The main objective of this RCT is to test the efficacy of an emotion regulation group program (i.e., ART program) in college students, compared to an active control group (i.e., relaxation program). Using multilevel analyses, we expect an improvement in anxious-depressive symptomatology for both groups. However, we expect the ART group to improve specifically on emotion regulation flexibility ability, and the last to be a mediative variable on mental health.
Emotion regulation (ER) is a process associated with difficulties in mental health. Given its transdiagnostic features, its improvement could facilitate the recovery of various psychological issues. A limit of current studies is the lack of knowledge regarding whether available interventions improve ER flexibility (i.e., the ability to implement ER strategies in line with contextual demands), even though this capacity has been associated with better mental health and well-being. Therefore, the aim of the study is to test the efficacy of a 9-weeks ER group program (the Affect Regulation Training-ART), using the most appropriate measures (i.e., experience sampling method) in a student population. Plus, the goal of the study is to explore the potential mediative role of ER flexibility on mental health improvement. This RCT will compare the ART program group to an active control group (a relaxation program) in 100 participants. To test the mediative role of ER flexibility on mental health, daily measures will be used before, during, and after the interventions to evaluate the extent to which participants are flexible in their ER. Using multilevel analyses, we expect an improvement in anxious-depressive symptomatology for both groups. However, we expect the ART group to improve specifically on ER flexibility ability, and the last to be a mediative variable on mental health. This study will enhance knowledge on interventions for students and the impact of interventions on ER flexibility. Also, this research will improve knowledge on ecological measures for assessing the effect of interventions. Overall, this project represents new opportunities to improve ER skills to improve mental health in undergraduate students.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Session 1: Description of the group \& Psychoeducation Session 2: Breathing and muscle relaxation Session 3: Importance of practice/motivation Session 4: Nonjudgemental awareness Session 5: Acceptance and tolerance Session 6: Self-support Session 7: Analysis of emotions Session 8: Modification of emotions Session 9: Practice and contextual applications + end of group
Session 1: Description of the groupe \& Psychoeducation Session 2: Breathing control 1 Session 3: Breathing control 2 Session 4: Muscle relaxation Session 5: Visualisation Session 6: Stretching Session 7: Schultz relaxation Session 8: Schultz relaxation Session 9: Summary and end of group
Université Grenoble Alpes
Grenoble, France
RECRUITINGChange in Emotion regulation
Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire (score), higher scores mean better outcome, value minimum of 0 maximum 108
Time frame: 30 minutes
Change in Depressive symptoms
Beck Depressive Inventory Questionnaire (BDI-II) (score), higher scores mean worse outcome, value minimum of 0 maximum 63
Time frame: 20 minutes
Change in Anxious symptoms
Beck Anxiety Inventory Questionnaire (BAI) (score), higher scores mean worse outcome, value minimum of 0 maximum 63
Time frame: 20 minutes
Change in Daily Emotion regulation flexibility
Experience sampling method using PIEL application (flexibility in emotion regulation strategies) - Questionnaire on smartphone (score aggregated with the 3 times of measurements)
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
94