The research objectives is to compare vitro 3D drug sensitivity test results of micro tumor (PTC) with the clinical outcomes of patients, evaluate the consistency between the test results of the technology platform and the clinical prognosis, and explore the decision-making value and guiding significance of this technology in assisting the precise treatment of colorectal cancer. The completion of this study will provide real-world data support for the clinical application of micro tumor (PTC) in vitro 3D drug sensitivity detection technology, and provide more valuable reference basis for realizing the individualization and accuracy of colorectal cancer treatment and improving the clinical benefit rate.
The study is a multi agency prospective cohort study in China. The subjects were patients aged 18 \~ 75 years with colorectal cancer diagnosed by histopathology or cytology. They must be colorectal cancer patients who have at least one assessable tumor focus, need adjuvant therapy after radical surgery, and have not received neoadjuvant therapy, ECoG physical condition score ≤ 2 points. And they must be voluntarily participate in and sign informed consent. The patients were randomly divided into PTC drug sensitivity test group and control group. The PTC drug sensitivity test group selected the adjuvant chemotherapy scheme according to the 3D drug sensitivity test results of micro tumor (PTC) in vitro. The control group made adjuvant chemotherapy strategy according to clinical experience. All exon (WES) data collection was used to predict postoperative survival in both groups. The primary endpoint was the non inferiority test, and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was T-C \>- Δ
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
200
Choose chemotherapeutic drugs(5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate/Oxaliplatin + 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate/Irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate/Cetuximab + 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate) based on PTC drug sensitivity results.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
RECRUITINGThe difference of 3-year disease-free survival rate of patients in both group
Follow-up the survival status of patients, and calculate 3-year disease-free survival rate of patients in both group
Time frame: 3 years
The relation between TMB and clinical outcomes
Use tumor whole exon (WES) sequencing to detect the Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) of patients, and use correlation analysis to detect whether it's risk factor of clinical outcomes.
Time frame: 3 years
The relation between MSI and clinical outcomes
Use tumor whole exon (WES) sequencing to detect the Microsatellite Instability (MSI) of patients, and use correlation analysis to detect whether it's risk factor of clinical outcomes.
Time frame: 3 years
The relation between dMMR and clinical outcomes
Use tumor whole exon (WES) sequencing to detect the Deficient Mismatch Repair (dMMR) of patients, and use correlation analysis to detect whether it's risk factor of clinical outcomes.
Time frame: 3 years
The difference of clinical outcomes of patients in both group
Follow-up the health status and weather tumor recurrence and metastasis of patients, and evaluate whether the test results of extended drug regimen correspond with clinical outcomes
Time frame: 3 years
The difference of TTP of patients in both group
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Time To Progress (TTP) of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in TTP.
Time frame: 3 years
The difference of ORR of patients in both group
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Objective Response Rate (ORR) of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in ORR.
Time frame: three years
The difference of DFS of patients in both group
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Disease Free Survival (DFS) of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in DFS.
Time frame: 3 years
The difference of PFS of patients in both group
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Progress Free Survival (PFS) of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in PFS.
Time frame: 3 years
The difference of OS of patients in both group
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Overall Survival (OS) of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in OS.
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.