Mechanisms of Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) to Alter Pain Sensitivity in Knee Osteoarthritis

Overview

The purposes of this 1-year proof of feasibility and acceptability pilot study are twofold. First to determine if participants with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) will comply with taking palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) dietary supplement for 6 weeks and adhere to taking it as directed. Second is to gain preliminary data to elucidate mechanisms (protein signatures, inflammatory markers and neurobiological signaling pathways) by which PEA, a lipid-based endocannabinoid, works to alter pain sensitivity in adults with KOA. In the simplest terms possible, we need to provide evidence that PEA changes the protein signature in order to provide evidence to establish mechanism.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) affects nearly 30% of adults aged 60 years or older and causes significant pain and disability.1 Neurophysiological testing (quantitative sensory testing (QST)) demonstrates that KOA pain has both peripheral and central mechanisms, which vary by individual.2 Adults with central KOA pain tend to be resistant to traditional pain treatment and have substantial pain even after knee replacement surgery.3 There is a growing body of evidence to support the scientific premise that endocannabinoids and related molecules, in particular PEA, can improve KOA pain through anti-inflammatory and analgesic pathways.4,5 PEA has little or no known side effects and is safe for human consumption.6 However, there is little known regarding the specific mechanisms by which PEA works to relieve KOA pain or for whom it might work best. We will begin to address this mechanistic question in this pilot study, which will provide data regarding therapeutic strategies within the endocannabinoid system to reduce KOA pain. The National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine report on the Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids (2017), supports cannabinoids as treatment for chronic pain, but highlighted the need for quality clinical trials. To fill this gap, the purpose of this study is to explore the impact of oral PEA, a non-psychoactive endocannabinoid enhancer with little to no side effects, to alter pain related biomarkers. Our central hypothesis is that PEA will alter pain related protein signatures, inflammatory markers, and neurophysiological changes in adults with KOA pain. The investigators propose a crossover clinical trial of 20 adults with self-reported medical diagnosis of KOA and knee pain (min 4/10 on numeric rating scale). This study will explore mechanisms of taking 1200mg of oral PEA daily for seven days (loading dose) then 600 mg daily for an additional 5 weeks (six weeks total). Ten participants will take PEA for 6 weeks while the other ten will receive placebo. Then the groups will switch, with the first group receiving placebo and the second group receiving PEA. PEA takes 4 to 6 weeks to reduce KOA pain. 4,5 Participants will have blood drawn and quantitative sensory testing at baseline, 6- and 12-weeks follow-up. Participants will be asked to bring in their PEA/placebo bottles for pill counts to track adherence and will be asked about side effects at each study visit. The investigators will test the central hypothesis and attain the objectives via the following specific aims: Specific Aim 1: To examine the impact of oral PEA placebo on the protein signature of adults with KOA pain. We will use high-resolution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to examine the entire proteome of the platelet rich plasma (isolated from whole blood) from each participant/time point to explore whether the PEA can alter the signaling pathways ascribed to KOA pain. We hypothesize that PEA will reduce the pro-inflammatory signaling pathways in the systemic proteome among participants in the PEA groups as compared to placebo. Specific Aim 2: To elucidate the effects of oral PEA vs. placebo on systemic inflammatory markers related to KOA pain. We will measure key inflammatory markers in KOA including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, c-reactive protein (CRP) and tumor necrosis factor-α at each study visit. We hypothesize that PEA will reduce the expression of inflammatory markers seen after walking in KOA participants as compared to placebo. Specific Aim 3: To determine the alterations in neurophysiological changes as measured by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) among participants taking PEA vs. placebo. For QST, we will measure the pressure pain detection and threshold, heat and cold detection and threshold, and mechanical temporal summation at the affected knee and contralateral forearm at each study visit. We hypothesize that PEA will alter central and peripheral pain pathways among adults with KOA. We will also compare the biologic pain pathways to the proteome and inflammatory markers.