This clinical trial compares intensive symptom evaluation with supportive care to standard symptom management in patients with head and neck cancer that has not spread to other places in the body (non-metastatic). Standard symptom management involves symptom management during and after radiation therapy, using problem-focused history and physical examination followed by appropriate symptomatic management as appropriate per treating physician's discretion. Intensive symptom management with monitoring patient reported outcomes is performed among patients with metastatic cancers receiving systemic therapies and with various cancers receiving radiation therapy. This trial may help researchers determine the impact of intensive symptom surveillance in patients with non-metastatic head and neck cancers.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Using study questionnaires to determine the impact of intensive symptom evaluation with supportive care as needed per treating physician's discretion versus standard symptom management on time to first acute care visits at 3 months. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Using study questionnaires to determine the impact of intensive symptom evaluation with supportive care as needed per treating physician's discretion versus standard symptom management on (1) changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), financial burden, and caregiver burden from baseline, (2) time to first acute care visits at 1 or 6 month, (3) locoregional (LRF) and distant failure (DF), and (4) progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. II. Using study questionnaires to determine the impact of intensive symptom evaluation with supportive care as needed per treating physician's discretion versus standard symptom management when stratified. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups. GROUP A: Patients complete a quality of life questionnaires over 10-15 minutes twice weekly (BIW) during standard of care radiation therapy and once weekly (QW) for the first month after completing standard of care radiation therapy course, and then once monthly for 6 months. GROUP B: Patients receive standard symptom management QW during standard of care radiation therapy for 6 months after completing radiation therapy course.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
72
Receive standard symptom management
Complete quality of life questionnaire
Complete quality of life questionnaire
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
Time to first acute care visit
to evaluate the impact of intensive symptom evaluation compared to standard symptom management on time to first acute care visits at 3 months with time to first acute care visits.
Time frame: At 3 months
Change in Health-related quality of life EORTC QLQ-C30
Patient reported outcome assessment measured data Quality of life data will be obtained via European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Patients (EORTC QLQ-C30). It It is a 30-item questionnaire assessing other cancer-related symptoms
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in financial burden
Change in patient reported outcomes measured using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). Financial toxicity is assessed using an 11-item patient-reported measure of financial stress used in cancer patients. The COST yields a total score with higher scores indicating less financial toxicity
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in caregiver burden
Will be evaluated with the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA). Summary score range between 5 and 120. A higher score indicates a higher level of burden.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Time to first acute care visits
Patient reported 9 item questionnaire to evaluate the impact of intensive symptom evaluation compared to standard symptom management on time to first acute care visits at 3 months with time to first acute care visits.
Time frame: At 1 or 6 month
Locoregional failure
Analyzed with the questionnaire and standard of care tumor assessment, disease progression, and survival status information.
Time frame: Time interval from diagnosis to locoregional failure, assessed up to 6 months
Distant failure
Analyzed with the questionnaire and standard of care tumor assessment, disease progression, and survival status information.
Time frame: Time interval from diagnosis to distant failure outside head and neck region, assessed up to 6 months
Progression free survival
Analyzed with the questionnaire and standard of care tumor assessment, disease progression, and survival status information.
Time frame: Time interval from diagnosis to tumor recurrence or progression of disease, assessed up to 6 months
Overall survival
Analyzed with the questionnaire and standard of care tumor assessment, disease progression, and survival status information.
Time frame: Time interval from diagnosis to death from any cause, assessed up to 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.