To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Grency venous stent system in the treatment of iliac vein stenosis or occlusion.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new dedicated venous stent system (Grency) in the treatment of iliac vein stenosis or occlusion. The Grency stent system has a hybrid oblique self-expanding design, which allows precise positioning at the iliocaval confluence.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
112
Venous stent implantation during the index procedure
Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital
Beijing, China
Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University
Shanghai, China
Patency rate of venous stent
Freedom from target vessel revascularization ; freedom from in-stent stenosis more than 50% by venography.
Time frame: 12 months post-intervention
The rate of procedural technical success
Procedure technical success is defined as successful deployment of stent(s) to intended target without stent fracture or migration, as assessed by the investigator during the procedure.
Time frame: During procedure
Change in the clinical symptoms
Change from baseline in the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification at 3 months,6 months, and 12 months. VCSS measures 10 clinical attributes of venous disease (Pain, Varicose Veins,Venous Edema, Skin Pigmentation, Inflammation, Induration, No. Active Ulcers, Active Ulcer Size, Ulcer Duration and Compression Therapy) on a scale of 0 - 3 (Absent 0, Mild 1, Moderate 2, and Severe 3). Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification is a system that describes a doctor's physical exam findings for vein problem(s), the cause of the problem(s), the location in the leg, and the mechanism responsible for the manifestation of the vein problem. For Clinicalclassification, the clinical components indicates disease severity, ranging from none (0 points) to active ulcers (6 points).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months,6 months, and12 months post-intervention
The rate of device related major adverse events(MAE)
Time frame: 3,6,12 months post-intervention
The rate of adverse events (AE)
Time frame: 3,6,12 months post-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.