Autogenous bone, with its osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteo-conductive characteristics has been used for bone grafts with optimal integration into host tissues. For this reason, autogenous bone has been often considered the gold standard of bone regeneration material. However, the amount of autogenous bone that may be harvested is limited, and the harvesting procedure is traumatic. Bone substitutes, including allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts have been used successfully as alternatives to autogenous bone grafts in ridge augmentation procedures. In 2008, autogenous tooth bone graft (ATG) was introduced and used for the first time as a bone grafting material for GBR. The tooth contents are extremely similar to that of the alveolar bone. The enamel inorganic, organic, and water contents are 95 percent, 0.6 percent, and 4 percent, respectively. However, in the dentin, the percentages are 70 to 75 percent, 20 percent, and 10 percent, respectively. They are 65 percent, 25 percent, and 10 percent, respectively, when compared to the alveolar bone content. The aim of this study is to compare ridge augmentation using autogenous bone block (ABB) with immediate implant placement and filling the generated gap with autogenous bone graft (ABG) or ATG, or ridge augmentation using xenograft bone block (XBB) with immediate implant placement and filling the generated gap with ATG.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
30
Ridge augmentation using ABB and ATG as a graft material with simultaneous implant placement
Ridge augmentation using XBB and ATG as a graft material with simultaneous implant placement
Ridge augmentation using ABB and ABG as a graft material with simultaneous implant placement
Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University
Kafr ash Shaykh, Egypt
Clinical evaluation probing pocket depth and amount of bone around simultaneously placed dental implants
Changes on pocket depth and amount of bone using ABG or ATG with ABB or XBB around simultaneously placed dental implants
Time frame: 9 months
radiographic outcome measuring the amount of bone around simultaneously placed dental implants
the radiographic outcome by measuring the amount of bone by using ATG or ABG on bone formation with ABB or XBB around simultaneously placed dental implants
Time frame: 9 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.