We are testing a smartphone app that provides therapy for depression. Participants will also receive short weekly virtual appointments with a therapist. Researchers want to know if this new treatment is usable, whether participants are satisfied with it, and whether it can help lower symptoms.
The purpose of this project is to conduct an open trial to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a new therapist-guided smartphone-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for major depressive disorder (MDD). This treatment will include unlimited access to the mobile CBT for depression app over 8 weeks plus 8 virtual visits with a doctoral-level psychologist or psychology intern with their master's degree. The therapist will be assigned once eligibility is determined. All virtual sessions will be no longer than 16-25 min. The combined CBT app plus virtual treatment will be tested in 28 patients. Clinical assessments will occur at baseline, mid-treatment (week 4), end-of-treatment (week 8), and 3 month follow-up. The investigators hypothesize that this treatment will be feasible, acceptable to participants, and lead to reductions in depression symptoms and functional impairment as well as improvements in quality of life from baseline to end-of-treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
28
All participants will receive the app-delivered CBT, including modules such as cognitive skills (e.g., cognitive restructuring, core belief work), behavioral skills (e.g., activity scheduling), and mindfulness. Therapists will also conduct brief weekly virtual appointments with participants.
Massachusetts
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Drop-Out Rates
To determine feasibility, we will report rates of and reasons for participant dropout from the trial.
Time frame: assessed at end-of-treatment (week 8)
Change in Patient Satisfaction (as Measured by the CSQ-8)
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) is an 8-item self-report questionnaire which assesses the satisfaction with clinical services received. Each item uses a 4-point Likert scale. Items are summed for a total score ranging from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Time frame: Measured at midpoint (week 4) and end-of-treatment (week 8)
Change in Treatment Credibility (as Measured by the CEQ)
The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) is a 6-item, self-report questionnaire. Items 1-3 assess clients' impressions of the treatment credibility; they are scored on Likert scales ranging from 1 to 9 (e.g., from 1='not at all' to 9='very much'). Items are summed for a total score that can range from 3 to 27, where higher scores mean greater treatment credibility.
Time frame: Change in credibility from baseline (week 0) to midpoint (week 4)
Change in Outcome Expectancy (as Measured by the CEQ)
The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) is a 6-item, self-report questionnaire. Items 4-6 are used to assess clients' outcome expectancy. Item 5 is scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 9 (where 1='not at all' to 9='very much'). Items 4 and 6 are scored on a scale from 0% to 100% (in 10-point increments); their scores are then converted linearly on a Likert scale from 1 to 9. Items are summed together for a total outcome expectancy score that can range from 3 to 27, where higher scores mean a higher outcome expectancy.
Time frame: Measured at baseline (week 0) and midpoint (week 4)
App Rating (as Measured by the uMARS)
The Mobile Application Rating Scale user version (uMARS) is a self-report form with 26 items that assess participant's evaluations of various app features. Dimensions of this measure include engagement (5 items), functionality (4 items), aesthetics (3 items), information quality (4 items); other items about app subjectivity quality (4 items) and perceived impact (6 items) are also available but do not contribute to the overall score (and are not reported here). Items are rated on differently worded 5-point Likert scales ranging from 1 (Inadequate) to 5 (Excellent). An overall app rating score can be calculated as the mean score of the first four subscales (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality; range of 1-5), where higher scores indicate higher overall perceived app quality.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Measured at endpoint (week 8)
Change in Treatment Utilization
Treatment utilization was assessed with a single question: "On average, how much time (in minutes) do you spend using the app or practicing skills from the app in total, per week?" Answers were collected as number of minutes in integer format, where more time spent on and off the app was interpreted as greater treatment utilization.
Time frame: Measured at midpoint (week 4) and end-of-treatment (week 8)
Change in MDD Symptom Severity (as Measured by the HAM-D)
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is the gold-standard clinician-administered assessment of depression symptom severity. It contains 21 items that are rated on a mixture of 3- and 5-point Likert scales. The first 17 items are summed for the total score, which can range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater depression severity.
Time frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8 (end of treatment), week 20 (follow-up)
Change in Functional Impairment (as Measured by the WSAS)
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a self-report measure that assesses impairment in occupational, social, and family areas. The WSAS is a 5-item measure that uses 9-point Likert scales ranging from 0 (no impairment at all) to 8 (very severe impairment). The items are summed for a total score ranging from 0 to 40, where higher scores mean higher functional impairment.
Time frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8 (end of treatment), week 20 (follow-up)
Change in Quality of Life (as Measured by the Q-LES-Q-SF)
The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a 16-item, self-report questionnaire that assesses life satisfaction over the past week. Each question is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). Questions 1-15 are then summed to a total score, and the total score is reported as a percentage maximum possible, such that the final percent score range is 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.
Time frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8 (end of treatment), week 20 (follow-up)