China is a high-risk area of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Although Chinese population accounts for 18.4% of the global population, the number of new HCC patients accounting for about half of the global, which seriously threatens the lives and health of the people. The investigators establish multi-center, retrospective research methods, collecting the data of HCC treatment with system treatment (ICIs and TKIs) plus or without local treatment in the last 3 years, comprehensive assessment of their efficacy and safety, explore whether the efficacy of system treatment combination local treatment showed better effect compared with system or local monotherapy. Our study will find a new way to improve the prognosis of HCC patients.
This was a multi-center, retrospective study involving 2000 patients with HCC receiving ICIs (Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL-1)) and TKIs (Lenvatinib or Sorafenib), ICIs and TKIs plus local treatment (TAC, Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), radiofrequency (RF) ablation, microwave ablation, radiotherapy, etc.), and local monotherapy between Jan, 2019 and Dec, 2021 in China. Efficacy was evaluated with objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to tumor progression (TTP), and 1year and 2 years overall survival (OS). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded and graded. Efficacy and safety of three groups were compared. Stratified analysis was performed according to patients baseline characteristics and medication regimen for combination therapy.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
2,000
Lenvatinib or Sorafenib
Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL-1
Local treatment include: TACE, HAIC, RF Ablation, Microwave Ablation, Radiotherapy, etc.
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, China
RECRUITINGThe objective response rate (ORR)
ORR in three groups were compared
Time frame: 8 weeks
The overall survival (OS)
1 year OS in three groups were compared
Time frame: 12 months
The treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)
Rate of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: 12 months
The progression-free survival (PFS)
ORR in three groups were compared
Time frame: 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.