The clinical investigation is a randomized, subject- and evaluator-blinded, active treatment controlled, multicenter, clinical investigation, to demonstrate the non inferiority of saypha® VOLUME Lidocaine to one of the devices approved for the same indication (Juvéderm® Voluma™ XC).
This will be a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, comparator-controlled study. The study took place in the US at 16 sites. The purpose of the current clinical investigation is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and long-term safety of saypha® VOLUME Lidocaine for the correction of age-related moderate to severe volume deficit in the midface (augmentation of midface volume deficit), and to demonstrate its non-inferiority to one of the devices approved for the same indication (Juvéderm® Voluma™ XC). In addition, the duration of the aesthetic effect after implantation will be studied. Approximately 486 subjects in total will be randomized and treated resulting in 437 evaluable subjects for the primary endpoint. Randomization will be in a 2:1 ratio (test device: 324, comparator device: 162). Each subject will take part in the investigation for up to 92 weeks. The total anticipated duration of the investigation, from the first-subject-first visit to the last-subject-last-visit, is around 114 weeks, based on expected recruitment period of about 22 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
562
Crosslinked hyaluronic acid (HA) 23 mg/mL + 0.3% lidocaine hydrochloride.
Crosslinked HA 20 mg/mL + 0.3% lidocaine hydrochloride
Clear Dermatology & Aesthetics Center
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills
Encino, California, United States
The Percentage of Responders on the 5-point Mid-Face Volume Deficit Severity Scale (MVDSS) at Week 24 - Per Protocol Dataset
The percentage of responders on the 5-point MVDSS (Mid-Face Volume Deficit Severity Scale where 0 means no deficit and 4 means Extreme Deficit) based on the blinded evaluator´s live assessment at Week 24 after last injection of initial treatment phase compared to the pre-treatment score at Baseline visit. Subjects are defined as responders if they are showing an \>=1 point improvement in MVDSS at Week 24 relative to baseline.
Time frame: Week 24
The Percentage of Responders on the 5-point Mid-Face Volume Deficit Severity Scale (MVDSS) at Week 24 - Full Analysis Dataset
The percentage of responders on the 5-point MVDSS (Mid-Face Volume Deficit Severity Scale where 0 means no deficit and 4 means Extreme Deficit) based on the blinded evaluator´s live assessment at Week 24 after last injection of initial treatment phase compared to the pre-treatment score at Baseline visit. Subjects are defined as responders if they are showing an \>=1 point improvement in MVDSS at Week 24 relative to baseline. Subjects with missing baseline MVDSS score and / or missing MVDSS score at Week 24 after last injection of the initial treatment phase were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 24
The Percentage of Responders on the 5-point Mid-Face Volume Deficit Severity Scale (MVDSS) at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 36, and 48 as Rated by the Blinded Evaluator
The percentage of responders on the 5-point MVDSS (Mid-Face Volume Deficit Severity Scale where 0 means no deficit and 4 means Extreme Deficit), based on the blinded evaluator´s live assessment at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 36, and 48 after last injection of initial treatment compared to the score at Baseline. Subjects are defined as responders if they are showing an \>=1 point improvement in MVDSS at the respective visit relative to baseline.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 36, and 48
The Percentage of Responders on the 5-point Mid-Face Volume Deficit Severity Scale (MVDSS) at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 as Rated by the Independent Blinded Photographic Reviewer
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Center for Dermatology Cosmetic & Laser Surgery
Fremont, California, United States
Cosmetic Laser Dermatology
San Diego, California, United States
About Skin
Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States
Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research
Aventura, Florida, United States
Skin Associates of South Florida
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Meridian Clinical Research, Georgia Plastic Surgery
Savannah, Georgia, United States
Chicago Cosmetic
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Skin Specialists
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
...and 6 more locations
The percentage of responders on the 5-point MVDSS (Mid-Face Volume Deficit Severity Scale where 0 means no deficit and 4 means Extreme Deficit), based on the independent blinded photographic reviewer´s assessment by using photographs at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 after last injection of initial treatment compared to the score at Baseline. The median of all assessments for the same photograph were taken into account.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48
Mean Change in Midface Volume Deficit
Mean change in midface volume deficit measured on the 5-point MVDSS (Mid-Face Volume Deficit Severity Scale where 0 means no deficit and 4 means Extreme Deficit), and based on the blinded evaluator´s live assessment at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 after last injection of initial treatment compared to the score at Baseline.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48
Mean Change in Midface Volume Deficit as Measured by Volumetric Change Measurement
Mean change in midface volume deficit as measured by volumetric change measurement by using 3D digital photographic images at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 after last injection of initial treatment compared to Baseline.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48
Change in Nasolabial Folds Measurements
Shift from baseline in nasolabial folds measured by the 5-point validated NLF-SRS (Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale, where 0 means no NLF and 4 means Extreme Nasolabial fold) based on the blinded evaluator´s live assessment at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 after last injection of initial treatment.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48
Proportion of Subjects With Global Aesthetic Improvement Based on Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Rated by Blinded Evaluator
The percentage of subjects with a global aesthetic improvement over baseline (subjects who have been rated as "much improved" or "improved"), based on the blinded evaluator's assessment at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48, after last injection of initial treatment phase using the 5-point modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The blinded evaluators assess aesthetic improvement via photographs comparing baseline photos against the respective study visit week photo with the following possible 5 outcomes: "Much worse", "Worse", "No change", "Improved", "Much improved".
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48
Proportion of Subjects With Global Aesthetic Improvement Based on Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Rated by Subject
The percentage of subjects with a global aesthetic improvement over baseline (subjects who have been rated as "much improved" or "improved"), based on the subject's assessment at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48, after last injection of initial treatment phase using the 5-point modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The subjects assess aesthetic improvement via photographs comparing baseline photos against the respective study visit week photo with the following possible 5 outcomes: "Much worse", "Worse", "No change", "Improved", "Much improved".
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48
Satisfaction With Outcome Based on FACE-Q(TM) Assessed by Subjects
The extent of subject's satisfaction with overall treatment outcome at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 after last injection of initial treatment phase as assessed by the subject using the Face-Q(TM) Questionnaire "Satisfaction with Outcome". This validated patient reported outcome is based on subject's answers to pre-specified questions with answers ranging as 1="Definitely disagree", 2="Somewhat disagree", 3="Somewhat agree", 4="Definitely agree". The answers are mathematically transferred to one single numerical result between 100 and 0, where 100 reflects the highest possible satisfaction and 0 means the lowest possible satisfaction.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48
Appearance Appraisal Based on FACE-Q(TM) Assessed by Subjects
The extent of subject's appearance appraisal at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 after last injection of initial treatment phase as assessed by the FACE-Q(TM) questionnaire "Satisfaction with Cheeks" compared to Baseline visit (i.e., change from baseline). This validated patient reported outcome is based on subject's answers to pre-specified questions with answers ranging as 1="Very Dissatisfied", 2="Somewhat Dissatisfied", 3="Somewhat Satisfied", 4="Very Satisfied". The answers are mathematically transferred to one single numerical result between 100 and 0, where 100 reflects the highest possible satisfaction and 0 means the lowest possible satisfaction.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48
Pain Assessment by Subjects
Assessment of pain associated with the procedure by subjects immediately after injection and about 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes thereafter for initial treatment at baseline and for touch-up treatment at week 2 (if applicable). Subjects quantified the pain associated with the procedure using a semi-quantitative 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS): 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain you can imagine. Left and right side of the face was assessed separately.
Time frame: Baseline - Immediately after end of treatment and 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes after end of treatment; Week 2 - Immediately after end of treatment and 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes after end of treatment
Evaluation of Injection Volume
Injection volume required to achieve optimal aesthetic result at each treatment (baseline and touch-up treatment together) measured in mL.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 2