The main goal of the ENACT (ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks) Group Visit intervention is to integrate a patient-centered advance care planning process into primary care, ultimately helping patients to receive medical care that is aligned with their values. The ENACT Group Visit intervention involves two group discussions about advance care planning with 8-10 patients who meet for 2-hour sessions, one month apart, facilitated by a geriatrician and a social worker. This study will compare the ENACT Group Visit intervention to mailed advance care planning materials.
This pilot feasibility randomized controlled study will determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the ENACT Group Visit intervention compared to a comparison arm. The ENACT Group Visit intervention aims to engage patients in an interactive discussion of key ACP concepts and support patient-initiated ACP actions (i.e. choosing decision-maker(s), deciding on preferences during serious illness, discussing preferences with decision-makers and healthcare providers, and documenting advance directives). The group visits involve two 2-hour sessions, one month apart, facilitated by a geriatrician and a social worker. The ENACT Group Visit is based on an intervention manual that guides the structure, facilitator considerations, session format, and documentation and billing details. The discussions include sharing experiences related to ACP, considering values related to serious illness, choosing a surrogate decision-maker(s), flexibility in decision making, and having conversations with decision-makers and healthcare providers. The facilitators support an interactive discussion that promotes opportunities for patients to learn from others' experiences.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
516
Participation in two 2 hour group visits about advance care planning.
Participants will receive advance care planning resources in the mail with instructions to follow up with their primary care provider.
UCHealth
Aurora, Colorado, United States
UC Health Boulder Family Medicine
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Denver Health Westside Clinic
Denver, Colorado, United States
UC Health Lowry Internal Medicine
Denver, Colorado, United States
UC Health AF Williams Family Medicine
Denver, Colorado, United States
UC Health Lone Tree Seniors
Lone Tree, Colorado, United States
UC Health Lone Tree Primary Care
Lonetree, Colorado, United States
UC Health Westminster Primary Care
Westminster, Colorado, United States
Number of Participants with New Advanced Care Planning (ACP) documentation in their electronic health record at 6 Months
Number of Participants with New Advanced Care Planning (ACP) documentation in the electronic health record inclusive of advance directives (i.e., easy-to-read advance directive, medical durable power of attorney forms, living wills), and medical orders (POLST forms or CPR directives. If an advanced care planning document is completed and in patient's electronic health record, the participant will be counted as having a New ACP.
Time frame: 6 months
Measure of readiness for ACP
Patient readiness for Advanced Care Planning (ACP) will be measured via the Advanced Care Planning (ACP) Engagement Survey. The 4-item ACP Engagement Survey assesses ACP readiness for signing papers for a decision maker; talking with a decision maker; talking with the doctor about future care; and signing papers about future care. Possible scores range from Possible scores for each item range from 1-5 and total scores range from 4-20, with higher indicating more planning readiness and a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Measure of decision self-efficacy
The 11-item Decision Self-Efficacy Scale measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more decision self-efficacy and a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
The Quality of Communication (QOC)
Quality of Communication (QOC) Questionnaire is a 13-item validated measure of the overall quality of end-of-life communication. Possible scores are averaged and range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Composite of advanced care planning documentation
Clinician documentation of ACP (preferences for future medical care) in electronic health record will be measured using a standardized and double-adjudicated chart review audit process. The number of participants with clinician-documented ACP present in their electronic health records will be reported. Documentation of ACP that is added to the record as part of the ENACT group visits will be excluded.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.