Anxiety disorders have the highest prevalence among mental disorders and cause considerable individual and financial costs. Current treatments do not relieve mental suffering of many patients. Understanding neurobiological mechanisms involved in pathological anxiety is a major scientific challenge.
Functional imaging work has made it possible to identify the brain regions involved in anxiety disorders but is insufficient to study the pathophysiological mechanisms that cause anxiety symptoms. Brain regions involved in anxiety disorders are located deep in the human brain, and their electrophysiological study requires invasive recording methods. Intracerebral electroencephalographic recordings (stereoelectroencephalography - sEEG) made for care in hospital before surgery in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, offer this unique opportunity. Indeed, the brain regions involved in anxiety are among the structures registered to delimit the epilepticogenic zone, and 20% of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy suffer from an anxiety disorder. This study propose to compare 15 patients suffering from drug-resistant epilepsy and generalized anxiety disorders (GAD), explored by intracranial sEEG, and 15 patients suffering from drug-resistant epilepsy without GAD ("controls"),explored by sEEG. During sEEG patient will be proposed to undergo a custom-made behavioral task design to allow clinically-relevant anxiogenic exposure. Patients will so be exposed to anxiety scenarios, while intracerebral sEEG, physiological stress parameters and the level of anxiety experienced will be monitored. Electrophysiological parameters will be compared and correlated with clinical characteristics of the population and outcomes of the task.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Subjects will be asked to describe their most anxious thoughts and write each of them in a detailed scenario. The scenarios will be based on the answers to the Worry and Anxiety Questionnaire, in order to validate the procedure by a standardized examination. During the task, the scenarios will be successively presented to the subjects, on a digital computer medium in written and oral format. Subjects will be asked to actively focus on these negative thoughts with maximum concern, without seeking to control their emotions.
Screening for depression and anxiety
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
RECRUITINGChange in neuronal coherence in the frontolimbic network
Change in neuronal coherence in the frontolimbic network between the basal condition and the expression of acute anxiety induced induced by exposure to an anxiety-inducing scenario between patients suffering from GAD and controls. Local brain activities tend to organize in oscillatory patterns. In order to determine if neurnal activities in frontal and limbic areas at similar oscillatory frequencies synchronize as a substrate or marker for anxiety, we will perform a coherence analysis. The coherence study estimates the consistency of the relative amplitude and phase of two signals in a given frequency spectrum, and will take its values in the interval \[0.1\]. The variation of coherence value will be compared between relevant epochs (anxiety-induced scenario and baseline) and between patients suffering from GAD and controls.
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Generalized Anxiety Disorders (GAD) severity score at The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) is widely used in research and clinical practice to measure the tendency to worry in general. it includes 16 items assessing the general tendency to worry in adults. Patients are asked to respond spontaneously to 16 proposals by selecting the mention that best suits them
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
SEEG power spectrum changes
the variation of power spectrum value or each frequency band (delta : \[0.5 - 3\] Hz, thêta : \]3 - 8\] Hz, alpha : \]8 - 12\] Hz, beta : \]12 - 25\] Hz, gamma \> 25 Hz) induced by exposure to an anxiety-inducing scenario will be compared between relevant epochs (anxiety-induced scenario and baseline) in patients suffering from GAD and controls, for each of the regions monitored.
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Wechsler adult intelligent scale Score (WAIS-R full scale IQ)
Test designed to measure the intellectual quotien (IQ) in terms of "verbal" and "performance". It is composed of 10 main mandatory subtests and 5 optional complementary subtests. These subtests are divided into four indices (verbal understanding, perceptual reasoning, working memory and processing speed). Scores ranged from 50 (minimum) to 150 (maximum).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Auditory and visual memory index (MEM IV)
Normal values depend on its calibration according to the age of the subject and its level of education) is a test designed and validated to evaluate the learning and auditory and visual memory of a subject. They test different aspects of memory, including immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition of visual and verbal stimuli.
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Quality of life scale applied to epilepsy (QOLI-E 31)
QOLI-E 31 containt 7 subtests evaluating the different health concepts (emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, cognitive functioning, crisis anxiety, drug effects and overall quality of life).
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Neurological Disorders Depression Inventoiry for Epilepsy (NDDI-E)
Self-questionnaire of depressive disorder testing validated for epilepsy. Scores ranged from 0 (minimum) to 24(maximum). It consists of six items assessing depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1: never 2: rarely; 3: sometimes; 4: always or often, over the last two weeks). The total score is obtained by adding the score obtained for each item. A total score strictly higher than 15 must be suspected depressive syndrome. This questionnaire is also validated and has excellent psychometric properties (sensitivity and specificity) in the clinical population with epilepsy.
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7- items (GAD-7)
Self-test for anxiety disorders, including Generalized Anxiety Disorder. It consists of seven items assessing psychological and somatic anxiety symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0: never; 1: several days; 2: more than half the time; 3: almost every day, over the last two weeks). The total score is obtained by adding the score obtained for each item (score ranging from 0 to 21). A total score strictly higher than 7 must make suspect a generalized anxiety disorder. If the score is higher than 7, it is advisable to have the diagnosis of TAG confirmed by a clinical psychiatric evaluation. This questionnaire is also validated and has excellent psychometric properties (sensitivity and specificity) in the clinical population with epilepsy.
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Scores ranged from 0 to 63. Self-assessment tool containing twenty-one elements that each describe one of the specific symptoms of depression. It can screen for recent depressive symptoms that have occurred in the past two weeks, and assess their severity. It can be used in subjects suffering from epilepsy. Each item is rated according to its intensity on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (light intensity) to 3 (severe intensity). The maximum BDI score is 63 and the threshold for defining the presence of depression varies from 10 to 17, depending on the studies
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score
Hetero-questionnaire of mood assessment. It is rated by a trained clinician in its passing and consists of 10 items that each have a general definition and six degrees of severity of a symptom, with degrees 0, 2, 4 and 6 being themselves defined. The overall score (0 - 60) results from the addition of item scores.
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
STAI is a two-part self-assessment questionnaire that independently assesses anxiety-trait and anxiety-state. They each include 20 items graduated in 4 degrees depending on their intensity or frequency. In the line-anxiety scale, the subject must indicate the point that best corresponds to the frequency of what he feels according to 4 degrees: 1 = almost never; 2 = sometimes; 3 = often; 4 = almost always. In the anxiety-state scale, the subject must indicate the point that best corresponds to the intensity of what he feels, also according to 4 degrees: 1 = no, 2 = rather no, 3 = rather yes, 4 = yes. The trait-anxiety scale is primarily used to assess the subject's usual anxiety temperament, while the state-anxiety scale is used to independently quantify current anxiety at the time of passing.
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
utoquestionnaire that allows a quantitative estimate of the intensity of the anxiety feeling. It consists of 21 items of symptoms and attitudes resulting from panic and generalized anxiety disorders, evaluated over the last 7 days, graduated from 0 to 3 according to a Lickert scale
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Hamilton Antiety rating Scale (HAM-A) Score
Hetero-questionnaire intended to measure the severity of anxiety. It consists of 14 items corresponding to psychic and somatic anxiety symptoms noted on a 5-point Likert scale (0 - 4, in the increasing sense of severity). The overall score (0 - 56) results from the addition of the scores of items Hamilton et al. 1959. This is a classic trans-nosographic measure of the severity of anxiety. Its usefulness in this study consists of its evaluation by one. e clinician, while all other measures of anxiety are informed by patients
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)
Analog Visual Scale (EVA) Anxiety score
Anxiety self-assessessed during Anxiety task with Anxiety analog visual scale. (EVA-A)
Time frame: Inclusion (Day 1)