Comparing clinical and radiological results of patients after prosthetic surgery conventionally with no robotic assistance and ROSA® Knee prosthetic surgery robotic assistance.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
144
Robotic Assisted Knee Prosthetic Surgery using ROSA® (Zimmer-Biomet) System
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, Spain
RECRUITINGUtility of ROSA® (Zimmer-Biomet) Robotic assisting system for knee prosthetic surgery
Correct lower limb mechanical alignment
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
Mobility
Range of Motion in degrees
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Technique reproducibility between surgeons
Reproducing mechanical alignment in degrees
Time frame: Intraoperative
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction in a numeric scale from 1 to 10
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Time to Recovery
Time to feel patients themselves better than presurgery in months
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Time to home discharge
Hospital stay in days between surgery and discharging home
Time frame: 1 month
Pain Control
Pain measurement with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Technique Timing at Operating Room (OR)
Timing in minutes to measure reproducibility between surgeons
Time frame: Intraoperative
Implant Stability
Presence of varus / valgus instability
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Complications
Major /Minor Complications
Time frame: 1 year after surgery