Determine the impact of the Compañeros en Salud (Partners in Health) curriculum in conjunction with RT-CGM on glycemic control in Latinx patients with T2D. Participants will be randomized to receive the Companeros en Salud diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) intervention with or without RT-CGM
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing especially in the Latinx community and in family members of those already living with diabetes. Diabetes education is a cornerstone of treatment but is often not culturally tailored and there is limited data on benefit of virtual delivery of sessions. Real Time Continuous glucose monitoring is a tool to improve diabetes but is not readily available to those living with type 2 diabetes not on multiple doses of insulin. Furthermore here is little to no data on RT-CGM use in different minority populations. Data is also lacking on if diabetes education for an individual affects the family unit. We hypothesize that culturally tailored Diabetes self-management education using and support (DSMES) using a team approach of health educators and Community health workers will improve glycemic indices. We further hypothesis that RT-CGM coupled to DSMES will enhances glycemic benefit and change nutrition and activity behaviors. This will be a randomized control trial of 100 Latinx participants who will all receive culturally tailored DSMES with or without cycle RT-CGM over 12 weeks. Primary outcome will be mean A1C improvement at 12 and 24 weeks based on attendance of sessions and RT-CGM use. Secondary outcomes will be satisfaction with education and CGM, changes in weight, blood pressure and self-reported nutrition and exercise changes. This study will be the first study to examine how DSMES with and without RT-CGM use improves health outcomes in the Latinx population and their families
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
120
Dexcom G6 CGM device
University of Washington Diabetes Institute
Seattle, Washington, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Hemoglobin A1C
Percent change in A1C
Time frame: change at 12 weeks
CGM Mean Glucose
mean glucose at 12 weeks
Time frame: 12 weeks
CGM Percentage of Time in Range
percentage of time in range( tir)
Time frame: 12 WEEKS
Percent Change in BMI
percent change BMI ((kg/m2)
Time frame: change at 12 WEEKS
Blood Pressure Systolic
change in blood pressure
Time frame: change at 12 WEEKS
Physical Activity Questionnaire IPAQ
increase or decrease in days of vigorous activity - one question in IPAQ.
Time frame: 12 weeks
International Physical Activity Prevalence Study SELF-ADMINISTERED ENVIRONMENTAL MODULE(PANES):
Question Neighborhood Questionnaire/Neighborhood Safety questions 1 1\. In general, how do you feel about your neighborhood? Do you feel it's a very bad, a fairly bad, a fairly good, or a very good place to live? reported number that felt it was very bad or fairly bad
Time frame: baseline
PHQ9 Depression Score- Those With PHQ9>15
Scores less than 5 almost always signified the absence of a depressive disorder; scores of 5 to 9 predominantly represented patients with either no depression or subthreshold (i.e., other) depression; scores of 10 to 14 represented a spectrum of patients; and scores of 15 or greater usually indicated major depression.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 weeks
PAID-5 Problem Areas in Diabetes Those With Score > 8
the scale gives a total score from 0 to 20. A score of 8 and above indicates a high level of diabetes-related distress
Time frame: score at 12 weeks
Self-care for Diabetes (SDSCA) Number of Days Reporting Self Care
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities asks patient about diabetes self-care activities during the past 7 days and for each activity they can answer 0 days out of the week to a max of 7 days out of the week with higher score indicating more days doing this self -care activity and positive results
Time frame: composite score at 12 weeks
Modified Joslin Diabetes Center CGM Experience
Experiences of CGM @Joslin 2009 scale range from 5 (strongly agree) to 1 ( strongly disagree) statements/questions that measured the amount of satisfaction that was derived from use of continuous glucose monitoring. Higher score meant perceived benefit/ better outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks
Perception of Behavior Modification After Real-Time- CGM Use
Did use of Real-Time- cgm in intervention group contribute to a healthier lifestyle ? yes
Time frame: at 12 weeks
Household/Family Member Perception of Lifestyle Changes
household members perception of lifestyle changes after family member participated in education with CGM. Overall, do you feel Continuous Glucose Monitoring contributed to your making changes for a healthier lifestyle? yes
Time frame: 12 weeks
Pedometer
average number of steps per day
Time frame: at 12 weeks
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes
the scale is 1-10 and the score is the mean of the eight items. If more than two items are missing, do not score the scale. Higher number indicates higher self-efficacy
Time frame: score at 12 weeks
Food Insecurity Short Form 6 Question Composite With Score Reported as a Composite: High or Marginal Food Security, Low Food Security, Very Low Food Security
number of participants that had high or marginal food security based on 6 questions (geared to assess access or lack of access to food) composite score
Time frame: baseline