An increase of intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important cause of secondary brain damage. The gold standard for measuring ICP is represented by invasive positioning of intracranial ICP devices. The most used non-invasive methods (nICP) are obtained through bed-side ultrasound, routinely used in the management of children in Pediatric Intensive Care: arterial Trancranial Doppler (TCD) and ultrasound measurement of the diameter of the optic nerve sheath (ONSD ). In this study it is proposed to compare the measurement of nICP obtained by TCD and ONSD versus the measurement obtained by the invasive monitoring (iICP) already present.
An iIncrease in intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important cause of secondary brain damage. The cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), defined as the mean arterial pressure value (MAP) minus the ICP value (CPP = MAP-ICP), represents the pressure gradient that is responsible for cerebral flow. The gold standard for measuring ICP is represented by invasive methods that are intra-parenchymal or intra-ventricular catheters positions by neurosurgeons. The placement of these catheters can cause complications, mainly bleeding and infections. The most used non-invasive (nICP) methods are obtained through a medical device such as bed-side ultrasound, routinely used in the management of children in Pediatric Intensive Care: arterial Trancranial Doppler (TCD) and ultrasound measurement of the diameter of the optic nerve sheath (ONSD ). Arterial TCD is one of the most studied methods in adults for the non-invasive estimation of ICP. Formulas derived from the measurement of cerebral flow velocities (VF) such as the Pulsatility Index (PI) and the formula based on the Diastolic Flow Rate (FVdICP) have been shown to have a correlation with the iICP. According to the literature, a PI\> 1 is associated with an ICP value\> 20 mmHg. Schmitd, Czosnyka et al. subsequently proposed a new formula for the non-invasive measurement of CPP and therefore of ICP (FVdICP), demonstrating the accuracy of CPP measured with the invasive technique The ONSD is a rapid and repeatable method for making a rapid diagnosis of increased ICP not only in adults but also in children, considering the diameter of the optic nerve sheath equal to 4.5 mm in children as the upper limit of the norm. 1 year of age and 4 mm in children under 1 year. In this study it is proposed to compare the measurement of nICP obtained with the TCD and with the ONSD versus the measurement obtained by the invasive monitoring (iICP) already present.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
46
TCD and ONSD sonography twice a day per 2 days
PICU IRCSS Sant'Orsola Malpighi
Bologna, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPICU Spedali Civili BRescia
Brescia, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPICU Ospedale Mayer
Florence, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPICU Ospedale Gaslini
Genova, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPICU University Hospital Padova
Padua, Italy
RECRUITINGPICU Università Cattolica
Roma, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGcomparison between ICP and nICP (measured by TCD)
For each patient with invasive ICP, the nICP (measured by TCD) will be compared. We will collect ICP and nICP in pairs for each measurement ( T1 ) using the same unit of measurement. (During 48 hours we will collect ICP and nICP in pairs 4 times: T1 T2 T3 T4. We will finally evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample).
Time frame: within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
comparison between ICP and nICP (measured by TCD)
For each patient with invasive ICP, the nICP (measured by TCD) will be compared. We will collect ICP and nICP in pairs for each measurement ( T2 ) using the same unit of measurement. (During 48 hours we will collect ICP and nICP in pairs 4 times: T1 T2 T3 T4. We will finally evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample).
Time frame: within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
comparison between ICP and nICP (measured by TCD)
For each patient with invasive ICP, the nICP (measured by TCD) will be compared. We will collect ICP and nICP in pairs for each measurement ( T3 ) using the same unit of measurement. (During 48 hours we will collect ICP and nICP in pairs 4 times: T1 T2 T3 T4. We will finally evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample).
Time frame: within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
comparison between ICP and nICP (measured by TCD)
For each patient with invasive ICP, the nICP (measured by TCD) will be compared. We will collect ICP and nICP in pairs for each measurement ( T4 ) using the same unit of measurement. (During 48 hours we will collect ICP and nICP in pairs 4 times: T1 T2 T3 T4. We will finally evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample).
Time frame: within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
comparison between ICP and nICP (measured by ONSD)
For each patient with invasive ICP, the nICP (measured by ONSD) will be compared twice a day for 2 days. We will collect ICP and nICP in pairs for each measurement (4 times: T1 T2 T3 T4) using the same unit of measurement and evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample.
Time frame: within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
interrater reliability for TCD measurement
For each patient with invasive ICP, two nICP measurement by TCD will be performed by two operators blinded each other. We will collect nICP values in pairs (by two operators) for each measurement (2 times) using the same unit of measurement and evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample.
Time frame: within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
interrater reliability for ONSD measurement
For each patient with invasive ICP, two nICP measurement by ONSD will be performed by two operators blinded each other. We will collect nICP values in pairs (by two operators) for each measurement (2 times) using the same unit of measurement and evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample.
Time frame: within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.