Evaluation of Implant Stability in Low Quality Bone Following the Use of Osseodensifiers Versus Ridge Expanders

N/ACompletedNCT05330546

Cairo University20 enrolled

Overview

the use of osseodensification technique compared to ridge expansion screws in low bone quality

using Densah burs in preparation of implant osteotomy compared to ridge expansion screws in low quality bone

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Low Bone Density

Interventions

Densah bursPROCEDURE

using Densah burs to prepare implant osteotomy

Ridge expansion screwsPROCEDURE

using Ridge expansion screws to prepare implant osteotomy

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 20 YearsMax age: 60 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * • Single tooth missing in the maxillary region with D3 (350-850 HU) and D4 (150-350 HU) bone (Sultana et al., 2020). * A minimum of 4 mm residual buccolingual bone width at site of implant placement (Koutouzis et al., 2019). * The recipient site of the implant should be free from any pathological conditions. * No diagnosed bone disease or medication known to affect bone metabolism. * Patients who are cooperative, motivated and hygiene conscious. * Patients having adequate inter-occlusal space of 8-10 mm (Fernández et al., 2017) Exclusion Criteria: * Systemic conditions/diseases that contraindicate surgery (Jarikian et al., 2021). * Patients who have any habits that might jeopardize the osseointegration process, such as current smokers (Vollmer et al., 2020). * Patients with parafunctional habits that produce overload on implant, such as bruxism and clenching (Sultana et al., 2020). * Alcohol or drug abuse (Ibrahim et al., 2020). * Pregnant and lactating women.

Locations (1)

Cairo University

Cairo, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Implant stability

assessing the stability using Osstell

Time frame: change from baseline at 3 month

Implant stability

assessing the stability using Osstell

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 month

Secondary Outcomes

Radiographic bone density

using CBCT in mm

Time frame: change from baseline at 3 month

Radiographic bone density

using CBCT in mm

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 month

Change in crestal bone level

using CBCT in mm

Time frame: change from baseline at 3 month

Change in crestal bone level

using CBCT in mm

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 month

Change in buccolingual bone width

using CBCT in mm

Time frame: change from baseline at 3 month

Change in buccolingual bone width

using CBCT in mm

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 month

Patient reported outcomes

10 mm Visual analogue scale from 1 to 10 with 1 minimal pain and 10 worst pain experience

Time frame: at time of surgery

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.