To assess minimal clinically important change, cut-offs for treatment failure and patient acceptable symptom state for pain and patient-reported function and quality of life in persons with hip or knee osteoarthritis, participating in digitally delivered first-line education and exercise treatment.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are consistently recommended as the primary end-point in clinical trials evaluating treatment effects in different medical conditions. For a meaningful interpretation of the PROMs used, three different approaches have been proposed; The Minimal Important Change (MIC), which is the smallest change in scores that represents an important improvement for the patient, i.e., the patient is feeling better, the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), which represents patients that consider their current status as acceptable, i.e., the patient is feeling good and Treatment Failure (TF), which represents patients that consider their state so unsatisfactory that they think the treatment has failed, all based on relevant anchor questions. Previous research in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and femoroacetabular impingement reveals that feeling better is not necessarily the same as feeling good and reporting only the MIC (or mean change) may overestimate the results, stressing the need for including different measures of improvement to evaluate treatment effects on PROMs. The MIC, PASS and TF for persons undergoing digital treatment for hip or knee osteoarthritis are not yet determined. In this retrospective register-based study we will define MIC, PASS and TF in pain and patient-reported function and quality of life, using anchor-based questions, for persons participating in digital first-line treatment for hip and knee OA. In addition, we will use these thresholds to establish the proportion of patients reaching MIC and/or PASS or reporting TF, separate for persons with hip and knee OA. Statistical analysis: For MIC calculations, participants will be categorized as "importantly improved" if they answered "Better an important improvement" or "Somewhat better but enough to be an important improvement" to the anchor questions for KOOS/HOOS and NRS. MIC for an important improvement will then be calculated using the predictive modeling method (MICpred), adjusting for the proportion of improved patients. The MICpred method will also be used to calculate the post score (i.e., 3, 6, 9 and 12 months) for KOOS/HOOS-scores and NRS-scores for participants that have responded "Yes" to the PASS or TF anchor question, respectively. The proportion of participants reaching the cut-offs of MIC, PASS and TF for the KOOS/HOOS and NRS, will then be calculated separately for participants with knee and hip OA. Subgroup analyses on the effect of sex, age and baseline symptoms (depending on data distribution to ensure we will have an adequated sample size also in subgroups) on MIC, PASS and TF will also be performed using the MICpred method
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
11,708
The program is an app-based version of the Swedish face-to-face management program for OA "Better management of patients with OsteoArthrits" and includes weekly educational sessions, individualized exercises and a possibility to chat asynchronously with a physical therapist during the entire duration of the program.
Arthro Therapeutics
Malmo, Sweden
Joint pain
Joint pain will be measured with the NRS-scale. NRS comprises an 11-point scale where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain during the last week
Time frame: 3 - 12 months
KOOS/HOOS-12
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12)(knee OA) and the Hip injury and Outcome Score (HOOS)(hip OA) will be used for evaluating knee/hip function and quality of life. The KOOS/HOOS-12 are short versions of the original KOOS/HOOS questionnaires and includes 12 items measuring knee/hip pain, physical function and knee/hip-related quality of life. All items are scored from 0-4. The scores will then be normalized to a score from 0-100 for each domain (pain, function and quality of life) as well as a total score of all three domains where 0 indicates extreme problems and 100 indicates no problems.
Time frame: 3-12 months
MIC
The MIC associated with KOOS/HOOS-12/NRS scores will be calculated using domain specific anchor questions; NRS and KOOS/HOOS pain: How is your joint pain now compared with prior to your participation in the treatment? KOOS/HOOS function: How is your ability to perform daily activities now, compared with prior to your participation in the treatment? (sitting, standing, walking, stairs, putting on/taking off socks, household work)? KOOS/HOOS QoL: How is your quality of life in relation to your knee now, compared with prior to your participation in the treatment? (trust in knee, lifestyle, how often you think of your knee)? With the following response option; Better, an important improvement/ Somewhat better but enough to be an important improvement/ Very small change, not enough to be an important improvement/About the same/Very small change, not enough to be an important deterioration/Somewhat worse, but enough to be an important deterioration/Worse, an important deterioration
Time frame: 3 - 12 months
Patient acceptable symtom state (PASS)
The following question will be asked (yes/no); Considering your knee/hip function, do you feel that your current state is satisfactory? You should take all activities during your daily life, sport and recreational activities, your level of pain and other symptoms, and also your knee/hip- related quality of life into account.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 3 - 12 months
Treatment failed (TF)
The following question will be asked (yes/no): If you answered "No" to the previous question, would you consider your current function as being so unsatisfactory that you think the treatment has failed?
Time frame: 3 - 12 months