This study will examine the impact of Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) group, using self-report measures, on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), emotional dysregulation, borderline personality disorder symptoms, global psychopathology, and access to quality mental health care. Aims include assessing the feasibility of STAIR, reducing patients' trauma and emotion dysregulation symptoms, examining whether STAIR may be used as an alternative to DBT for patients on the DBT, and improving patient satisfaction and clinic efficiency
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Clinician led session that hones in on a particular deficit within these skills, including identifying and labeling emotions, managing emotions, tolerating distress, accepting feelings and increasing positive emotions, identifying trauma-based interpersonal schemas, identifying conflict between trauma-related feelings and goals, role plays surrounding issues of power and control, and role-plays related to developing flexibility in interpersonal situations involving power differentials. STAIR is a cognitive-behavioral treatment that addresses emotion regulation and interpersonal difficulties and their impact on daily living.
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Number of participants who complete the STAIR intervention
This number will include those who attend the 12 weeks of STAIR with no more than three missed sessions
Time frame: Week 12
Total score of patient treatment satisfaction ratings
Calculate the total score for each participant on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8, and find the average of those scores. Scores are summed across items. Items 2, 4, 5, and 8 are reverse scored. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.
Time frame: Week 12
Frequency of participant attendance
Calculate the number of patients who attended each week of the STAIR treatment.
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Change in emotion regulation total score from baseline to Week 12
Problems with emotion regulation will be assessed using the Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale. Total score ranges from 36 to 180. Higher scores indicate greater problems with emotion regulation.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change in the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder symptom total score from baseline to Week 12
The severity of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms is measured using the PCL-5. Items are rated using a 5-point likert scale ranging from 0 "not at all" to 4 "extremely." All 20 items are summed to obtain a total score (0 to 80), higher scores indicate higher severity of PTSD symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change in Borderline symptom severity total score from baseline to Week 12
Using the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Scale comprising of 15 items using a likert scale rated from 5 "Almost Always" to 1 "Almost Never." There are three subscales that comprise this measure: (1) Thoughts and Emotions (2) Behaviors-Negative and (3) Behaviors-Positive. The total for each subscale is determined to score the BEST. The scores of subscales A and B are then added together and the total from subscale C is subtracted. A correction factor of 15 is added to yield the final score which can range from 12 (best) to 72 (worst).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change in Borderline Symptom List-23 total score from baseline to Week 12
This measure assesses feelings and experiences commonly endorsed by patients with BPD. The 23-item scale utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all" to 4 = "very strong." The BSL-23 is scored by summing up the scores for all of the items. Total score ranges from 0 to 92, with higher scores reflecting more severe borderline personality symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change in current symptoms of psychopathology and psychological distress total score from baseline to Week 12
The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised is a 90-item multidimensional self-report symptom measure that assesses current symptoms of psychopathology and psychological distress. The items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). It assesses nine symptom dimensions (somatization, obsessive compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, psychoticism). Global measures are provided to summarize overall distress, and these include the Global Severity Index, Positive Symptom Distress Index, and Positive Symptom Total. Raw scores are calculated by dividing the sum of scores for a specific dimension by the number of items in the dimension. Global severity index is calculated by summing the scores of the nine dimensions and additional items, then dividing by the total number of responses. Total score ranges from 0 to 360. Higher scores indicate worsening of disease.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.