The Study will be conducted to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. The primary goal for the study is 1. To evaluate the efficacy of ENZ215 when compared to Prolia® in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, in terms of change in BMD at the lumbar spine from baseline to Month 12 and 2. To compare the AUEC of sCTX levels from baseline to Month 6
The study will be divided into three periods: Screening period: up to 35 days; Double-blind treatment period of 12 months; and Open-label, switch-over period of six months. Five hundred four (504) patients (252 patients in each treatment arm) will be enrolled in this study. All eligible patients will be randomized in the double blind treatment period in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ENZ215 or Prolia® (60 mg) subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 and Month 6. These participants will complete study at 12 months. A PK sub-study will be conducted in a subset of 120 participants with 60 participants in each arm. A subset of 120 participants randomised to Prolia arm and who completed 12 months of the double-blind treatment period without any significant safety concerns per the Investigator's discretion will be offered to enroll in the open-label, switch-over extension period. After re-consenting for the open-label, switch-over study, the participants will be re-randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ENZ215 or Prolia® (60 mg) SC at Month 12. These participants will complete the study at Month 18.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
504
To Evaluate the Efficacy of ENZ215 When Compared to Prolia in Patients With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, in Terms of Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine.
The percentage change in BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4 region) measured by DXA from baseline to month 12 and the mean (±SD) percentage change over time is displayed for the ITT set. The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study intervention in the double-blind treatment period. In the ITT analysis set, treatment was assigned based on the study intervention to which participants were randomised, regardless of which treatment they actually received.
Time frame: Month 12
Area Under the Effect Curve (AUEC) of % Change From Baseline (%CfB) of Serum C-telopeptide of Type-1 Collagen (sCTX) Levels
The AUEC of %CfB in sCTX of ENZ215 was assessed as part of pharmacodynamics assessment to compare with Prolia® in female participants with postmenopausal osteoporosis. This outcome measure was assessed for initial 6 months
Time frame: Month 6
To Compare the Immunogenicity Potential of ENZ215 and Prolia
ADAs incidence such as ADA positive, ADA negative, NAB positive, NAB negative assessed at baseline and different timepoints from 1 month to 12 months and during open-label switch over period assessed. Subjects were considered as post-treatment ADA and NAb positive if they had at least one "Positive" ADA and NAb result after the first drug exposure. Post-treatment ADA and NAb status was determined regardless of the results at pre-dose.
Time frame: From Baseline to Month 12 for Double blind treatment period and to month 18 for Open label switchover treatment period
To Compare the Pharmacokinetics of ENZ215 and Prolia
Comparison of PK parameters of ENZ215 and Prolia over 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University Hospital
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Medical Center Teodora,
Rousse, Bulgaria
DCC XVII-Sofia EOOD
Sofia, Bulgaria
Research Center(Medical Center Synexus Sofia EOOD)
Sofia, Bulgaria
Research Center
Brno, Czechia
G-CENTRUM Olomouc
Horní Město, Czechia
Research Center
Pardubice, Czechia
University Hospital.
Pilsen, Czechia
Synexus Czech
Prague, Czechia
Clinic
Prague, Czechia
...and 38 more locations
Serum Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (sP1NP) Levels
Percent change from baseline in type 1 N-terminal propeptide (sP1NP) levels at 6 months
Time frame: Month 6
To Compare the Change in BMD at the Lumbar Spine at Month 6
Percentage change in BMD at lumbar spine measured by DXA from baseline at month 6
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
To Compare the Change in BMD at Total Hip and Femoral Neck
Percentage change in BMD at total hip and femoral neck measured by DXA from baseline to Month to predefined timepoint
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12