In this clinical trial the investigational medicinal product MIC is to be examined for its efficacy and safety in patients with living kidney transplantation. For this purpose the patients participating in the clinical trial and their associated kidney donors are randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups during the screening procedure. For the production of the investigational medicinal product MIC for the patients in the MIC therapy group mononuclear cells of the peripheral blood are obtained from the donors in a leukapheresis procedure. In the subsequent treatment phase, the patients in the MIC therapy group receive MIC as a weight-adjusted single dose administered intravenously. As part of the 12-month follow-up phase the kidney transplant and the corresponding immunosuppressive therapy will take place seven days later. Patients in the control group will receive a conventional standard immunosuppressive regimen without prior administration of the investigational medicinal product MIC after kidney transplantation. All patients taking part in this clinical trial are followed up for one year after kidney transplantation with regard to the efficacy and safety of MIC in regular visits at their study site. As the investigational medicinal product is an advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) all subjects will be monitored for a further 2 years after the end of the follow-up phase of the clinical trial. A total of 63 transplant pairs, consisting of donor and transplant recipient, are to be included in the clinical trial. The 63 patients will be randomized 2:1 to be treated with MIC (MIC group) or without MIC (control group). Additionally, low immunosuppression or minimal immunosuppression treatments will be used in the patients in the MIC group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
126
Single intravenous infusion of 1.5x10exp8 MIC per kg of body weight
No application of the investigational medicinal product MIC
Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Universitäres Transplantations Centrum
Hamburg, Germany
RECRUITINGInnere Medizin V; Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Rheumatologie; Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany
RECRUITINGMedizinische Klinik, Innere Medizin X Nephrologie - Nierenzentrum Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany
RECRUITINGTransplantationszentrum München; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
Munich, Germany
RECRUITINGKlinikum rechts der Isar, Abteilung Nephrologie, Technische Universität München
Munich, Germany
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversitätsklinikum Münster, Transplantationsnephrologie
Münster, Germany
RECRUITINGKlinik für Nieren-, Hochdruck- und Autoimmunerkrankungen; Transplantationszentrum Stuttgart
Stuttgart, Germany
RECRUITINGNo acute rejection, graft loss, graft dysfunction
Proportion of patients who achieve an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared to standard of care therapy defined on Visit Day 367 as fulfilling four criteria that are evaluated: Criterium 1.: No acute rejection (biopsy-proven as \>Banff Borderline or clinically suspected rejection according to evaluation of adjudication committee), graft loss, graft dysfunction (eGFR \<30 mL/min), or death on Visit Day 367
Time frame: On day 367 post investigational medicinal product application
No development of de novo donor-specific HLA- antibodies
Proportion of patients who achieve an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared to standard of care therapy defined on Visit Day 367 as fulfilling four criteria that are evaluated: Criterium 2.: No development of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA ≤1,000 MFI; values \>1,000 MFI after Visit Day 6 has to be confirmed by second measurement after 4 weeks) until Visit Day 367 as measured by Luminex single antigen test
Time frame: Between day 0 and day 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Induction of regulatory B cells (Breg) to ≥3%
Proportion of patients who achieve an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared to standard of care therapy defined on Visit Day 367 as fulfilling four criteria that are evaluated: Criterium 3.: Induction of Breg ≥3% measured on Visit Day 367 (patient has to be infection-free at timepoint of measurement)
Time frame: On day 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Patient on tacrolimus therapy with ≤720 mg EC-MPS and no corticosteroids
Proportion of patients who achieve an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared to standard of care therapy defined on Visit Day 367 as fulfilling four criteria that are evaluated: Criterium 4.: Patient on tacrolimus therapy with ≤720 mg EC-MPS and no corticosteroids (as well as no other immunosuppressive drug) on Visit Day 277 and remaining on this therapy until Visit Day 367
Time frame: Between days 277 and 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Key secondary: Number of patient-relevant infections during the first year after transplantation
Safety evaluation of MIC treatment versus standard of care therapy is based on number of patient-relevant infections during the first year after transplantation. Patient-relevant infections are: Pneumonia, and/or complicated urinary tract infection, and/or sepsis from any cause, and/or opportunistic infection.
Time frame: On day 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Key secondary: Biopsy proven acute rejection, graft loss, graft dysfunction, or death
Safety evaluation of MIC treatment versus standard of care therapy is also based on proportion of patients with acute rejection (biopsy-proven as \>Banff Borderline or clinically suspected rejection according to evaluation of adjudication committee), graft loss, graft dysfunction, or death on Visit Day 367
Time frame: On day 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Number of Adverse Events (AEs) including serious AEs and AEs of special interest
Determine safety and efficacy of MIC treatment based on AE outcome
Time frame: From screening through study completion, 3 years estimated.
Frequency of local or systemic reactions as result of MIC application
Determine safety and efficacy of MIC treatment based on further parameters other than comparison to standard of care therapy
Time frame: From day 0 through study completion, 3 years estimated.
Monitoring of patient survival
Determine safety and efficacy of MIC treatment based on further parameters other than comparison to standard of care therapy: Monitoring for death of patient.
Time frame: On Visit Days 187 and 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Monitoring of graft kidney survival
Determine safety and efficacy of MIC treatment based on further parameters other than comparison to standard of care therapy: Monitoring for death of grafted kidney.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: On Visit days 187 and 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejections and time to first rejection (>Banff Borderline)
Assessment is done according to current version Banff criteria and confirmed by a blinded central pathologist
Time frame: On Visit Days 97 and 142 post investigational medicinal product application
Molecular scores in molecular microscope diagnostic system (MMDx)
Molecular biopsy analysis using MMDx will be done
Time frame: On Visit Day 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Percentage of patients who achieved tacrolimus and EC-MPS dual therapy or tacrolimus monotherapy
Percentage of patients who achieved tacrolimus and EC-MPS dual therapy in the MIC Arm A or Control Arm or tacrolimus monotherapy in the MIC Arm B
Time frame: On day 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Amount of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA)
DSA measurement (\>1,000 MFI; confirmed by second measurement after 4 weeks for assessments after Day 6) will be done by blinded Luminex single antigen test
Time frame: On Visit Days 6, 187 and 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Occurrence of delayed function of the kidney graft after transplantation
Defined as dialysis within the first week after transplantation, except for one dialysis for hyperkalemia
Time frame: On Visit Day 37 post investigational medicinal product application
Assessment of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) [CKD-EPI])
Measurement of eGFR according to chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI)
Time frame: From screening through study completion, 3 years estimated.
Assessment of the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (CMV-DNA ≥1,000 copies/mL)
CMV amount will be measured as CMV-DNA copies/mL
Time frame: From screening through study completion, 3 years estimated.
Assessment of the incidence of BK virus replication ≥10,000 copies/mL
BK virus amount will be measured as DNA copies/mL
Time frame: From screening through study completion, 3 years estimated.
Assessment of the incidence of BK virus associated nephropathy
Nephropathy will be assessed using biopsy material
Time frame: From screening through study completion, 3 years estimated.
Assessment of the incidence of hospital readmissions after transplant surgery
Assessment of the number of patients who had hospital readmissions after transplant surgery
Time frame: On days 5, 7, 37, 97, 142, 187, 277, 367, month 24, 36 post investigational medicinal product application
Assessment of days in hospital, on intensive care and hours on mechanical ventilation upon re-admission
Assessment of days in hospital, on intensive care and hours on mechanical ventilation (the treatment to help a person breathe when they find it difficult or are unable to breathe on their own) that patients needed upon hospital re-admission after transplant surgery
Time frame: On day -14 to -7 and 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Change in quality of life as assessed by questionnaire
The SF-36 questionnaire with 36 questions will be used to assess the change in quality of life between screening and first year after treatment
Time frame: Between day -14 to -7 and 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation
Assessment of incidence of diabetes mellitus after transplantation by measuring fasting plasma glucose (≥7.0 mmol/L / 126 mg/dL) with no calorie intake for at least 8 hours
Time frame: From day 0 through study completion, 3 years estimated.
Determination of therapeutic intensity score (TIS) based on blood pressure on Visit Day 367 compared to Baseline
Assessment of the TIS as a summary measure that accounts for the number and the relative doses of blood pressure medications for a patient by a blinded adjudication committee one year after treatment
Time frame: On day -14 to -7 and 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Breg percentage
Assessment of the percentage of regulatory B cells of the white blood cell population measured from blood samples by Fluorecscence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)
Time frame: On day 367 post investigational medicinal product application
Anti-donor T cell response to the donor
Anti-donor T cell response will be assessed from blood samples using the mixed lymphocyte reaction in vitro assay
Time frame: From day 0 through study completion, 3 years estimated.
Cumulative steroid dose during the first year after treatment
Assessment of the overall amount of steroids given to the patient as immunosuppressive treatment during the first year after transplantation
Time frame: On day 367 post investigational medicinal product application