A Multi-Center, Open-label Study Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Dual Skincare Regimen Treatment for Facial Hyperpigmentation and Photodamaged Skin in Patients Exposed to Extrinsic Factors of Aging

Improvement in clinical efficacy of hyperpigmentation versus Baseline

The primary efficacy endpoint will be the Investigator Clinical Grading using Modified Griffith's 10-point Scale. A change in scores at week 4, week 8 and week 12 in comparison to baseline indicates an improvement for the indicated parameter. Global facial hyperpigmentation will be assessed on each subject's face using a modified Griffiths' 10-point scale according to the following numerical definitions (half-point scores may be used as necessary to more accurately describe the skin condition): 0 = none (best possible condition); 1 to 3 = mild; 4 to 6 = moderate;7 to 9 = severe (worst possible condition). The lower the score equates to the best possible outcome.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Lack of Significant Increase in Objective Investigator Tolerability Parameters at week 4, 8, 12 compared to Baseline

The primary tolerability endpoint will be favorable analysis of the Investigator Tolerability Assessment of Erythema, Edema and Dryness. A change in scores or lack of significant change at week 4, week 8 and week 12 in comparison to Baseline indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. Four point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome. Example for Erythema: 0 = None No erythema of the treatment area, 1 = Mild Slight, but definite redness of the treatment area, 2 = Moderate Definite redness of the treatment area, 3 = Severe Marked redness of the treatment area

Time frame: 12 weeks

Incidence and severity of adverse events

The primary safety endpoint will be determined by the incidence and severity of adverse events in healthy subjects through-out the length of the study.

Time frame: 12 weeks