The purpose of this research study is to determine whether continuous glucose monitors (CGM) are a safe, effective, and acceptable way to evaluate type 2 diabetes risk in youth as compared to the standard 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This study will involve wearing a CGM, wearing a physical activity tracker, responding to surveys, and completing at-home glucose and mixed food challenge while wearing the CGM. Subjects will also be asked to complete an interview by phone or videoconference after wearing the CGM.
Youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D), an increasingly common and aggressive disease that disproportionately impacts racial and ethnic minorities, presents several diagnostic challenges. The rapid loss of glycemic control soon after T2D diagnosis makes early identification an important goal in pediatrics, and risk-based screening has been recommended for children for over two decades. However, the screening tests currently used in practice, including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting glucose, and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), have significant drawbacks. Real-time continuous glucose monitors (CGM) are promising new tools for risk stratification in individuals with dysglycemia. These patient-worn medical devices measure interstitial glucose every 5 minutes and offer glimpses into an individual's everyday life, which may include consumption of carbohydrates in amounts larger than that assessed in an OGTT, enhancing test sensitivity. Whether use of CGMs to evaluate type 2 diabetes risk in free-living youth is feasible and acceptable to patients and families is unknown. Assessment of CGM with standardized, but practical, home-based glucose and mixed-meal challenges is needed to determine facilitators and barriers to use of this technology-driven approach in clinical practice. Without advancement in the approach to screening for youth-onset T2D, there is ongoing risk of failure to understand which individuals are at highest risk for complications and could benefit the most from intervention early in the disease process. In this single-arm prospective study, participants will attend one in-person study visit to complete 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test after overnight fast. Participants will wear a continuous glucose monitor and a wrist-worn actigraphy device for physical activity and sleep measurement for 10 days beginning on the day of the study visit, then return the monitors by mail. During the 10 day wear period, participants will respond to text message-based surveys to document food intake, physical activity, and sleep times and will complete two at-home challenges: 1) glucose challenge using study-provided glucose beverage that is identical to that they consume during clinical oral glucose tolerance test; and 2) food challenge with mixed carbohydrate/fat/protein-containing food of their choice. Glucose trends during these at-home challenges will be compared with oral glucose tolerance test obtained during the study visit. Individual interviews will be conducted upon completion of CGM wear to assess acceptability of the use of at-home glucose challenge and CGM wear as a strategy to evaluate diabetes risk in youth.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
Participants will wear blinded Dexcom G6 Pro continuously for 10 days in their home environment. Two challenges will be completed at home: 1) glucose, using 1.75 g/kg (max 75g) glucose beverage provided by study team, and 2) mixed food, containing 50g carb as well as protein and fat content of participant's choice.
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Feasibility of CGM Use to Determine Type 2 Diabetes Risk
Completeness of CGM data (≥ 80% of days with data)
Time frame: 10 days
Acceptability of CGM Use for At-home T2D Risk Evaluation in Youth
Interview-based assessment. Participants rated their experience with CGM-OGTT using a Likert-like scale from 1-5 (1= terrible, 2=bad, 3=neutral, 4=good, 5=excellent). Acceptability was defined as a pre-specified threshold of ≥80% of participants providing a neutral or higher rating.
Time frame: 30 minutes
Sensitivity of At-home CGM-measured Glucose Challenge
Sensitivity of CGM-glucose 2 hours after at-home glucose beverage ingestion to predict OGTT-2h≥140 mg/dL
Time frame: 2 Hour Point of Home-OGTT
Specificity of At-home CGM-measured Glucose Challenge
Specificity of CGM-glucose 2 hours after at-home glucose beverage ingestion to predict OGTT-2h≥140 mg/dL
Time frame: 2 Hour Point of Home-OGTT
Positive Predictive Value of At-home, CGM-measured Glucose Challenge
Positive predictive value of CGM-glucose 2 hours after at-home glucose beverage ingestion to predict OGTT-2h≥140 mg/dL
Time frame: 2 Hour Point of Home-OGTT
Negative Predictive Value of At-home, CGM-measured Glucose Challenge
Negative predictive value of CGM-glucose 2 hours after at-home glucose beverage ingestion to predict OGTT-2h≥140 mg/dL
Time frame: 2 Hour Point of Home-OGTT
Sensitivity of At-home CGM-measured Fasting Glucose
Sensitivity of baseline CGM-glucose at the time of at-home glucose beverage ingestion to predict fasting OGTT ≥100 mg/dL
Time frame: 5 Minute Point of Home-OGTT
Specificity of At-home CGM-measured Fasting Glucose
Specificity of baseline CGM-glucose at the time of at-home glucose beverage ingestion to predict fasting OGTT ≥100 mg/dL
Time frame: 5 Minute Point of Home-OGTT
Positive Predictive Value of At-home CGM-measured Fasting Glucose
Positive predictive value of baseline CGM-glucose at the time of at-home glucose beverage ingestion to predict fasting OGTT ≥100 mg/dL
Time frame: 5 Minute Point of Home-OGTT
Negative Predictive Value of At-home CGM-measured Fasting Glucose
Negative predictive value of baseline CGM-glucose at the time of at-home glucose beverage ingestion to predict fasting OGTT ≥100 mg/dL
Time frame: 5 Minute Point of Home-OGTT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.