Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection(SISMAD) is an increasingly diagnosed disease. However, prospective, multicenter studies that can provide evidence to support clinical decisions are very limited. This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy of conservative and endovascular treatment for SISMAD.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
200
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China
RECRUITINGMortality
Mortality during follow-up period
Time frame: up to 5 years
Rate of symptom relief
Rate of symptom relief during follow-up period
Time frame: up to 5 years
Reintervention rate
Reintervention related to SISMAD after treatments during follow-up period
Time frame: Follow-up period( 5 years)
Recurrence rate
SISMAD Recurrence after treatments during follow-up period
Time frame: Follow-up period(5 years)
Disease-related complications
Disease-related complications after treatments during follow-up period
Time frame: Follow-up period(5 years)
Complete remodeling rate of superior mesenteric artery dissection
Complete remodeling rate of superior mesenteric artery dissection after receiving different treatments
Time frame: Follow-up period(5 years)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.