This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S device system versus intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting.
This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, assessor-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled isoflurane delivered via the Sedaconda ACD-S compared to intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated Intensive Care Unit (ICU) adult patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
235
Inhaled isoflurane administered by Sedaconda ACD-S
Intravenous infusion of propofol
Memorial Health Services
Long Beach, California, United States
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Percentage of time adequate sedation depth
To compare the percentage of time sedation depth is maintained within the target range, in absence of rescue sedation, as assessed according to the RASS scale, in isoflurane- vs propofol-treated patients
Time frame: During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours
Key Secondary: Compare the use of opioids
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on use of opioids during the study drug treatment period measuring CPOT
Time frame: During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours
Key Secondary: Compare the wake up time
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on the wake up time at end of study drug treatment
Time frame: Time from stop of study drug treatment up to 4 hours
Key Secondary: Compare the cognitive recovery after EOT
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on cognitive recovery after EOT by measuring CAM-ICU-7
Time frame: 60 minutes after EOT
Key Secondary: Compare the spontaneous breathing effort
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on spontaneous breathing effort during the study drug treatment period by measuring • Airway occlusion pressure, pressure support or if observed respiratory rate exceeds set respiratory rate
Time frame: During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours
Other secondary: Compare time from sedation termination to extubation
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on time from sedation termination to extubation in patients for whom study drug is terminated for extubation
Time frame: During study treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Stanford University
Redwood City, California, United States
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
University of Miami
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, United States
...and 6 more locations
Other secondary: Compare days alive and free of mechanical ventilation through Study Day 30
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on days alive and free of mechanical ventilation through Study Day 30
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days
Other secondary: Compare days alive and free of the ICU
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on days alive and free of the ICU
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days
Other secondary: Compare delirium and coma free days until 7 days after EOT
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on delirium and coma free days until 7 days after EOT
Time frame: From start of study treatment until 7 days after EOT
Other secondary: Compare mortality at 30 days after randomization
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on mortality at 30 days after randomization
Time frame: Until 30 days after randomization
Other secondary: Compare mortality at 3 months after randomization
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on mortality at 3 months after randomization
Time frame: Until 3 months after randomization
Other secondary: Compare mortality at 6 months after randomization
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on mortality at 6 months after randomization
Time frame: Until 6 months after randomization
Other secondary: To compare the safety profile of isoflurane vs propofol
To compare the safety profile of isoflurane vs propofol in respect to reported Adverse Event
Time frame: Baseline to end of study treatment, safety lab from baseline up to 48hrs post treatment, AEs from start study treatment up to day 30
Other secondary: To assess Sedaconda ACD-S device deficiencies in patients receiving isoflurane
To assess Sedaconda ACD-S device deficiencies in patients receiving isoflurane by Sedaconda ACD-S by reported Adverse Event
Time frame: During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours
Other secondary: To compare the use of restraints in patients receiving isoflurane vs propofol
Incidence of restraints measured twice daily
Time frame: During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours