Every movement humans make in everyday life is based on a continuous integration of sensory information. A good interaction between sensory processes and motor control, called sensorimotor integration, is necessary for the efficiency of movements. Sensorimotor integration in the context of posture and walking is based on proprioception. Proprioception is the conscious and unconscious perception of the spatial and mechanical state of the musculoskeletal system. Proprioceptive information transmitted through the neuromuscular spindles in particular is suggested to play a role in motor rehabilitation.
This is particularly important when considering populations with impaired proprioception resulting in impaired posture and gait control. This is particularly the case for older adults and children with cerebral palsy (CP). Nevertheless, drastic differences exist between the two populations in the nature of these alterations: stable (children with CP) vs. progressive (older adults); brain lesion/upper motor neuron (children with CP) vs. processing deficits and peripheral sensory degradation (older adults); growing (children with CP) vs. fully developed individuals (older adults). However, both populations can improve their postural control with postural exercise programmes. In humans, the proprioceptive system can also be stimulated non-invasively by mechanical vibrations applied to tendons or muscles (localised vibration; LV), or by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves (somatosensory electrical stimulation; SES). As a result, chronically applied SES can improve sensorimotor function in healthy adults and some clinical cohorts. Similarly, a 6-week weight-bearing and weight-shifting training programme combined with LV has been reported to provide improved benefits in postural control, again in stroke patients.The greater improvement in motor function when LV or SES is added to active muscles may reflect an adjuvant effect: the sensory signal from LV or SES stimulation is integrated with the sensory signals from the task being performed, thus acting as an associative conditioning of the proprioceptive system, and leading to improved sensorimotor integration. The present project aims to study the effectiveness of a short-term intervention combining postural exercises with LV, SES, or the combination of both. In particular, this study will focus on the effects of these interventions on proprioception, postural control and walking in children with CP and older adults.Confirmation of hypotheses will open up new avenues for rehabilitation therapies and preventive interventions, and may be extended to other purposes and clinical populations.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
51
Training sessions without any stimulation
Training sessions with localized vibration
Training sessions with somatosensory electrical stimulation
Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, France
Evaluation of body balance with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Variation of postural control
Time frame: Change from Week 8 to Week 16
Evaluation of body balance with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Variation of postural control
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
Evaluation of the displacement of the center of pressure with force platform in centimeter
Variation of postural control
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
Displacement of the centrer of pressure with application of localized vibration in centimeter
Proprioceptive contribution to postural control
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
Measure of the angular position error in degrees
Variation of the position direction
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
Coefficient of variation muscle force control in percent
Muscle force control measurement
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
Measure 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in meters
Walking ability evaluation
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
Measure Timed Up & Go Test (TUG) in seconds
Walking ability evaluation
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
Measure 10 meter walk test (10MWT) in seconds
Walking ability evaluation
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
Quantifying corticospinal excitability with motor evoked potentials in milliVolt
Underlying neural adaptations evaluation in older adults only
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
Quantifying spinal excitability with H-reflex in milliVolt
Underlying neural adaptations evaluation in older adults only
Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.