This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of OTT166 Ophthalmic solution in participants with Diabetic Retinopathy.
This randomized, double-masked, vehicle controlled, phase 2 study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of OTT166 ophthalmic solution in participants with diabetic retinopathy and select an optimum dosing regimen for Phase 3 pivotal trials. Approximately 210 participants diagnosed with moderately severe to severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or mild proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and who are treatment naïve (ie, no prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor \[anti-VEGF\] or laser \[focal, grid, pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP)\] administered) will be randomized 2:2:1:1 into the following groups: OTT166 5% twice daily (BID), OTT166 5% four times daily (QID), vehicle control BID, vehicle control QID. Randomization will be stratified by baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score (47 or 53 or 61B). Participants with PDR (DRSS score 61B) will be capped at 20% of all randomized participants. Each group will self-administer one 50-μl eye drop of study solution (frequency as assigned) for 24 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
225
Participants will receive OTT166 ophthalmic solution
Participants will receive vehicle control
Proportion of Participants Who Improved by ≥ 2 Steps From Baseline in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) Scores
To characterize the efficacy of topical OTT166 in participants with DR, the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) was used. The DRSS ranges from 10 to 85 in 12 discrete steps with higher score representing worse DR. The DRSS values were determined by the central reading center. The data reported are the estimated percentage of participants that improved by at least 2 steps from baseline. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol.
Time frame: At week 24
Proportion of Participants That Developed Worse Than Mild PDR (DRSS 65 and Above)
To determine if topical OTT166 prevented or delayed the occurrence of worse than mild PDR, DRSS of 65 and above. The higher the DRSS, the greater the risk of vision loss and thus the standard of care is to treat affected patients aggressively. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol.
Time frame: At week 24
Proportion of Participants Who Developed ASNV
To determine if topical OTT166 prevented or delayed the occurrence of anterior segment neovascularization (ASNV). Measure is the percentage of patients that developed ASNV at 24 weeks. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol.
Time frame: At week 24
Development of PDR Worse Than Mild (Wtm) (DRSS 65 and Above)
To determine if topical OTT166 prevented or delayed the occurrence of worse than mild PDR (wtmPDR). The determination was made using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The estimated percentage that progressed to wtmPDR by Week 24 is reported. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol.
Time frame: At week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Clinical Site 123
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Clinical Site 150
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Clinical Site 111
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Clinical Site 113
Encino, California, United States
Clinical Site 138
Fresno, California, United States
Clinical Site 129
Huntington Beach, California, United States
Clinical Site 121
Pasadena, California, United States
Clinical Site 127
Pasadena, California, United States
Clinical Site 142
Rancho Cordova, California, United States
Clinical Site 116
Riverside, California, United States
...and 58 more locations
Proportion of Participants Who Developed CI-DME
To determine if topical OTT166 prevented or delayed the occurrence of CI-DME. CI-DME is defined as the presence of fluid in the central subfield in participants who have no fluid at baseline or CST\> 325 μm. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol.
Time frame: At week 24
The Development of CI-DME
To determine if topical OTT166 prevented or delayed the occurrence of CI-DME. CI-DME is defined as the presence of fluid in the central subfield in participants who have no fluid at baseline or CST\> 325 μm. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol. The percentages of participants that developed CI-DME at Week 24 are reported.
Time frame: At week 24
Proportion of Participants That Developed Visually Threatening Complications (VTC) Complications (VTC)
To determine if topical OTT166 prevented or delayed the occurrence of a VTC. VTC is defined as the composite outcome of PDR and/or ASNV and/or CI-DME.
Time frame: At Week 24
Time to Development of PDR Worse Than Mild (DRSS 65 and Above) or CI-DME
To determine if topical OTT166 prevented or delayed the occurrence of PDR worse than mild (DRSS 65 and above) or CI-DME. CI-DME is defined as the presence of fluid in the central subfield in participants who have no fluid at baseline or CST\> 325 μm. Participants who experienced one or more events (worse than mild PDR and/or CI-DME), the earliest event date was selected. Participants who did not experience either event were censored at the earliest of the last available assessment. Median time to event is reported if calculable.
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Proportion of Participants With Change in DRSS Steps at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
To determine the effect of OTT166 on DRSS in participants with moderately severe to severe NPDR and mild PDR treated with topical OTT166. Change in DRSS steps is defined as DR worsening or improving by 1, 2, or ≥ 3 steps along with no change. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol.
Time frame: At week 24
Proportion of Participants With Mild PDR at Baseline Who Regressed to NPDR
To determine the effect of OTT166 on DRSS in participants with mild PDR (DRSS 61B) treated with topical OTT166. Regression of disease was defined as decrease in DRSS to 53 or lower. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol.
Time frame: At week 24
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
To determine the effect of OTT166 on BCVA in participants with moderately severe to severe NPDR and mild PDR. BCVA was assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters score. A higher score represents better visual function.
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Proportion of Participants With Lines Gained/Lost of BCVA
To determine the effect of OTT166 on BCVA in participants with moderately severe to severe NPDR and mild PDR. Proportion of participants who gained/lost lines of BCVA (± 5, 10, and 15 ETDRS letters) were assessed. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol. 5 ETDRS letters = 1 line.
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Area Under the Curve for BCVA (ETDRS Letters) From Baseline to Week 24
To determine the effect of OTT166 on BCVA in participants with moderately severe to severe NPDR and mild PDR. BCVA was assessed by ETDRS letters score. A higher score represents better functioning. AUC from baseline to 24 weeks is calculated by the linear trapezoidal method.
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST)
To determine the effect of OTT166 on CST in participants with moderately severe to severe NPDR and mild PDR. CST was measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Area Under The Curve (AUC) for Change From Baseline in CST
To determine the effect of OTT166 on CST in participants with moderately severe to severe NPDR and mild PDR. CST was measured by OCT.
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Proportion of Participants Who Met the Objective Rescue Criteria
To determine the effect of OTT166 on the need for rescue therapy in participants with moderately severe to severe NPDR and mild PDR.
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Proportion That Met Objective Rescue Therapy Criteria by Week 24
To determine the effect of OTT166 on the need for rescue therapy in participants with moderately severe to severe NPDR and mild PDR. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol.
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Percentages of Participants at Week 24 That Had Had Rescue Therapy Administered
To determine the impact of treatment with OTT166 on the time to receiving rescue therapy. Analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. The reported data include the use of imputation according to the primary estimand as described in the protocol. The data reported are the estimated percentages of participants at Week 24 that had had rescue therapy administered.
Time frame: 24 Weeks