To compare the safety and efficacy of concomitant LFMT versus placebo in UC patients who are starting vedolizumab or ustekinumab.
This is dual-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial for UC patients with active disease who are being initiated on treatment with vedolizumab or ustekinumab. The study will recruit 40 outpatients at 2 Canadian healthcare centres at the University of Alberta Hospital (University of Alberta), and the University of Manitoba.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
40
vedolizumab or ustekinumab + FMT vs placebo
Placebo
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
RECRUITINGProportion of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs) of interest up to week 8 in each group (ie vedolizumab with or without LFMT, ustekinumab with or without LFMT).
SAE of interest is defined as one of the following: * An infection attributable to FMT * Worsening UC, defined as requiring rescue therapy such as increase in steroid dose or change in biologic or colectomy * Hospitalization due to UC or an infection attributable to FMT * Mortality due to UC or an infection attributable to FMT SAE of interest is defined as one of the following: * An infection attributable to FMT * Worsening UC, defined as requiring rescue therapy such as increase in steroid dose or change in biologic or colectomy * Hospitalization due to UC or an infection attributable to FMT * Mortality due to UC or an infection attributable to FMT
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of participants in each group with adverse events during the study up to week 24, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, worsening diarrhea, constipation or fevers
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of participants who achieve clinical remission, defined as total Mayo score ≤ 2 with no individual subscore > 1, at week 8 and 24 in each group.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of participants who achieve clinical response
Defined as a reduction in the Mayo clinic score of ≥ 3 points and/ or ≥ 30% from baseline, with a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or a subscore ≤ 1 at week 8 and 24 in each group
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of participants who achieve symptom remission, defined as partial Mayo score < 2 with no individual subscore > 1, at week 8 and 24 in each group
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of participants who achieve symptom response, defined as reduction in partial Mayo score ≥ 2 points from baseline and ≥ 30% from baseline and decrease in rectal bleeding score of ≥ 1point from baseline, at week 8 and 24 in each group
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of participants who achieve endoscopic improvement, defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1, at week 8 and 24 in each group
Time frame: 24 weeks
Changes in partial Mayo score over time up to week 24 relative to baseline in each group
Time frame: 24 weeks
Changes in quality of life, assessed by short IBD Questionnaire (sIBDQ), and work productivity, assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAIQ), at week 8 and 24 relative to baseline in each group
Time frame: 24 weeks
Changes in inflammatory markers (serum c-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin) over time up to week 24 in each group
Time frame: 24 weeks