Summary of the problem: Diabetes has been described as the fastest growing health crisis of our time. It currently affects more than 4.5million people in the UK. The direct cost to the NHS is already over £1 billion per year. One of the commonest complications of diabetes are foot ulcers. Despite current best treatment, these ulcers can be very difficult to heal, often taking months to heal and some never do. Even after healing ulcers return in up to 60% of people. In England someone undergoes an amputation of part of their foot every 2 hours and every 4 hours someone loses their leg due to diabetic foot ulcers. People are rarely able to be as active as before. This seriously affects their work, finances and quality of life. Research into improved treatments are a national priority. These treatments need to be safe, effective, tolerable for patients and value for money. Preliminary research has identified shockwave therapy as a promising new treatment in which high-power soundwaves (similar to ultrasound) are delivered to the ulcer. This may make ulcers heal faster. However, the effectiveness of shockwave therapy and the optimum dose is unknown. The aim of the study: 1. To carry out a preliminary (pilot) trial comparing sham (not active) shockwaves, low number of shockwaves and high number of shockwaves on diabetic foot ulcer healing 2. To understand beliefs, concerns, ideas and experience of shockwave therapy amongst patients and clinicians 3. To investigate the cost effectiveness (value for money) of shockwave therapy Methods 1\. Pilot Trial: Ninety patients with DFU will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: 1. High dose shockwave treatment 2. Low dose shockwave treatment 3. "Sham" shockwave treatment Each treatment will be delivered in 3x30minute sessions in a 7-day period. Face-to-face follow up appointments will take place 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after treatment to measure ulcer healing and changes in quality-of-life. Interviews Interviews to explore patient opinion of shockwave therapy, experience in taking part in the trial, reasons patients do not want to take part and clinician attitudes to shockwave therapy
There is an urgent need for better treatments for diabetic foot ulcers. Despite current best treatment, diabetic foot ulcers can be very difficult to heal, often taking months to heal and some never do. Even after healing ulcers return in up to 60% of people. In England someone undergoes an amputation of part of their foot every 2 hours and every 4 hours someone loses their leg due to diabetic foot ulcers. People are rarely able to be as active as before. This seriously affects their work, finances and quality of life. This research is going to look at a new therapy called Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (high power soundwaves) is a non-invasive treatment that is delivered directly to the ulcer and may improve healing. However, the effectiveness of shockwave therapy and the optimum dose is unknown. We will investigate if shockwave therapy improves diabetic foot ulcer healing. To do this we will undertake a randomised controlled trial. The trial will randomly allocate people (who are eligible to take part and consent) into one of three groups: sham shockwave therapy, low dose shockwave therapy and high dose shockwave therapy. The patient will not know which group they are in. The researcher collecting wound data will not know which group the patient is in. This is to ensure we and the patient do not influence the results of the study. This is a rigorous way of comparing new treatments to existing ones. The purpose of the pilot trial is to provide information to be able to repeat this trial again with a larger number of people. This pilot trial will help identify any problems and address any issues before the main trial starts. This minimises the risk of wasting money and people's time. The aim of this study is to: * Carry out a preliminary (pilot) trial comparing sham (not active) shockwave therapy, low number of shockwaves and high number of shockwaves on diabetes foot ulcers * To understand beliefs, concerns, ideas and experience of shockwave therapy amongst patients and clinicians The research has been co-designed by patients and their families with experience of diabetic foot ulcers. Pilot Trial: The aim of the pilot trial is to see whether we can recruit enough patients to the study, how many patients remain in the study and reasons why patients leave the trial. It will also test whether we are collecting the information (data) in the right way to answer the research question. This is to make sure that the main trial is successful. Ninety patients who have a diabetic foot ulcer will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups: * High dose shockwave therapy * Low dose shockwave therapy * 'Sham' shockwave therapy Each treatment will be delivered in a 3x30minute sessions over a 7 day period. All patients will receive usual ulcer care. Face to face follow up appointments will be at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after study entry to measure ulcer healing, changes in quality of life and health resource use. Interviews: Patients who are eligible to take part in the trial will be invited to an interview, to explore their reasons for (or for not) taking part, experience undergoing shockwave therapy and thoughts about being in the trial. This is to identify aspects of the trial which patients considered positive/negative so improvements can be made to the main trial. It will also help to improve the main trial and ensure our research is inclusive. Informal interviews, lasting around 30minutes, will be undertaken to explore patient opinion of shockwave therapy, experience of taking part in the trial, reasons patients do not want to take part and clinician attitudes to shockwave therapy. 24 patients and 8 clinicians will be invited to take part.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
77
ESWT will be given at 0.1mJ/mm2, 5 pulses/second and penetration of 5mm. Each intervention will be delivered in 3x30minute sessions over 7 days.
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Hull, United Kingdom
Eligibility ratio and recruitment ratio
Number eligible patients/number patients screened / recruited
Time frame: 19 months
Adherence to treatment
Number participants who completed the treatment protocol/number participants in the trial.
Time frame: 19 months
Percentage of missing data at each follow up point
Number of missing data points over number of data points x100
Time frame: 24 weeks
Follow up rates
No. of participants who attended each follow-up appointments / no. of follow-up appointments .
Time frame: 6 weeks
Follow up rates
No. of participants who attended each follow-up appointments / no. of follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Follow up rates
No. of participants who attended each follow-up appointments / no. of follow-up
Time frame: 24 weeks
Patient and clinician acceptability of the trial process and ESWT
Semi-structured in depth interviews
Time frame: 24 weeks
Time to DFU healing
Time taken for ulcer to heal
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of DFUs healed at 6 months
The number of ulcers healed / total no. of ulcers healed in the trial
Time frame: 24 weeks
Reduction in ulcer size at each study visit
% reduction in ulcer size
Time frame: 24 weeks
Quality of life questionnaires
EQ-5L
Time frame: 24 weeks
Quality of life questionnaires
DFUS
Time frame: 24 weeks
Quality of life questionnaires
WoundQol
Time frame: 24 weeks
Adverse events
Instance of amputation, infection, mortality, side effects, re-hospitalisation
Time frame: 24 weeks
Cost differences between ESWT and standard care alone
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio
Time frame: 24 weeks
Validity, reliability and responsiveness of WoundQol in patients with a DFU
To test WoundQol-14 reliability of the questionnaire in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer, participants will be asked to complete the questionnaire 3 days before the next follow-up appointment. The WoundQol-14 questionnaire will be repeated at the follow-up appointment. We will also test the validity of using WoundQol-14 over the telephone in patients who struggle to read (for example, due to diabetic retinopathy
Time frame: 24 weeks
Validity, reliability and responsiveness of virtual follow-up for wound healing in research
To test the feasibility, validity, reliability and responsiveness of virtual follow-up participants will be asked to send a photograph of their ulcer or ulcer site (if healed) 3 days before their follow up appointment to virtually assess the wound. Photographs are anticipated to be taken on the participant's smartphone by either themselves, a family member, friend or the community healthcare professional at dressing changes.
Time frame: 24 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.