report that they made changes to their sleeping habits following engagement in Enhanced Sleep Education (ESE).
Frequency of participants who make self-reported changed to their sleeping habits will be used to measure adherence rates to the Enhanced Sleep Education (ESE) intervention. Higher adherence to the intervention will indicate higher acceptability of this method for treating sleep complaints.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Changes in scores on the self-reported sleep quality measure using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo.
Changes in scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo will be used to measure feasibility of using proposed treatment conditions to treat sleep difficulties. Treatment conditions include: Enhanced Sleep Education (ESE) intervention X Dietary Supplement (Saffr'Inside), ESE X Placebo, No ESE (control) X Dietary Supplement (Saffr'Inside), No ESE (control) X Placebo. A decrease in scores on the PSQI would indicate improved sleep and suggest feasibility of using the described treatment conditions to improve subjective sleep complaints. (Highest score = 21, Lowest score = 0)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Changes in scores on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo.
Changes in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo will be used to measure feasibility of using proposed treatment conditions to treat sleep difficulties. Treatment conditions include: Enhanced Sleep Education (ESE) intervention X Dietary Supplement (Saffr'Inside), ESE X Placebo, No ESE (control) X Dietary Supplement (Saffr'Inside), No ESE (control) X Placebo. A decrease in scores on the ISI would indicate improved sleep and suggest feasibility of using the proposed treatment conditions to improve subjective sleep complaints. (Highest score = 28, Lowest score= 0)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Changes in objective sleep quality as measured by the sleep efficiency index based on the Dreem electroencephalogram headband pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo.
Sleep efficiency index will be measured using percentage (sleep efficiency = total sleep time / time in bed x 100). Changes in sleep efficiency index of sleep will be used to measure the feasibility of the proposed treatment conditions on improving objective sleep quality. Higher percentages of sleep efficiency suggest improved sleep.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Changes in the time spent awake following initial sleep onset (in minutes) as measured by the Dreem electroencephalogram headband pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo.
Changes in the time spent awake following initial sleep onset (in minutes) will be used to measure objective sleep quality. Decreases in time spent awake following initial sleep onset (in minutes) will suggest feasibility of proposed treatment conditions for improving objective sleep quality.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Mean number of days on which participants ingested the dietary supplements (Saffr'Inside) per subject over a 4 week period
Frequency (mean number of days per subject) of ingestion of the dietary supplement will be used to measure the adherence rate of the supplement. Higher adherence rates will indicate higher levels of acceptability of using a supplement to improve sleep complaints.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Changes in scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo.
Changes in scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo will be used to measure the feasibility of proposed treatment conditions to improve Psychological wellbeing. A decrease in scores indicates a decrease in experiences of low mood and improved psychological wellbeing. (highest score = 27, lowest score = 0)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Changes in the time to complete (in seconds) on the Trail Making Task B pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo.
Changes in completion time (in seconds) on the Trail Making Task B pre/post treatment conditions compared to a placebo will be used measure changes in participants cognitive functioning. Decreases in completion time would suggest improve cognitive functioning.
Time frame: 4 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.