The primary objective of DILEMMA study is to assess whether the "heart failure optimal therapy alone (HFOT)" strategy is non inferior to the "HFOT+ICD" strategy in terms of overall survival 48 months after randomization, in patients ≥ 70 years with an ICD indication for primary prevention of SCD whether there is an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy or not.
Rationale Although not recognized by guidelines, there is no available data demonstrating the benefit of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention strategy of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) in elderly. Nevertheless, ICD are currently implanted in this population by extending the results obtained in randomized trials involving younger subjects to the elderly. Finally, if the absence of implantation in the elderly was not inferior to the implantation of such a device, the non-implantation would avoid the device-related complications and decrease the health costs. Main objective The primary objective of DILEMMA study is to assess whether the "heart failure optimal therapy alone (HFOT)" strategy is non inferior to the "HFOT+ICD" strategy in terms of overall survival 48 months after randomization, in patients ≥ 70 years with an ICD indication for primary prevention of SCD whether there is an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy or not. Design This is a 2-arm parallel non-inferiority, randomized, open label, multicenter trial. 730 patients will be included over 4 years. Follow up will last 4 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
730
This group will undergo an ICD implantation (type and manufacturer at the discretion of the local investigator) in addition to heart failure medical therapy optimization. Patients of the "HFOT+ICD" group will be scheduled for ICD implantation.
Patients of the "HFOT alone" group will not undergo ICD implantation (except if they develop sustained ventricular arrhythmias and fulfil for secondary prevention ICD implantation), and continue with medical therapy optimization only.
Centre Hospitalier d'Aix en provence
Aix-en-Provence, France
RECRUITINGCHU Amiens-Picardie-Site sud
Amiens, France
RECRUITINGHôpitalHenri Mondor
Créteil, France
RECRUITINGCHU Grenoble Alpes
La Tronche, France
RECRUITINGGroupement d'Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille
Lomme, France
RECRUITINGHôpital de La Timone
Marseille, France
RECRUITINGHôpital de Brabois
Nancy, France
RECRUITINGCHU de Nantes
Nantes, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Privé du Confluent
Nantes, France
RECRUITINGHôpital européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, France
RECRUITING...and 9 more locations
Overall survival
The primary endpoint will be the overall survival at 48 months after randomization to "HFOT alone" group or "HFOT+ICD" group. There is an annual follow-up with precise date of the fatal event and specific cause of death adjudicated by the blinded event committee.
Time frame: 48 months after randomization
Cardiovascular mortality
Rate of cardiovascular mortality assessed by a blinded endpoint committee.
Time frame: 48 months after randomization
Sudden cardiac death and death from ventricular arrhythmias
Rate of sudden cardiac death and rate of death from ventricular arrhythmias assessed by a blinded endpoint committee.
Time frame: 48 months after randomization
Unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes
Number of unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes
Time frame: 48 months after randomization
ICD related complications including inappropriate therapies
Number of ICD related therapies (antitachycardia pacing and shocks), hematoma, infection related to the device, lead dislodgement requiring intervention, pneumothorax and tamponade.
Time frame: 48 months after randomization
Global quality of life score with 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF36)
Global quality of life score with SF36 (Short form 36 health survey) : the norm data is 0-100, the health related quality of life is increased as the scores are increased.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months
Health-related quality of life score Euroqol EQ-5D questionnaire
Health-related quality of life measured by using the European Quality Of Life (EQ-5D) auto-questionnaire. The digits for the five dimensions are combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The visual analogue scale (VAS) records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical axis from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months
Patient's global self-assessment of heart failure-related quality of life score
The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure will be used to measure the subjects perception of how their heart failure affect their life. Norm data is 0-105 (21 items ; score 0-5), quality of life increases as scores decrease.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months
The Incremental cost-utility ratio. (ICUR)
The ICUR is calculated by dividing the difference between the average costs of both groups by the difference in mean QALYs gained in both groups. The QALYs will be constructed with the EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire and value sets.
Time frame: 48 months
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
The ICER will estimate the cost per additional survivor and is calculated by dividing the difference between the average costs of both groups by the difference in effectiveness (survival) between both groups.
Time frame: 48 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.