Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in Hong Kong and the seventh leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. In 2020, approximately 496000 new cases of pancreatic cancers were diagnosed globally . Pancreatic cancer is a highly fatal cancer with a case-fatality rate of 94.0% globally. In Hong Kong, both the incidence and mortality of pancreatic cancer have increased over the past decade. Due to the deep-seated location of pancreas, it is difficult to diagnose pancreatic cancer at an early stage, which in turn leads to delays in cancer treatment and poorer survival. Despite advances in oncologic treatment, the 5-year survival rate of metastatic pancreatic cancer remains poor (\~2.9%). As such, there has been growing interest to improve pancreatic cancer prevention and survival by: 1. reduction of modifiable risk factors (eg, cigarette smoking, obesity, diabetes), 2. screening for early detection of high-risk pre-malignant lesions in selected high-risks patients with strong family history of pancreatic cancer and/or certain germline mutations of pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes (eg, BRCA1, BRAC2, DNA mismatch repair genes in Lynch Syndrome, etc) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and 3. surveillance of pre-malignant precursor lesions such as mucinous pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) by imaging and/or EUS to identify high-risk neoplastic progression indicated for surgical resection.
Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in Hong Kong and the seventh leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. In 2020, approximately 496000 new cases of pancreatic cancers were diagnosed globally . Pancreatic cancer is a highly fatal cancer with a case-fatality rate of 94.0% globally. In Hong Kong, both the incidence and mortality of pancreatic cancer have increased over the past decade. Due to the deep-seated location of pancreas, it is difficult to diagnose pancreatic cancer at an early stage, which in turn leads to delays in cancer treatment and poorer survival. Despite advances in oncologic treatment, the 5-year survival rate of metastatic pancreatic cancer remains poor (\~2.9%). As such, there has been growing interest to improve pancreatic cancer prevention and survival by: 1. reduction of modifiable risk factors (eg, cigarette smoking, obesity, diabetes), 2. screening for early detection of high-risk pre-malignant lesions in selected high-risks patients with strong family history of pancreatic cancer and/or certain germline mutations of pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes (eg, BRCA1, BRAC2, DNA mismatch repair genes in Lynch Syndrome, etc) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and 3. surveillance of pre-malignant precursor lesions such as mucinous pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) by imaging and/or EUS to identify high-risk neoplastic progression indicated for surgical resection The prevalence of incidentally found pancreatic cystic lesions ranges from 2.1% to 13.5% in patients undergoing CT or MRI for non-pancreatic indications. In patients with pre-malignant mucinous PCN (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN)), pancreatic cancer can originate from the pre-malignant PCN, or develop in other parts of the pancreas uninvolved by the original PCN due to "field-defect". While the malignant potentials of different PCNs vary, the frequency of invasive carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in IPMN remains substantial, ranging from 36-100% in the main duct type (MD-IPMN) and from 14-48% in the branch duct type (BD-IPMN). Multiple consensus guidelines and society guidelines have been developed based on cyst structural characteristics and cyst related symptoms to guide management between surgical resection or surveillance of pre-malignant PCN. The 2017 revised international consensus guidelines (Fukuoka guidelines) recommend surgical resection for all MD-IPMN and BD-IPMN with high-risk stigmata of malignancy or worrisome features confirmed by EUS (definite mural nodule \> 5mm, main pancreatic duct involvement (dilation / abrupt change in calibre), cytology suspicious or positive for malignancy on EUS guided fine needle aspiration). On the other hand, surveillance of asymptomatic BD-IPMN without high-risk stigmata or worrisome features would be performed with cross-sectional imaging and/or EUS periodically, with intervals tailored to the size of the BD-IPMN. Although the consensus guidelines and society guidelines have been widely applied in clinical practice, considerable variations in their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values in predicting advanced neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer) in pre-malignant PCN were reported in validation studies. As such, false-positive (recommending patients with low-risk PCN for a major surgery with considerable risks of morbidity/ mortality) or false-negative (missing a high-risk PCN with indication for surgery to prevent cancer development) prediction of malignant progression of mucinous PCN can still occur with significant clinical ramification. In addition, while cyst structural characteristics are traditional risk factors for neoplastic progression of PCN, these are not easily modifiable unless invasive procedures such as surgical resection or cyst ablation is performed. Therefore, it is of clinical importance to identify novel risk factors in pancreas that are potentially modifiable and may improve the current risk stratification algorithm for detection of high-risk lesions. Pancreatic steatosis is an increasingly recognized important metabolic condition with a prevalence of 16% to 35% in Asian populations. Recent retrospective studies have suggested an increased risk of pancreatic cancer, IPMN and progression of BD-IPMN in patients with pancreatic steatosis. However, despite its potential role as a modifiable risk factor for pancreatic cancer and progression of pre-malignant PCN such as IPMN, the actual prevalence of pancreatic steatosis in patients with PCN is not known. While ultrasound, CT and MRI have been used for fat quantitation in organs, MRI is best suited for this purpose since its signal is dependent on fat content. In contrast to fat content assessment by ultrasound in which interobserver variability may undermine its reliability, the fat fraction measurements by MRI are reproducible and accurate, and have been validated against histology in animal models. In addition, MRI also has an advantage over CT since there is no risk of radiation exposure. Previous work by our group has defined the normal range of fat content in pancreas (1.8% -10.4%) in the healthy Hong Kong population using MRI for fat quantification. The prevalence of fatty pancreas in healthy volunteers was found to be 16.1% when a pancreatic fat upper limit of normal of 10.4% was adopted. Our group has also shown that patients with fatty liver do not always have fatty pancreas. Among the 195 patients with fatty liver in our prior study, 82/195 (42.1%) had both fatty liver and fatty pancreas and 113/195 (57.9%) had fatty liver alone. Such observation suggested that pancreatic steatosis is likely a separate metabolic condition that deserves further investigation for its potential impact on important pancreatic pathologies such as pre-malignant PCN (eg, IPMN) and pancreatic cancer. Because little is known about the prevalence of pancreatic steatosis in patients with PCN, we would like to propose a prospective, matched case-control study to determine the prevalence of pancreatic steatosis using MRI in patients with presumed IPMN or MCN and compare with that of age and sex matched healthy subjects in the general population.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
236
MR imaging would be performed using a 3.0 T scanner (Achieva X series, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) with a 16-channel SENSE-XL-Torso array coil. 3D spoiled chemical-shift water-fat mDixon sequence (TR = 5.7 ms, first TE/echo spacing = 1.2-1.4 (ms)/1.0-1.2 (ms), number of echoes = 6, flip angle = 3°, SENSE acceleration = 2, a breath hold technique would be employed to acquire co-registered water, fat, fat-fraction and T2\* image series and would be reconstructed with slice thickness/number of slices = 3.0 mm/50. The field of view (FOV) covered the upper abdomen, i.e. region from the dome of the diaphragm to the iliac crest covering the entire extent of the liver and pancreas. Image reconstruction would be completed online using Philips mDixon product implementation with the multi-peak spectral model of fat to increase accuracy and sensitivity.
Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
RECRUITINGPrevalence of pancreatic steatosis determined by fat quantitation on MRI
Prevalence of pancreatic steatosis will be determined in patients with presumed IPMN or MCN and in age and sex matched healthy subjects in the general population.
Time frame: At the time of procedure
Prevalence of worrisome features or high-risk stigmata on baseline EUS in patients with presumed IPMN or MCN and pancreatic steatosis
worrisome features or high-risk stigmata are defined according to 2017 revised Fukuoka international consensus guidelines
Time frame: At the time of procedure
Prevalence of worrisome features or high-risk stigmata on baseline EUS in patients with presumed IPMN or MCN without pancreatic steatosis
worrisome features or high-risk stigmata are defined according to 2017 revised Fukuoka international consensus guidelines
Time frame: At the time of procedure
Prevalence of coexisting fatty liver and fatty pancreas, fatty liver alone, or fatty pancreas alone in patients with presumed IPMN or MCN
Diagnosis of fatty liver, fatty pancreas will be based on fat quantitation on MRI
Time frame: At the time of procedure
Risk factors for pancreatic steatosis in patients with presumed IPMN or MCN
Regression analysis will be used to help identify risk factors for pancreatic steatosis
Time frame: At the time of procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.