This study is designed to investigate the effectiveness of plaque control intervention by home-use dual-light aPDT Lumoral -device as an adjunctive or alternative treatment to triamcinolone acetonide (TCA) mouth rinse or other topical corticosteroid treatment on the symptoms and clinical appearance of symptomatic gingival involvement of oral lichen planus (OLP).
Oral Lichen Planus (OLP) is a relatively common, chronic immune-mediated mucocutaneous disease,that usually occurs on the oral mucosa surfaces. Oral lesions are commonly multiple with a bilateral and symmetrical localization. Most affected sites in the oral cavity are the buccal and lingual mucosa, and the gingiva. Approximately 10% of patients with OLP present manifestations in the gingiva. Lumoral is a CE-marked medical device developed to provide a potent, targeted antibacterial action on dental plaque in a home environment. The device mechanism of action is antibacterial photodynamic therapy (aPDT). The device is used by swishing a mouth rinse, which has a strong adherence to dental plaque. The plaque-adhered photoactive mouth rinse can be activated by a simple to use light applicator. Use of the device can improve supragingival plaque control. Preliminary results have shown a promising anti-inflammatory response in addition to plaque reduction. A total of 60 subjects with histologically confirmed diagnosis of OLP with gingival involvement are enrolled to the study. The subjects are randomized to a study group and a control group. Both groups will use topical corticosteroid treatment for two weeks. In addition, the study group will use Lumoral-device initially once a day. All the subjects shall be assessed for desquamative gingivitis clinical score (DGCS), Escudier Index (EI), visible plaque index (VPI), bleeding on probing index (BOP), pain score (VAS), aMMP-8 inflammation marker and oral candidosis. These analyses shall be performed at baseline and at 4 week, 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment started. In addition, psychosocial factors shall be assessed by the graded chronic pain scale (GCPS), the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) and the generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7) questionnaires at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the treatment initiation. Primary outcome is improvement in average Pain score (VAS) symptom diary during the 12 month study period.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
The investigational Lumoral treatment -device provides a constant and repeatable application which can be done at home and is easily available. All subjects in the study group will receive their own Lumoral treatment -device and Lumorinse-mouth rinse tablets for the complete duration of the study.
Both groups shall be given oral and written instructions for twice-daily standard oral hygiene self care.
Tampere University Hospital, Oral and maxillofacial diseases
Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland
Wellbeing services County Pirkanmaa, Health Services, Orthodontics and specialized dental care
Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland
Pain score symptom diary (based on Visual Analogue Scale - VAS)
Improvement in average Pain score (VAS) symptom diary during the 12 month study period. Assessments: 1. '365 Average pain score' (VAS) is determined by calculating the average of the pain scores marked in the diary during the total surveillance period of one year; 2. '52 Average pain score' (VAS) is determined by calculating the average of the pain scores of calendar weeks during the total surveillance period of one year; 3. 'Positive 52 Average pain score' (VAS) is determined by including the '52 Average pain scores' of those calendar weeks, which have VAS average over 2.
Time frame: 12 months
aMMP-8
Reduction in inflammation marker aMMP-8 measured by Periosafe®
Time frame: 12 Months
Visible plaque index (VPI)
Improvement in visible plaque index (VPI)
Time frame: 12 Months
Bleeding on probing index (BOP)
Improvement in the bleeding on probing index (BOP)
Time frame: 12 Months
Escudier Index (EI)
Improvement in OLP measured by the Escudier Index (EI)
Time frame: 12 Months
Visual Analogue Scale - VAS
Improvement in pain score (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS). Subjects will be asked to rate their pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10: 0 = 'no symptoms'; 10 = 'very severe pain'. The amount of improvement in experienced pain is calculated by the following formula: N = \[100% × (pre-treatment VAS score-post treatment VAS score)\]/pre-treatment VAS score. This result is classified as follows: score 5 = lack of pain or discomfort N=100%; score 4 = marked improvement 75%≤N\<100%; scores 3 and 2 = moderate improvement 25%≤N\<75%; score 1 = mild improvement 0%\<N\<25%; score 0 = no improvement N=0. The VAS will be monitored both as a daily home-use diary and as a single question at the clinic during the follow-up visits.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Time frame: 12 Months
Visual Analogue Scale - VAS
Improvement in pain score (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS). Subjects will be asked to rate their pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10: 0 = 'no symptoms'; 10 = 'very severe pain'. The amount of improvement in experienced pain is calculated by the following formula: N = \[100% × (pre-treatment VAS score-post treatment VAS score)\]/pre-treatment VAS score. This result is classified as follows: score 5 = lack of pain or discomfort N=100%; score 4 = marked improvement 75%≤N\<100%; scores 3 and 2 = moderate improvement 25%≤N\<75%; score 1 = mild improvement 0%\<N\<25%; score 0 = no improvement N=0. The VAS will be monitored both as a daily home-use diary and as a single question at the clinic during the follow-up visits.
Time frame: 6 Months
Visual Analogue Scale - VAS
Improvement in pain score (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS). Subjects will be asked to rate their pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10: 0 = 'no symptoms'; 10 = 'very severe pain'. The amount of improvement in experienced pain is calculated by the following formula: N = \[100% × (pre-treatment VAS score-post treatment VAS score)\]/pre-treatment VAS score. This result is classified as follows: score 5 = lack of pain or discomfort N=100%; score 4 = marked improvement 75%≤N\<100%; scores 3 and 2 = moderate improvement 25%≤N\<75%; score 1 = mild improvement 0%\<N\<25%; score 0 = no improvement N=0. The VAS will be monitored both as a daily home-use diary and as a single question at the clinic during the follow-up visits.
Time frame: 3 Months
Oral Lichen Planus (OLP) relapse
Improvement in OLP relapse rate measured by a decreased need for additional/ repeated treatment with corticosteroid treatment, tacrolimus, or other anti-inflammatory treatment
Time frame: 12 Months
Use of corticosteroid treatment
Reduction in the use of corticosteroid treatment according to the anti-inflammatory potency
Time frame: 6 Months
Graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) questionnaire (authors: Von Korff M et al. 1992)
Improvement in psychosocial factors assessed by the graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) questionnaire. Grading is based on answering a ten-scale questionnaire from 0, 'no pain' to 10, 'worst possible pain'.
Time frame: 12 Months
Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire (author: Slade 1997)
Improvement in psychosocial factors assessed by the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire. The OHIP-14 is a questionnaire that measures people's perception of the social impact of oral disorders on their well-being. Fourteen items of OHIP are divided into seven dimensions: functional limitation, physical discomfort, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicaps. Grading is based on answering a five-scale questionnaire from 'Never' to 'Very often'.
Time frame: 12 Months
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire (authors: Spitzer RL et al. 2006)
Improvement in psychosocial factors assessed by the generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7) questionnaires. Grading is based on answering a four-scale questionnaire from 0, 'never' to 3, 'almost daily'.
Time frame: 12 Months
Oral candidosis
Reduction in number of subjects with oral candidosis during the treatment
Time frame: 12 Months
Desquamative gingivitis clinical score (DGCS)
Improvement in OLP measured by the Desquamative Gingivitis Clinical Score (DGCS) by 20 %. The DGCS is a scoring system specifically designed to score the gingival lesions of oral lichen planus. Scoring: 0 = no detectable lesions present; 1 = white lesion; 2 = mild erythema (\< 3 mm from gingival margins); 3 = bulla or marked erythema (\> 3 mm from gingival margins); 4 = erosion or ulcer
Time frame: 12 Months